Nick carson

Hi Nick, just a note that Victoria is a disambiguation page, and the Australian state is at Victoria (Australia). Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I fixed quite a lot, just happened to notice you editing a lot of the article I was doing them on - but there are many more and I'm sure most of them were not by you at all! Just wanted to let you know about it in case you didn't already, best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Geography of Victoria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bit hasty? Nick carson (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can you say if this was an important year for climate science in Australia? I have a magazine in front of me that claims there were reports in the newspapers about the record low rainfall in south-western Western Australia, apparently at the same time there was flooding in the north-west? Anything you remember would help with an article I'm writing. Ottre 07:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I can't say anything either way regarding wether it was a significant year in that respect. I can say however, that Australia is on a big continent that spans many different climatic zones so the tropical and subtropical can't be compared with the temperate, etc. Remember that climate change isn't only about increased temperatures, it will also bring increased rainfall, temperate regions will tend more towards subtropical, etc. Have a chat to User:Granitethighs, we're part of the editing team rewriting the Sustainability article, he can probably remember 1989 better than me so give that a shot :] Nick carson (talk) 08:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could you put the question to him for me, please? The only sustainability issue I know anything about is mandatory accounting... and that hardly ever comes up in conversation. I'm only looking for one major discovery pre-1991 to compare their coverage to the other magazines which came out in 1980s. Ottre 08:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps try the History section of the Sustainability article, we spent about month on it. Nick carson (talk) 08:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

This courtesy notice is being offered on your talk page as you have been active in music related discussions in the past. A discussion of a proposed wording change to "Criteria for musicians and ensembles" - Criteria 6 is underway on the Notability (music) talk page. Your feedback is appreciated. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on 2009 Southern Australia heat wave, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I always find myself saying this, but why aren't people this quick to actually contribute content? Nick carson (talk) 09:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

What about Tasmania's heatwave, any reason why this has been left out? Aaroncrick (Tassie Talk) 01:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd included Canberra and Mildura, obviously the article is still under construction and I can't continue the work while I am asleep or working. Feel free to help out! Cheers. Nick carson (talk) 05:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've added Launceston, Tasmania because it's probably the hottest major population centre in Tasmania. I'll add more info tomorrow. But the article is still being organised so i might wait until it's finished. Aaroncrick (Tassie Talk) 05:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, I wouldn't say Hobart is going through a heat wave right now, they're pushing 30, and they had hotter temperatures earlier in the month, but Launceston sure is. Nick carson (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree; Hobart is currently only 19. (Typical Hobart weather I suppose) Launceston has had three days in a row over the record temperature before this heatwave. I'll have to add a small section about Flinders Island, which broke the state record temperature on Thursday, then Scamander broke that record yesterday. When the state gets hot, it's normally Hobart getting into the high 30's but not this time. Strangely the area's about 30km inland from Hobart have been getting into the high 30's and Mount Wellington was warmer than Hobart for much of yesterday. Aaroncrick (Tassie Talk) 05:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

On 31 January, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Southern Australia heat wave, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

On 7 February, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Victorian bushfires, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've looked online and I've found nothing stating 96. Police media centre doesn't even state it[1]. Bidgee (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Information from DSE, DHS & CFA via ABC News Radio, a little after midnight. Was wondering why it hadn't been updated yet. Nick carson (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can you remember what was said about sourcing on the talk page? Just because you may hear something on the radio doesn't mean you add it but if you get sources to back it up you can add it. It just stops misinformation from getting in the article. I'm sorry if I've came across as rude but I'm tried (Stuff all sleep in the past 24 hours), house is full of smoke and I'm sick of anons adding unsourced info. Bidgee (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

We're in the same boat with the sleep and the smoke and everything. I can assure you that any info I add won't be completely unsourced. Policy is in need of amendment regarding the inclusion of non-commercial radio sources amongst other things, and this also annoys me. I can understand your frustration with people adding completely unsourced information and I suppose we can hold off on some inclusions until we get a WP out of date policy certified source. Sheesh :] Nick carson (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This map may help you with drawing your map[2]. Also do you know of the map for Beechworth which looks like this map? Just worried on the location ATM and trying to forecast it's location in the next few days (if it's not under control). ATM I'm about 140 - 200km north of the Beechworth fire and the smoke this thick but what was scary yesterday afternoon there was a fire to my west (2km away but was quickly undercontrol) and another fire about 40km to the SE (now undercontrol but was a hairy fire from what I've heard.) Bidgee (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yer. Takes sometime to make the maps! Anyway I'm heading off as I have to be up in 4 hours time. oh yes this was the smoke this afternoon (Much worse now)File:Bushfire smoke in Wagga Wagga Feb 8 2009 01.jpg. Bidgee (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I noticed your comment about the cause. I've posted this here as it's not really for the article.

The fires that went though Kinglake and Marysville move so quickly due to a number of things that came together. First of all you had the hot Northwesterly dry ahead of a heat trough which was moving though Victoria, then there was hotter dry air in the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere which mixed down to the surface which pushed all of the fire danger (Forest and Grass) index to 3 digit levels (100 - 300 which is really off the scale), with the trough getting closer to Melbourne in the afternoon which strengthened the winds in the fire area with winds gust reaching strong to gales force (IE the spotting going km's ahead of the fire) add to that instability ahead of the trough was there but only if temperatures got to the right levels which it did under the fires which caused a number of Pyro-cumulonimbus (Fire made thunderstorms) clouds which had no rainfall but a lot of lightning (starting more fires) as well as possibly having Microbursts which just turned the fire into an inferno (Temperatures would have been 600 - 1000°C judging by the melted metals such as melted alloy wheels). The Bureau of Meteorology will be releasing a report at a later date which could be for sometime before it's released since there will be a Royal Commission which will no doubt delay it. Bidgee (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well the fires also created there own "weather". Some thought the change (trough) moved though but it had as it the change didn't move though Melbourne until the late afternoon/evening and didn't reach the fire areas until about 8 - 10 pm. Also I've transferred your photographs to Commons, I hope you don't mind as they can now be used as all Wikimedia projects including Wikinews. Bidgee (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh also the smoke here this morning was like a thick morning fog (which you see in Winter) with visibility down to 2.2/2.5km. No photos as I was heading to work, which makes working outside hard but cleared up a little during the day. Bidgee (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've done more work on that article then I have. ;) I've only helped out at the start of the article and done some cited source fixes and some other fixes. For more information on barnstars see Wikipedia:Barnstars :). Bidgee (talk) 12:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick. I now that the VP site has not been updated but there are multiple news sources quoting the death toll at 210. A resident of Strathewen died in hospital today. But... if you want to wait for the bureaucrats to catch up then fair enough. Cheers :) Scrooke (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK Nick I guess I was a bit harsh on the boys and girls in blue. I guess doing real police work is more important than maintaining a website. Anyway you might be fighting an uphill battle because others are now editing the death toll. I will leave it until the VP website has confirmed the death, which no doubt they will. Cheers Scrooke (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

	WELCOME	from a Article Rescue Squad member
	Welcome to Article Rescue Squadron Nick carson, a dynamic list of articles needing to be rescued, which changes with new updates, can be found here: Articles tagged for deletion and rescue Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found I look forward to working with you in the future. Ikip (talk) 07:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looking forward to seeing you soon. Thanks for joining. If you need anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Ikip (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I noticed there are OR tags in the lead on the sentence explaining the heatwave as one of many contributing factors to the fires. This is a 'sky is blue' statement and additionally, sources are provided in the dedicated article and the section further below. Nick carson (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nick, if you feel that the OR tag is unnecessary then feel free to remove it. However, there is no reference to heat waves as being a proximal cause of the fires in any cited article that I can see. Although heat waves may seem an obvious contributor to these and other fires to most people it still requires an expert reliable source to confirm it as a "proximal cause" and that has definitely not been provided. Anything else is pure conjecture. Also, if heat waves are such an obvious "the sky is blue" notion in relation to fires, is it necessary to state it as a cause?

Thinking about this issue further, are heatwaves actually a "cause" of fires? They obviously contribute to making conditions worse but they are no more a cause of fires than the dry conditions or the fuel load in the forests. Wouldn't a cause have to be something that actually ignited the fires e.g. lightning, arson, cigarettes etc.? I guess the test is if the temperature alone can cause spontaneous combustion of forests and grasslands etc. Is there any evidence supporting this hypothesis? Correlation does not necessarily lead to causation, although it is often tempting to come to this conclusion. Only scientific study can give us anything close to a factual answer.

I understand that the CSIRO will be releasing a paper on the fire aspects of the heat wave sometime soon. This is probably where we should look for reliable commentary on heatwaves and their relationship to bushfires. Cheers Scrooke (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. The royal comission and the BoM and the CSIRO and all those mobs are currently preparing such reports which will be big sources of factual complete information for us on these interrelated events.

I'm not sure the use of the term proximal cause is as clear cut as a term could be, I reckon something more like ...X & Y & Z & the heatwave, contributed to the conditions experienced on the 7th of February that led to the Kinglake Complex Firestorm etc. Nick carson (talk) 07:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sounds like much better phrasing for the current state of our understanding of the situation. Scrooke (talk) 07:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please see Talk:International_reaction_to_the_2009_Victorian_bushfires. Merbabu still insists that we should not use flag icons on this page. Others consider otherwise. Please observe the discussion and provide your views, which now has gone to a RFC. Kransky (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just had someone go over the article after my changes to the layout:

• map too big - thumb it
• do u really need a gallery for just 2 pics?
• Refs need improvement; try using a citation tool
• I think I'd reorganize it a bit; sections are short and not really about the topic from their headings, e.g. History is only really 1 sentence about history
• Don't need so many subsections - unless you plan to expand each one a lot

I can probably get some more photos for the gallery, expand the history section, if you wanna work on it. Ottre 10:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ottre. The article was still under construction so it might be a bit early for a copyedit. Don't go changing sections and whatnot as the information you are assessing the article on only applies to complete articles. What we do need done on this article is a redirect removal to separate out "Ruffey Creek", "Ruffey Lake" and "Ruffey Lake Park", at present, all 3 redirect to Ruffey Lake Park which means I cannot create the other two articles. This is the most pressing issue with the article at the moment. Thanks. Nick carson (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

That was actually User:Chzz who did the assessment. I know full well there should be a separate article on the Linear Park (Ruffey Creek), it's just that it takes me an hour to get up there. If we were to meet up one weekend at the Doncaster library, I could make time. Ottre 11:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

When I have inserted this message template you should stop editing since I had to fix the sources but you kept editing which caused some of the fixes I did had to be redone. Next time please wait until I've removed the template. Bidgee (talk) 08:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I didn't see the message template prior to your comment. Go for it :] Nick carson (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

On 13 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 southeast Queensland oil spill, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit on the Wonthaggi Desalination Plant was an unsound rumor that contained no source so I therefore removed it. It si good to see people editing the page which has also been tagged for NPOV, but edits need to be sourced and rumors do not help anyone. Regards Random12347 (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I'm really worried about the bias in the article, there needs to be more representation of accuracies such as lack of environmental report, corruption within the government/private partnerships and the fact that it isn't required in the first place, the government could just invest in efficient water usage and sustainable water management. I'll be attacking it soon enough. Nick carson (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:My Disco RRR performance space.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have finally made good my threat of redoing this list (and renaming it)-fairly complete, a few places yet unlocated and may be some neighbourhoods placed in the wrong locality (on the other side of road or creek etc) so could use some help on this (All the spelling is OK though)- Many of the linked articles where all the info. is supposed to be will need some work but I will be doing this shortly. Thought it may be of interest to you. Could it be 2 or 3 page list?? If so, I dont quite know how to achieve this. (Epistemos (talk) 05:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)).Reply

Hey,

I noticed somebody transferred your photos of Heide over to Commons recently. That reminded me, did you know the museum was featured in the March-May 2009 issue of Green magazine? You should definitely have a viddy if you wanted to photograph the grounds sometime; I don't think my camera is good enough for the job. Ottre 09:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing, I'll look into that! I drive past quite often. Nick carson (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't have anything to do with the museum. I occasionally walk up there in the morning to exercise because, as I'm sure you know, it really is a beautiful spot. You also might want to get another shot of Image:Yarra River at Templestowe.JPG, which I'm told has some technical problems, and one of the aboriginal scar tree. Ottre 04:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Smoke Leonards Rd Lilydale Feb 7.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 02:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

More images that require OTRS permissions are File:CFA Strike Team Healesville Feb 8.png, File:Leonards Rd Fire Lilydale 7 Feb.png, File:Chum Creek Road 8th Feb.png, File:CFA in Chum Creek bushfire Feb 8.png and File:Smoke over sun February 7 Vic bushfires.png. Bidgee (talk) 03:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I can't really hold off the deletion. If the images are deleted when you get the OTRS permission then a undeletion request can be done. Bidgee (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I added {{information}} to all of them. If you can get the OTRS ticket in time, I'll transfer them to the commons, if not please re-upload them there. Guy0307 (talk) 11:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Albert Park Map 1993.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated History of the Yarra River, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Yarra River. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Michael Johnson (talk) 09:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Earl of Charlemont (ship) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Livitup (talk) 05:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick, the articles I've started are for two of the most notable Victorian bushfire seasons as defined at the EMA disasters database. I agree that the less notable seasons can be solely covered in Australian bushfire season articles. For the 1925-26 article, the overall statistics are aggregated for the period between February and March (the event period defined by EMA), not just Black Sunday, so I don't think it would be suitable to rename it under that title. Melburnian (talk) 13:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure, what were the circumstances of Black Sunday Feb-March? In the past fires have been ignited on a particular day, then continue to burn for a period of time, these large ignition events are usually named, even if the fires continue to burn afterwards. Nick carson (talk) 10:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The EMA datababase shows the 1926 bushfires as an event that spanned 37 days between February 1 and March 10, claiming 60 lives. The worst day of this was 'Black Sunday' February 14 which claimed 31 lives in the Warburton area. Melburnian (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, that's a real definition-bridger isn't it :/ What do you reckon? Nick carson (talk) 13:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Regarding 1926, I'm finding it difficult to find out what happened on the days before and after Black Sunday...I need to do a bit more research which may influence my thoughts on the scope or naming of the article. Melburnian (talk) 08:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You may be interested in my findings on Flickr:

• Commons:User:Teratornis/Flickr examples#Wind turbines on buildings

I will upload some or maybe all of those photos to Commons eventually, unless someone beats me to it. The best upload procedure I have managed to use successfully is still pretty tedious. --Teratornis (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I uploaded some Flickr images to Commons and added them to Unconventional wind turbines#Rooftop wind-turbines. Rooftop wind turbines are an interesting niche technology, but small wind turbines in general have a lower EROEI than large wind turbines. Thus the rooftop wind turbine is not as effective for cutting carbon dioxide emissions as investing the same money in building a small share of a large wind farm. On the other hand, urban wind turbines tend to be highly visible and can have educational value. Fewer people are likely to get out and visit a remote wind farm off in a place like North Dakota. The best wind resources tend to be in places where not many people live, in part because windy places are rather unpleasant. Not many people want to live where the wind is howling every day. --Teratornis (talk) 02:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey there,

Noticed you have a picture of one of my paste-ups uploaded onto the wiki melbourne street art page. would be great if you could lable the artist as Drab. Here is the link to my blog that has the image http://drab-art.blogspot.com/2009/02/some-new-shit.html

Cheers

Drab

Hey there,

Noticed you have a picture of one of my paste-ups uploaded onto the wiki melbourne street art page. would be great if you could lable the artist as Drab. Here is the link to my blog that has the image http://drab-art.blogspot.com/2009/02/some-new-shit.html

Cheers

Drab

I'm not having a good time with your edits. I am finding them too pov and the language used sometimes doesn't help. The article on the desal plant should naturally have as much information as possible and this includes information created by opponents (which I assume you are one). Yet to make such an article good to read, you need to remove as much biased language as you possibly can so that the reader can make up their own mind, rather than using words/phrases that are intended to sway the reader. Example:

Comparitively, the Kwinana Desalination Plant in Perth was completed in 2006, has roughly 30-50% the output of the Wonthaggi plant, however, it cost a mere $387 million to build.

Apart from the spelling mistake (which is anathema to all wikipedia editors), using the word "mere" diverts readers from fact to opinion. An editorial or a opinion piece is where "mere" should be used. Moreover, comparing the two costs is not a good idea anyway because it fails to take into account certain facts such as the cost of building longer water pipes from the Bass Coast to Melbourne compared to Kwinana and Perth - but these facts are irrelevant anyway because there is no external link to a reputable article discussing it. If an article in The Age or the ABC appeared where someone was discussing the comparative costs between Wonthaggi and Kwinana then it would certainly be appropriate to have it in the article. Without such an external link, Wikipedia turns into a place for original research and that is not what should occur in any article.

FWIW, I support Desal plants but I'm also supportive of cheaper and more efficient ways of water management. That's my bias but I try not to let it influence what I write (I had to edit the Kurnell Desalination Plant page from being too supportive of the project). You've obviously got your own bias but I would encourage you to try and write more neutrally.

BTW - being biased is not a problem, letting it affect your writing at Wikipedia is.

In short, I would suggest:

• Check your spelling.
• Use neutral language.
• Never use original research.
• Always link to (reputable) external sources.

--One Salient Oversight (talk) 08:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thanks for your comments and transparency :]

On Wikipedia, I neither support or oppose the desalination plant. This is an encyclopedia and as such I keep my opinions to myself and contribute what information I can to the best of my abilities, skills, knowledge and access to resources in an unbiased manner. The portrayal of the proposed plant as such in encyclopedic form as close to reality as possible, reveals inherent truths about the proposed plant that supporters may not wish to acknowledge. I am willing to acknowledge any realities about the proposed plant, favour them the opponents or the supporters.

The reality of the situation with this subject matter is that the justification for the proposal was based on inadequate assessments, predictions and imperial material and in truth, the plant and any water manufactured thus, is not required. The proposed utilisation of a public-private partnership (PPP) is pushing up the overall cost of the plant, will push up the cost of water manufactured at the plant and will generate substantial profits for investors in the plant. If the proposal was required, the best option would have been to publicly fund, own and operate the plant. In addition, residents will not be given the option to choose where the water they drink comes from, these end users were not consulted at any stage and international law advises against the private ownership of water as it is a basic human right to access clean, free, drinking water. All of the above is entirely factual.

My personal opinion is an entirely different matter and not one up for discussion here on WP. I maintain that my edits have been unbiased and well-informed and would go so far as to suggest that they may be better informed than those of other editors of the article in question. I'll also include this response on your talk page. Cheers :] Nick carson (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:LaTrobe Valley CFPS.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:LaTrobe Valley CFPS.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:LaTrobe Valley CFPS.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Andersons Creek Gold Memorial.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Andersons Creek Gold Memorial.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Warrandyte State Park backburning 08.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Warrandyte State Park backburning 08.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Warrandyte State Park Tunnel St Entrance.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Warrandyte State Park Tunnel St Entrance.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Whipstick Gully Headframe.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Whipstick Gully Headframe.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

There are a number of edittors contrubting to the Bathurst 1000 based articles today - please check someone else has not already made those alterations. --Falcadore (talk) 07:03, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nice work with the new map (Mount Panorama Circuit Map Overview.PNG) - small problem, Griffins Bend and Quarry Corner are one and the same. What you have labelled Griffins Bend was known historically as Griffins Mount. --Falcadore (talk) 09:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nick, I am a little concerned at this and the accompanying edit summary. Firstly, you reinstated at least two spelling mistakes by doing that. Secondly but more significantly you maligned me by stating "reverted edits by Moondyne, was not merely sp & gr edits, rather, a reword, which portrays critisism of the proposal in an unbiased light". I stand by each of the edits and their edit summaries; perhaps you just saw the last one (17:43) which was "typos" and which was exactly that. This edit had the most material change on that day and was under the edit summary of "typos, grammar". The change was exactly that and not some skulduggery as you seem to be implying. Perhaps you can explain the phrase "... portrays critisism of the proposal in an unbiased light". I really don't know what that means. I see a failure to assume good faith. Thirdly, your edit was not a simple reversion but included changes of your own, as can be seen from the byte count on the history page.

Bottom line here is I'm not seriously bothered about any of this — I have a fairly thick skin. I would just ask that you assume good faith and know that I am only trying to improve the article, which I believe is still in a very poor condition. Please don't revert me in this manner again. –Moondyne 13:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#section name and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Requesting Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, The Four Deuces (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please be careful when adding content that it's not a copy and paste from a news site like you did in the November 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave article[3]. Bidgee (talk) 04:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've done it again.

November 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave[4]

"The Climate Emergency Action Network said the November heatwave should act as a wake-up call to all politicians about the need for urgent action on climate change. A spokesperson related; "Adelaide's unprecedented November heatwave is classic climate-change weather.""

The Age's article[5]

" the Climate Emergency Action Network said the November heatwave should act as a wake-up call to all politicians about the need for urgent action on climate change.

"Adelaide's unprecedented November heatwave is classic climate-change weather," spokesman John Rice said."

As you can see it's quite the same. Bidgee (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Adelaide's unprecedented November heatwave is classic climate-change weather," spokesman John Rice said." is a quote but the Climate Emergency Action Network said the November heatwave should act as a wake-up call to all politicians about the need for urgent action on climate change isn't. Bidgee (talk) 06:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick, I don't know if this is the write way to contact you but couldn't see an email address. I would like to talk to you about using one of your photographs, can you please contact me at chris@albs.tv? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrischapman (talk • contribs) 22:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. Sorry. From where I happened to be it wasn't a practical photographic subject. There were also roadworks happening on the roads leading to the site of the plant, preventing anyone but locals and site workers getting near the place. I don't think there was any conspiracy behind that. Just a sensible thing to do at the time. HiLo48 (talk) 02:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cool, thanks. They have used that tactic before during rallies at the site, but I'm not sure if they use it when there are no planned rallies. Nick carson (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010)   Previous issue | Next issue

Content

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Grsz¹¹ 01:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the particular case of Hope for Haiti, I was presenting the subject matter in a neutral point of view. You'll find that the Good Friday Appeal, held in Victoria, Australia, annually since 1931, raises over $10 million every year ($13.8 million in 2009). This is just for one hospital, not an entire country, and draws from a population of merely 5 million, as opposed to the 300 million that live in the United States. Despite these facts, the Good Friday Appeal is not widely publicised around the world in patriotic fashion, it's not about publicity, it's about raising money for a hospital. They are also able to offer running tallies! I live in Australia and there has been massive criticism of 'Hope for Haiti', such criticism is well founded, especially when you consider that a large portion of the donations came from a handful of wealthy celebrities.

I am under the impression that WP policies regarding verifiability and reliable sources are in need of amendment and despite such, are always open to questioning and suggestion. I am positive there are many sources that stand up to current WP policy, which I can use to cite my contributions if I had the time (I am only one person in a sea of nationalist partiotism) but I get the feeling this article is presented in a biased manner and such criticisms of the 'Hope for Haiti' fund raising is frowned upon, even within the WP community.

Swallow your pride and face up to the realities that the fundraiser has raised more in publicity and advertising for United States entities and individuals than it did for the victims of Haiti. The Black Saturday bushfires killed a mere 173 people and yet 22 million Australians were able to muster over $370 million! Present the article's subject matter in a neutral point of view and cite those sources that are out there. The bias within the article as it stands is totally pathetic. Nick carson (talk) 08:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Lentil as Anything requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

You might want to give people more than 3 minutes to create an entire article before you tag it for deletion, crazy! Nick carson (talk) 09:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hey there Nick carson, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Nick carson/uploaded photos. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just added a ref to your article on the Melbourne thunderstorm to stop any possible CSD. Id assume its a work in progress? -Marcusmax(speak) 04:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Nick carson. You have new messages at Ctjf83's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry bout the bad nomination on my part. CTJF83 chat 07:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I fixed some spelling on 2010 Melbourne thunderstorm, but you changed it back. Affects is a verb, as in "The storm really affects me." Effects is a noun, as in "the effects of the storm were great." StAnselm (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Apologies, I was intending to go through and fix spelling, etc. I wasn't the one who changed it back. Thanks. Nick carson (talk) 08:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated 2003 Melbourne thunderstorm, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Melbourne Thunderstorm and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Marcusmax(speak) 03:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

On 9 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Victorian storms, which you created and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 18:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2010 Victorian storms, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Victorian storms. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Hooked Up Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

You have two options. First (and the much preferred option): Create a sandbox page (user subpage) to create the article, and get it into good shape first, then when it's ready you can copy it onto a new article page in the main Wikipedia article space. The article still may be deleted if the subject doesn't meet notability standards, but it usually stands a much better chance this way. Second: When you post a new article, put a {{underconstruction}} tag at the top, which lets admins and other editors know you're working on this article. You can also put a comment on the article's talk page saying something like, "I only get on Wikipedia once every few days, so give me a little time to flesh this out." Won't work every time, but it helps. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Spoken like a true inclusionist. As you may expect, I disagree pretty much 100%. I think you're just ticked off because your article was deleted. I see this reaction on occasion, though not as much as you might think. If you really, truly think this record company is notable, post the article again and come up with some verifiable references. But be advised that I may nominate it for deletion again (not by speedy) if I don't think it meets notability requirements. I can't begin to tell you how many garage bands (often formed a week ago) and their record company counterparts that I see in new-page patrol, virtually all of which are not even close to being notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:07, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

That would be the case in an ideal word. But in fact, the vast majority of articles which are speedy deleted are absolute garbage, and the time taken to ostensibly "improve" those articles is wasted. Spend some time on new page patrol and you'll see that reality is far different from your idealistic notions. I say that because I once largely held to those notions as well. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 12:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

You may want to merge 2010 Perth storms into 2010 Perth hail storm. Bidgee (talk) 12:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

That mundaring weir/lake c y oconnor shot was a beauty - was that from a commercial flight, or you a pilot? SatuSuro 10:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lake_C_Y_O%27Connor_from_the_air_2010.JPG - actually that should be in commons http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mundaring_Weir, rather than main space en - are you aware of the difference? cheers SatuSuro 10:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry that wasnt meant to be facetious (difference..I have uploaded to en by mistake in the past) - Bidgee shifted them - I watched :) SatuSuro 13:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Renewable infrastructure proposal Australia.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article RP7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable topic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wizard191 (talk) 12:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I just noticed that when you expanded this lighthouse article back in 2008 you simply copied and pasted content from a Parks Victoria website. Meanwhile you should know that such copyright violations aren't tolerated on Wikipedia. I've disabled the relevant text in the article and would ask you to help rewrite it so we can still use it. Regards, De728631 (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Maton Guitar Factory Entrance.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —fetch·comms 04:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

My bad, an IP had removed the copyright tag earlier. All fixed now. —fetch·comms 04:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Other Side of Dawn Front Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nice! Timeshift (talk) 05:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doncaster Shoppingtown 1970's.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 20:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey Nick, i'm not a frequent user of Wiki and have never really got involved in writing it so dont really intend to here. I am a VICSES vol so i'm interested in your topic. All I really wanted to say was good effort, I like what I read on the page. Well done. Regards Ian Shelton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.177.23 (talk) 05:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Poster Melbourne street art CBD September 2010.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

• West Coast
  • Shipwreck Coast
  • Great Ocean Road
  • Surf Coast

When I read the Great Ocean Road lead para I am sort of wondering how you are going to tie in these ? - just wondering SatuSuro 14:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Admittedly I did have some fun with some of the odder overlaps at Coastline of Western Australia - so dont get me wrong :) SatuSuro 14:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that the map of recent fires does not include the devastating fires in the Brisbane Ranges,Anakie area in 2006 (or maybe 07?) same year the the Grampians and gippsland fires, could it be added, for the record? 58.168.211.80 (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've added some pics and references to the Street art in Melbourne page. So far the gallery's a pretty good selection of obscure/understated posters and experimental street art forms and more prominent graff/stencils in the laneways, but I've got some other pics worth adding. Do you think the gallery should be a limited to a certain number of pics (for the sake of quality > quanity)? It's currently at 24, which seems ideal. I just wouldn't want to remove what you've already added. HappyWaldo (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I was really interested in your collection of photos of various places around Melbourne, many of which I recognise. I dearly love Melbourne and it's nice to her well-represented on the net. Thanks :) Melba1 (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey Nick,

I've been searching for the 'Tomorrow When the War Began' 2001 cover edition for a little while and i was wondering if you could msg me back with the ISBN number so that i might have a better chance of finding an exact match.

I hope to hear from you. i would appreciate it if you could please email me at brown_C@lotterywest.wa.gov.au

Thanks CB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.30.38.252 (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Yarra River, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.whitehat.com.au/melbourne/Buildings/7Bridges.asp; OTRS:5382902, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Yarra River and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Yarra River, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Yarra River with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Yarra River. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Yarra River saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Darebin Creek, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.dcmc.org.au/fact_sheets/history_of_darebin_parklands.pdf, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Darebin Creek and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Darebin Creek, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Darebin Creek with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Darebin Creek. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Darebin Creek saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mountain Maid, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/heritage/projects-and-programs/Shipwreck-dive-sites/mountain-maid, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mountain Maid and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mountain Maid, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mountain Maid with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mountain Maid. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mountain Maid saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 16:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Greens logo 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please see Portal talk:Renewable energy#Task force ?... Johnfos (talk) 19:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick. I am a first time user. Do you have any photos of Brunswick? I'm looking for a shot that encompasses Sydney Road, a tram, and the leafy parks. Can you help me? Thanks. Chris Staycentral (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Price on Pollution rally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Price on Pollution rally until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LordVetinari (talk) 09:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:09 Victorian bushfires locator map.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Burning For Revenge Front Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Darkness Be My Friend Front Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Night is for Hunting Front Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Melbourne Wheatpaste Poster 1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wonthaggi desalination plant location map.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cardinia Pipeline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Western port satallite image.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kinglake complex map.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kinglake complex map 2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irene Underground Arts Festival inside shot 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)Reply

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

In reference to your photo of the 3 types of didgeridoos: It appears that the top instrument (that you list as traditionally crafted & decorated) appears to be a "tourist" didgeridoo, decorated in a non-traditional way. Perhaps it was made entirely by Aboriginals, but it appears to have been made for tourist trade and does not appear to be made by Aboriginals from the traditional region of the didgeridoo. Do you know where you collected the instrument? Who made it? Perhaps you can you cite the maker in your photo? Hmarin (talk) 10:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Montsalvat – A Symphony of Mud and Stone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there is no indication that this unpublished 20-page "text" has any kind of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

G'day Nick,

I was just reading Wiki article "Warrandyte, Victoria", where I was born 1955, left as soon as I could count the bus fare, returned 1992 and remain here. My father's family had strong associations in Warrandyte for several generations.

In section 2.5 "The Bridge", there is an error and typo. It says "....the bridge was located 5 mi east of the current bridge..." this is in fact not so, the old bridge was just (yep, say 5 metres) west of the current bridge (virtually congruent).

Pre-mining, the first european inhabitant was Captain Selby, who as a grazier had a "selection" encompassing Tills Drive and "Black Flats" and Selby Store (now known as "Stonehouse Cafe"). "Black Flats" was site of last indigenous Aborigine corroboree in the region.

"Norman's Reserve" at "Pound Bend", was notorious not as a reserve due to normal habitation by local Aborigines, but as a transition camp for Aborigines of Melbourne area etc, being dispossessed and moved to Lake Tyres and other such remote locales. Effectively it was a transition prison.

Section 2.2, the "cairn" is not located on "Fourth Hill" as stated. It is located adjacent Andersen's Creek and Gold Memorial Road. The tunnel at "Pound Bend" was known to locals as "Evelyn Tunnel" (see Wiki article "Pound Bend Tunnel"). Where it says "Some areas continued to be mined up until the 1960s", this is not so. The last mine continuing from the Gold Rush days was the Caledonia mine, which continued to operate up until 1914. In about 1968, local newcomer identity Richard Darby (nick-named "Wishbone" from the cantankerous cook GW (George Washington) Wishbone of the early 60s TV series "Rawhide"), re-opened the "Little Victory" mine in "Whipstick Gully" (just 100 metres from the Pub). He worked the mine by hand for about 5 years and allegedly made enough money to buy a new Holden Kingswood (back when gold was bought at $32 per oz). See Herald article of the time (by my brother) "Its Gold Again".

I have to go for tea, but before I go, James Anderson was fossicking subsequent to the Victorian Govt offering a reward for the discovery of gold (after the discoveries in NSW.) Allegedly and as told at school, gold was discovered at Warrandyte by Anderson, who jumped on his horse and rode to Melbourne to make claim on the reward. The next day, in strode a bloke who discovered gold in Clunes, at least a day and a half further away than Warrandyte. The Clunes / Warrandyte dispute goes on, but the Govt never issued the reward, so neither man nor horse benefited by the Govt..

I may get time to further review the "Warrandyte, Victoria" entry.

Chris Davis 121.219.171.154 (talk) 09:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I would like your opinion on the potential non-notability of this topic. As you have previously advocated that this article is not notable I would like to see if you agree with my findings on the topic. Thank you. Macktheknifeau (talk) 16:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Melbourne Meetup Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus Previous: 25 November 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

I had a read of the page Warrandyte, Victoria. Having lived in Warrandyte for 58 years, and my parents and some predecessors before that, I find the article inaccurate or significantly incomplete from an historical perspective. The previous inclusive "Warrandyte" page was more historically accurate and inclusive (albeit it retained historical and geographic errors).

It is undoubtedly reasonable, in the light of divisive bureaucratic cleavage of the town, that two separate Wikipedia pages are made, however, it is not reasonable, that the Warrandyte page has no reference to North Warrandyte, despite it being until recently all as one Warrandyte. It is reasonable that the page mention South Warrandyte as a separate place, as it always has been, and is more than 3 kilometres from Warrandyte township, closer to Park Orchards, and more serviced by Ringwood. North Warrandyte, however, uses all the services, amenities and commercial facilities of the town centre South of the river.

For the entire 20th C, the people have complained about the division of the town catchment into municipalities of Eltham (now Nillumbik) and Doncaster & Templestowe (now Manningham), and in the greater identified Warrandyte catchment Eltham, Doncaster & Templestowe, Croydon, Lilydale, and Ringwood municipalities. The net result being the under-servicing of the town. Historically, the people of the region have identified themselves as Warrandytians within these approximate bounds; Coleman Rd, Delany's Road, Brumbies Lane., Anzac Av (Johansons Lane), Hoopers Rd, Bourchiers Rd, Bellbird Lane, Cowden Rd, Beauty Point Rd, Shorts Rd, Glynns Rd, and then the bounds of Mullum Mullum Creek.

To this day "North Warrandyte remain substantially under-serviced by Nillumbik municipality, and the State Govt, in its Bushfire Emergency brochure requires all people (including those of "North" Warrandyte) to congregate at the Warrandyte recreation ground. No doubt it is because there is no "Safe" area in "North" Warrandyte (with the majority of "Warrandyte" residences) Again a bureaucratic blunder (and extremely dangerous one) and lack of interest of the municipalities, that would have a major bottleneck and extreme death risk at the bridge.

I note for example, that all the mentioned artists (a few of the many) possibly with the exception of Harold Herbert, lived in North Warrandyte, so in light of the separation should not be on this page, but the North Warrandyte page. A good reference would be the book, Rebels and Precursors, by Richard Haese.

I am available should you wish further discussion.

Regards and best wishes Chris Davis cdavis@ibec.com.au 120.151.99.4 (talk) 01:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Nick,

Can you please modify Greater Melbourne Metropolitan area from 8806km2 to 9,990.5 km2 ?

Source: Victorian Government: https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/aboutmelbourne/statistics/pages/melbournesnapshot.aspx

Thank you, Julian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapacit (talk • contribs) 14:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:The Dead of the Night Front Cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Nick Carson,

We are visual artists and academics who are currently working on a chapter in a book entitled ‘The Photograph and the Album’ (published by MuseumsEtc http://museumsetc.com/blogs/news/7422776-forthcoming-the-photograph-and-the-album). We are also contributing to the editorship of this volume.

Our chapter is examining the role that the internet plays in acting as a 'giant photograph album'. We have taken this principle and have begun to look for images, searching – as many of us do – under our own names, curious to find out what images appear.

The following image came up in relation to one of our surnames:

Mullum Mullum Creek Trail through the Linear Park http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mullum_mullum_creek_linear_park_path.JPG

We are interested in using this image in our chapter and want to confirm that you agree that we can do this in line with the statement that appears in Wikimedia Commons which is as follows:

“This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Nick carson at the wikipedia project. This applies worldwide. In case this is not legally possible: Nick carson grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.”

To be clear about our use of the image, it will appear as part of a sequence of images for which we will provide full captions and acknowledgement (in reference to the information which appears on the webpage provided above).

We hope you are willing to give permission and would appreciate if you would confirm this via this email – j.carson@salford.ac.uk. We would also be very grateful if you could inform us of any other parties from whom we should seek permission in reference to this image, if you are aware of any such parties.

If you are willing to give permission please confirm the text you would like us to present in relation to the images to satisfy the condition of attribution.

We would appreciate it if you could respond by Friday May 24th 2013.

Thank you for your consideration & please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Very best regards, Rosie Miller & Jonathan Carson

90.200.100.193 (talk) 16:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why would you remove my comments? I'm horrified to read so much rubbish about the Melbourne Convent! Am I the only person who was treated well -and didn't want to leave???

Why would you remove my comments? I'm horrified to read so much rubbish about the Melbourne Convent! Am I the only person who was treated well -and didn't want to leave??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Portrobin (talk • contribs) 05:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Milgate Park Estate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a housing estate, fails WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 06:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Irony generally refers to an event that was the opposite of what was expected and/or contradictions. I don't think it can be said to be "ironic" that Seachange led to an increase in tourism; this is probably a reasonably expected outcome. Instead you could say that it was "fortunate" that Seachange led to an increase in tourism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.192.68 (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? I know you did this last month, but it wasn't a formal consensus discussion, but now it is. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hi Nick, your photo File:Various Types of Didgeridoo.JPG is used on [6] without attribution. --Herr Möbius (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Late 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 20:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick

Thanks for all of your work on Wikipedia, and I hope you're well in these strange times.

I'm helping my daughter to do some work for a school project on the kangaroos at the Currawong Bush Park. We've found your article on the park to be really useful.

I believe that you inserted a reference to the November 2003 Currawong Bush Park Management Plan when editing that article on 24 September 2008. We've tried to get a copy of that Management Plan from the Manningham City Council, but they don't seem to have it. I know that your edit is over 12 years old, but is there any chance that you still have it? If so, could you please send it, or otherwise make it available to me?

Please don't worry if you don't have it, I just thought it wouldn't hurt to ask.

Kind regards

FizzyOwl7288

Hi Nick,

My name is Kristen and I've come across an image you uploaded of the palaeo-river channels of the ancestral Yarra. I can't find any source for the image but it would be beneficial for my Masters thesis (the subject is relict landforms in Port Phillip Bay). I was wondering if you could point me to where you sourced the image?

I do not have an account here, so please contact me on kristen.ellis@outlook.com.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Kristen.

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hooked Up Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hooked Up Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cradle-to-cradle design, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cradle-to-cradle design until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TCBT1CSI (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply