Savetheday91
Welcome
edit- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Rafy talk 11:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
edit Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Assyrian continuity appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Rafy talk 20:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tariq Aziz with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
You are the ones not being neutral here. You shoot down anyone who has a different opinion. No one wonder Wikipedia is the laughing stock of the world.Savetheday91 (talk) 20:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- You simply cannot add your personal opinion or analysis to articles - it is fundamental Wikipedia policy. You appear to have rather strong views on particular subjects, but Wikipedia is not the venue to express them. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, please take a look at the guidelines posted above. Try to discuss your opinion first in the talk page of an article if you disagree with its content. Remember, this is not a battlefield.--Rafy talk 20:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
No it's not a battlefield, it's a dictatorship. If you can't simply express opinions why is one opinion being favored over others? Is that not expressing an opinion?Savetheday91 (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Assyrian continuity with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to wikipedia where you are threatened for contributing to its encyclopedia. This is the real life 1984.-- Savetheday91 (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Jim1138, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
This is ridiculous. I criticized him I never once threatened him. Savetheday91 (talk) 23:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Personal attacks are not limited to bodily threats - please review WP:NPA which explains this. Please try to comment on content, not on fellow editors. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Prove that I did something wrong. Savetheday91 (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Your edits (here) and (here) are obvious violations of WP:NPA (the subsection WP:NPA#WHATIS spells out what qualifies as a personal attack). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
That's called criticism. Rather harsh criticism but criticism none the less. Savetheday91 (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Read WP:NPA - on Wikipedia, it's called a personal attack regardless of how you attempt to justify it to yourself. Further disruptive edits may result in your account being blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
How impartial of you. Savetheday91 (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 01:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Savetheday91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to make legitimate contributions to Wikipedia. I was trying to make a point before, but I know that disruptive edits are not the way to do that. I know it will get me no where. I also deeply regret writing abusive messages on other users talk pages. I knew what I was doing and that it was wrong but I didn't allow my better judgement to enforce self control. There is no excuse for what I did. But I am now willing to contribute positively to wikipedia by following its guidelines. I'd also like to thank everyone here for the great work they do on this site. Savetheday91 (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have trouble accepting the sincerity of this request given the vitriol you've used recently. Also, I see no positive contributions from this account, every edit you have made has been an effort to attack a person or ethnic group. I also strongly suspect that you attempted to reinsert your POV at Assyrian continuity as an IP after being repeatedly reverted. I see no reason to even consider unblocking you. -- Atama頭 22:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are an incredibly dull person. No one thinks you are big and tough because you are an admin. Savetheday91 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Your e-mail
editIn response to your e-mail where you chose to insult me and make unfounded accusations ... all I have to say is this: look again at who blocked you - it was not me. --- Barek (talk) - 15:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I never made any such email. I never once accused you of blocking me. What on Earth are you talking about? Savetheday91 (talk) 20:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are correct, and I apologize for incorrectly claiming you had sent the email. It was actually sent by a different user with a similar username. Feel free to either remove this thread (so others don't see the mistaken accusation), or leave it (so others can see the apology), your choice.
- To anyone else reading this: please ignore my comment above regarding an email. My post was to the wrong person, on the wrong user talk page. I am sorry for my mistake. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
No worries. I'm sorry to hear that that happened to you. Savetheday91 (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)