User talk:Myasuda/Archive 1

The type of change you made here is great. You also noted in the summary that you had a definative source. Please include the source in your edit to comply with verification standards of wikipedia. You can do this by typing in "[http://www.wikipeida.org comment]" after the information - the comment is optional - that will make a nice external link or without a comment a footnote like link[[1].

I hope my comment above didn't discourage you from editing the article. Verifiability is a big issue on Wikipedia - something that doesn't get done enough. With negative information on living people it is a must. With this kind of info - we need to get it sometime but not immediately. I'll try to find another source - but if he said you could use the email that would be fine too! --Trödel 22:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thx for the explanation - I will probably delete it in a few minutes - btw Ken already has it on his website - or he put it there since we started talking ;) http://www.ken-jennings.com/aboutken.html

Thanks for adding the summary of the Oeckl review to Bogdanov Affair. Anville 21:55, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey, great job on List of National Basketball Association players with 60 or more points in a game! What are your sources? —Wknight94 (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you're referring to the fgms, ftms and rebounds, then my sources are old NBA guides or similar texts . . . but a lot of this stuff can be corroborated on the web. I used to have more books, and could probably have filled out the list for the pre-1980's 60+ point games . . . but unless those books are packed in boxes in another state, I may no longer have them. Myasuda 02:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I was referring to the stat details. If you can add citations for those guides - like ISBNs or whatever - that would be great. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Don't know whether you've been watching Talk:Japanese American internment but there's a pissing match heated discussion going on between Critic-at-arms and History Student. I suppose that it's OK as long as it stays on Talk, but I'd prefer to keep HS on good behavior. Don't know whether you have any thoughts on this matter. --ishu 06:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I had not been following the "debate" until you brought it to my attention . . . HS seems determined to generate controversy, and from HS's edit history it's clear that the JA Internment is his/her sole topic of concern on Wikipeida (does this qualify as an obsession?). I'm not sympathetic to HS's viewpoint, so I won't claim impartiality when I state that I hope that HS leaves the forum and article soon and on his/her own volition. At the same time, I don't want to wade into the middle of the fight as I simply don't have the time, energy, or inclination right now to join what appears to be a futile war of words. I think your efforts to maintain civility between the two parties is admirable, but right now it appears that they are simply talking past you. Myasuda 06:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just as a note, after looking through only a few player profiles at lakersplayers.org, it seems there's a lot of other profiles stolen from wikipedia without permission...Have a good day! FamicomJL 03:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for adding that Washington Capitols streak to the list. I only had the ones from NBA.com. Thanks! -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 03:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you are a member of Wikiproject:National Basketball Association. I'd like to ask a favor of you: Bill Russell's article is a Featured Article Candidate and I'm worried that it may not pass merely because there are not enough reviewers looking it over. Would you mind looking it over and seeing if you feel it meets the criteria. If you have never done so before all you have to do is look over the criteria and see if it meets them. You can pass, fail, or stay neutral. Don't worry if you don't like anything in the article you can state so and usually people will work to improve it. Here is the candidacy page. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 08:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the positive feedback, always great to see that. Thanks! -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 22:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, check this out, too. I just finished it. -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 00:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the compliment, I'm actually not done copyediting the Big O article. I only have occassional time to give, but I'm trying to finish it up. I have a request if you could help me out, though. The pic of Robertson in the infobox was removed, I think because it wasn't free use. I'm no expert on the fair use, free use, or any copyright subject so I usually don't mess with pics. But if you or someone else could upload a good picture for the article, I would appreciate it. Also, thanks for the suggestions of articles to copyedit, the oldtime basketball players definitely appeal to me, so I'll try and work my way through them.Timpcrk87 03:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I noticed your comments on the double-double web page. That is good stuff and I was searching specifically for it in thinking of the greatest ever double-double. I know Wilt is the only person to ever get a double triple-double and the list of quadruple-doubles is 4 long so it's easy to see it all.

The next step would be a five-by-five. Since no one has ever had a quintuple double, this is the analogous stat. If someone gets 5 in all 5 categories, that's a five-by-five, maybe you have heard of it. I don't know much about making a page on here. I just add info so I thought since you were interested in this type of stuff, maybe you'd want to. If you don't, that's cool. Here's the best page I know about... it's on basketball-reference.com. He has all box scores from the NBA from 1986-87 through the last completed season and he can just search through them with a computer search. So, I asked if he'd look up all the five-by-fives once and he did. Any way, here's the web page with the list of the 14 occurrences in that time span

http://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/five_by_five.html

I'm about 99.9% sure it hasn't happened this year because about the only people capable are Marcus Camby and Andrei Kirilenko and I look at their stats regularly to see if they got another one. Camby was 1 steal or so short not long ago and just 2 stat points short a couple other times in the same one month period but he has not attained it again. Kirilenko's stats are downhill this year so he hasn't gotten close.

Also, I have no idea how many occurrences have happened in the previous years before 1986-87 (and after steals and blocks were recorded). You seem to have more knowledge of how to find these things that are not just sitting on a web page somewhere. Odds are, not many.

I believe Hakeem and AK have the record for most in all five categories... that is they both got 6 in all five categories in one game, on the list. I think AK did it in regulation and I know Hakeem did not. Even though this guy does not have box scores from before that, I believe I saw a link once stating Hakeem's 6 of each was a record (possibly on ESPN.com). Then, AK did it last year.

Another stat that might be interesting, and along the same lines, is the career quintiple-whatever. That is, who has the best career highs in all five categories... more specifically, I'm about 99.9% sure no one has 10 in all stats for career highs and that's easy to verify (though I have not taken the time) since 10 steals has only happened 19 times ever and I could just check career highs in blocks for those people. But, has any one ever gotten at least 9 in all five categories for a career? I'd say 8 is a for sure. Yea, Hakeem has gotten 8 steals once at least.

Links to Hakeem, Andrei getting career eight-by-fives. http://www.nba.com/playerfile/hakeem_olajuwon/ http://www.nba.com/playerfile/andrei_kirilenko/career_stats.html

Here's a link stating these two are the only ones to get a five-by-six as it is called in Andrei Kirilenko's article.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-060106-08

Geoff —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.56.112.75 (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Please note that I responded to this entry at User talk:70.56.112.75. Myasuda 13:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Myasuda, Good idea. You may want to add a sortable option after each. They all show up on the cat page as under 'T'. For example see {{MinnesotaTimberwolvesCoach}}. Вasil | talk 19:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I created a page for a five-by-five. I still have work to do on it but I have a lot finished. Again, I don't know if you can help at all but if you have any way of looking at stats for years 1973-74 through 1985-86, that'd be nice as most of the stats recorded are only from 1986-87 on. The guy from basketball-reference.com has all box scores from that season on but not the ones from before.

StatisticsMan

Also, I just found a Sportingnews.com article which states that besides AK and Hakeem, seven others have done it once (and those two are the only ones with multiple games). Thus, the only possible five-by-fives not already listed on the page are from Hakeem's first two seasons, 1984-85, 1985-86... and then there are two other people who have done it one time. So, though this still leaves tons of searching, it narrows it down a lot.

I started the basketball five-by-five page at "Basketball_five-by-five". But, I don't like that name. I guess I didn't realize that's the name that would appear at the top of the screen. Not to mention, the f's aren't capitalized. Is it a big deal to delete a page? I'd like to move it to "Five-by-Five (Basketball)" and delete the old one. Thanks StatisticsMan 19:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I thought you should be aware of this: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/TyrusThomas4lyf. Also I need help with some diffs rregarding the Jordan POV. Quadzilla99 11:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

See here for a filled out RFC, if you wish to do so you can start your own list of diffs and statements. I didn't have the energy to do all the Jordan/Bryant/Wade/James diffs. You can also start your own start you own section see here. Quadzilla99 11:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bye-bye. Quadzilla99 13:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am very sorry for that mistake - I was getting used to using WP:MWT and accidentally right-clicked on the page, which reverted the edit! Thanks for notifying me; I'll be more careful next time. — Wenli 01:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:NOR----^DarkTea 12:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The reference is about the Bowie Seamount, which says "A YOUNG submarine volcano at the base of the continental slope west of Canada has been named after the Canadian geophysicist J. Tuzo Wilson." Black Tusk 05:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, I thought it was about the Bowie Seamount because I searched "Bowie Seamount volcano" on google. I know it does not say anything about the seamount, but I thought it was because the Bowie Seamount also young. Where is the Tuzo Wilson Seamount? Black Tusk 14:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you know if the Tuzo Wilson Seamount is part of the Tuzo Wilson Volcanic Field? Because it contains two 500-700-m-high submarine volcanoes. [2] Black Tusk 19:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm just confused about the submarine volcano's name, because I have seen it called "Tuzo Wilson Seamounts", "Tuzo Wilson Seamount" and I'm not sure if the "Tuzo Wilson Volcanic Field" is related or is the same thing. I would make an article about the volcano, but I don't know what the real name is (maybe it has one than one name?).Black Tusk 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here's my argument that Wilt never fouling out of an NBA game is significant:

1. He played center, mostly around the basket, both on offense and defense, which lends itself to collecting a lot of fouls. Surely, most centers and power forwards of Wilt's era knew how to draw a charging foul. 2. The nearest competitor in the "never fouling out" category according to NBA records is 0-for-645. Wilt was 0-for-1045. 3. Also, most of the names that appear on the "never fouling out" list are guards, who don't commit that many fouls to begin with.

I agree that Malone's streak of 1212 straight without fouling out is very worthy of note, but this streak started in 1978. He had four seasons of committing fouls before that.

And, during Wilt's time, the number of fouls before fouling out was five. I believe it was expanded to six in 1974-75.

Again, my opinion.

from "Mynameisphil"

For my response, see [3]

Myasuda 23:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Myasuda, do you know the elevation of the Tuzo Wilson Seamounts? Black Tusk 25:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, that elevation is actually how high the volcanoes are below sea level. I ment the elevation above sea level. I seen you added the elevation to the Bowie Seamount as -24 m (-79 ft), but I can't seem to find the same for the Tuzo Wilson Seamounts. Black Tusk 21:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Myasuda. I didn't mean to start an edit war with you on the Wilt Chamberlain page.

You might be interested in the the following sources: [4] , where Marc Stein contends that Kobe's 81 was a greater than Wilt's 100 and [5], an analysis by John Hollinger.

The second link requires a paid subscription, but in it Hollinger points out that had Bryant "played for an additional six minutes and scored at the same rate (hardly an unreasonable assumption, given how much gas he appeared to have at the end), Kobe would have finished with 93 points." Kobe is in exceptional condition and could have played all 48 minutes, had Jackson wanted to run up the score. So my POV--backed by articles like this--is that he was playing at a pace that threatened Wilt's record. Your POV is that the record was not threatened. That's why I've deleted the sentence altogether. It's subjective and not NPOV.

I think this specific debate, actually, would be much better suited for the Wilt Chamberlain's 100-point game article.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 01:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

For my response, see [6]

Myasuda 23:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since you seem to be an active editor of the Nobel prize articles, your comments would be appreciated in Talk:Nobel Prize in Chemistry#RFC: Country – ambiguous or not. There is an editor who would like to remove all countries for Nobel laureates except for the one mentioned on the Nobel website. If no one objects, all of the Nobel prize articles may be changed to match that request (for consistency). panda 15:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I added it to the New Pages page, but didn't really think there was a place on the main project page to list new articles. Am I missing something? Cheers! Murderbike 23:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heh, no problem. I had actually forgotten about the New Pages section though, been awhile since I actually did something Washington oriented, so thanks for the reminder! Murderbike 02:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for alerting me to the problem with this sockpuppet case. I think I've fixed the problem and properly separated the data into two cases. If you have times, please check Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TyrusThomas4lyf (2nd)‎ and Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TyrusThomas4lyf (3rd)‎ and let me know if you see further problems. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mark. Regarding case #4, I've closed the case but I'm not too familiar with range blocks. It might not be a bad idea to consult with an admin with more familiarity with range blocks to see if it is appropriate here. -- Samir 00:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The last range block I saw in the log was by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. Maybe User:Ryulong and User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me, who seem to be quite knowledgeable when it comes to blocks? -- Samir 01:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Check out the page now. Any better? Little more of using my own words. Fond memories of my early days as an NBA fan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynameisphil (talk • contribs) 11:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Myasuda, I see you're making some substantial edits to the Columbia River article. Not sure if you're aware, but it's currently a Good Article candidate. As such, it's probably best to discuss changes on the talk page first -- not sure if there's a policy about this, that's just my opinion -- so that any editor doing a GA evaluation has a fairly stable version to evaluate.

In fact, if you have the time, I would very much appreciate if you would do a GA evaluation yourself. I've put a fair amount of work into the article over the last few months, and am hoping someone with a sharp and critical eye will give it a good once-over. Thanks for your interest! -Pete 03:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the compliment, and for your contributions! -Pete 17:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

FYI, it just made WP:GA. Thanks again for your work on the article! -Pete (talk) 06:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. I was just advising everyone to double check some of the edits they reversed. Zagalejo^^^ 00:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Since I have seen you reverting this user occasionally, I would like to ask you to help dealing with another banned user TyrusThomas4lyf sock edits. The edits can be seen here. Thanks. Chris! _ct 01:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. But I mean, do Wikipedia has some solutions to deal with these long term abuser? It is exhausting to deal with this every other days. Chris! _ct 02:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why did you revert the wikilink for marquee player for George McGinnis‎? DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am considering making the article but have not yet done enough research. I might ask what is the point in not wikilinking a non-existant article. If a reader might benefit from reading more about a subject, then it should be linked. If the article doesn't exist, then perhaps someone will see that red link and create it. If it's created but not linked here, then how will anyone know it's a blue link? Also please see Wikipedia:Most wanted articles and Wikipedia:Red link. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the tip on new Washington articles, I've added this one to the list. Mtsmallwood (talk) 05:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I got the results from RFCU. Confirmed, and IP blocked. He should be out of commission for awhile, if he comes back, let me know. —BoL 00:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

See the talk page. 91.84.221.238 (talk) 02:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion on Donald Boven. Will do!--Eva ^bd 14:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I blocked both accounts for a while — the latter for three months, as he had been very incivil in his edit summaries. Hopefully that will stop him for now.

We may have to start complaining to his ISP soon. Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again! — Myasuda (talk) 15:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This was cut off from the main Trailblazer page, right? Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 01:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks. Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 01:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

What do you think about this? Created by me... Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 03:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tonight or tommorrow morning (CST) I'll get started on the transaction pages. It'll probably take me a week to get all the transactions together, and by then, the Suns' will have probably traded Shaq to another club, and that will send a few thousand players to Phoenix, and so I'd have to add more. Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 03:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering if you could help me with this: List of transactions involving the Dallas Mavericks. I'm almost done with this year, but I have to figure out who they trade for draft picks (this year, not even started with other years). Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 16:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it does help. I forgot all about ESPN. I was about to go to FSN. Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 17:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I seem to be having some trouble. If it's not too much trouble, could you take a look? Basketball110 _{the pages I've messed up completely} 03:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You don't take barnstars at all? I've got one that's just dying for a place! B110 _{communicate (that means talk)} 03:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Basketball110 :) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

When did User talk:TyrusThomas4lyf join Wikipedia? Basketball110 :) 00:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, so I noticed on Dallas Mavericks. It's a big problem I see. Basketball110 :) 02:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You removed the line about Mark Wahlberg and PCP.

"When he was sixteen (again using racist language) while attempting to rob a pharmacy under the influence of PCP, Wahlberg knocked a middle aged Vietnamese man unconscious with a wooden stick, left another Vietnamese man permanently blinded in one eye, and attacked a security guard.[9][10][4]"

I understand that your edit was in good faith, however the citation is provided. It is citation [4] from Inside the Actors Studio. He mentions he was under the influence of PCP while robbing a pharmacy. If you watch to watch it you can find it on youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ6UaLh_Zpo 63.76.234.250 (talk) 14:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about? Who said that the link is insufficent and why do I need to research? Are attacking you me? 63.76.234.250 (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is wrong with the current footnote, it is use in many FAC articles? 63.76.234.250 (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, but the only reference online is from youtube, I dont know if that is relible (though it obivously is in this case). I'm not sure if I should add it, but feel free if you want to. 63.76.234.250 (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm assuming the external links he placed at the bottom were references? Sorry, I didn't see those immediately.   jj137 (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for the suggestions about my additions to the Harry Gallatin article. I will get to those citations as soon as I can!Fork Stab (talk) 23:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the footnote example.Fork Stab (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again for helping me out with the citations. I just added another citation using that example. Hopefully I don't run into any more problems.Fork Stab (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'm part of a group at UW in Computer Science trying to make editing in Wikipedia easier. I'd love to talk to you and other Wikipedians in the Seattle area about your practices. You can find my webpage at [7] and email me from there or you can post on my talk page. Kayur (talk) 23:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

We're trying to build at tool that make it easier to summarize information in wikipedia. One tool we are currently working on is a tool that automatically generates info boxes for pages. But what would be great is to talk to someone about this problem in general to get an idea of current practices and processes for editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayur (talk • contribs) 00:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would be fed up too, if I were you. I don't know how to deal with his stubborn oafishness, maybe I'll drop a line at the guys who know how to hard-ban ppl. This is getting way out of hand, we all deserve better. —Onomatopoeia (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update: I notified User:Kafziel. —Onomatopoeia (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you do something and undo all his Kobe Bryant edits from this morning.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I responded on my talk page regarding User:Paulinho28. here DiligentTerrier • talk |sign here 20:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just opened up a discussion as requested. —Onomatopoeia (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. He could come back, but with every ban, more users will grow annoyed of him. This will make banning quicker and more efficient, if TT4L himself does not change. —Onomatopoeia (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I saw your message, but I can't reply because of the block. I encountered his sock during editing, and thought that I should lend a hand. Frankly, I didn't expect to get blocked for doing the right thing. The admin who blocked me didn't check that out before doing anything. Anyway, thanks for your message. Next time I deal with another one of his sock, I will contact you or other admins. Thanks. Chris! _ct 21:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I blocked that IP for a month. I think we will have to open a long-term abuse section on him. Daniel Case (talk) 14:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for cleaning up my mess within the article. Hope I did not cause any serious incovenience. Take care. —Parisinos (talk) 8:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

You recently added the Boston Celtics 1965-66 NBA champions template to the Sihugo Green article. Can you confirm that Sihugo Green received a championship ring for the 1965-66 season? While he played in 10 regular season games for the Celtics that season, he did not play in any of their playoff games. My impression is that he was no longer on the roster during the playoffs and was thus not eligible for a championship ring. If you have evidence otherwise, please notify me. Thanks. — Myasuda (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

According to page 229 of this year's media guide, he was part of the team. And a player doesn't have to play in playoff games to be officially on a championship roster. He must just be under contract with the team during that time. Scot Pollard, for example, would get a ring if the Celtics won the championship this season, even though he won't play in the playoffs (out for season). ● 8~Hype ^@ 21:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am aware of everything you've stated. But you haven't provided evidence that Sihugo Green was still a part of the roster during the post-season. Incidentally, this is why Butler is not eligible for a ring (he was traded mid-season). However, I do have evidence that Sauldsberry was, so that's why he can remain on the 1965-66 championship template. — Myasuda (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It looks like you haven't been very careful with your updates. Several of the players you've added to the templates were traded mid-season. Please be more careful in the future. — Myasuda (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I will re-check the templates while keeping in mind the transactions. ● 8~Hype ^@ 00:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Curiously, even though Palazzi was sold during the season, he is listed as part of the 1956-57 Championship team. Here's the proof. So what shall we do? I think every Celtic player who appears on the Championship team rosters on the Celtics website should be added to the template (including Palazzi, even though he was sold). ● 8~Hype ^@ 15:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

With the 39th Annual Manzanar Pilgrimage coming up on April 26, I have nominated Manzanar to be on Wikipedia's main page on that date. Please add your support for that at Today's featured article requests. Thank you! -- Gmatsuda (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The nomination was removed intially because there can only be five nominations on that page, but it's back, so if you are so incllined, please offer your support. Thanks! -- Gmatsuda (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please accept this invite to join the Celtics WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Celtics. Simply click here to accept!

- Milk's favorite Cookie 19:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I struggled with prodding the rather silly article at Chicago Hawks; but the contributor's pattern clearly was vandalism only, the content was complete nonsense and utterly unverifiable, so I lumped it into the "obvious hoax" section of CSD G3. Apologies if this is stepping over your prod. Kuru ^talk 01:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to brother you, but I think I will need some help to deal with User:75.58.163.152 who is vandalizing and engaging in an editing war on Boston Celtics. Thanks in advance. —Chris! _ct 05:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Look like he stopped after I gave him a warning. Thanks anyway. —Chris! _ct 07:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, check out User:Fact finder 1780. This could be the reappearance of another TyrusThomas4lyf sockpuppet. Can you look into this when you have time, thanks.—Chris! _ct 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The reason for my cite on Moses Malone being the fourth player to play professional is because Tony Kappen was 27 years old whe he signed to play with in the BAA. That's not what I would really cal straight from high school in my book. While Graboski and Connie Simmons were 19 and 21 respectively. From a reasonable point of view I don't really think Kappen qualifies.(Thedraftreview (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC))Reply

Hello,

I wanted to let you know that I intend to take the Bill Russell article to WP:Featured article review. This is something I've been planning to do for a while. I'll list my rationale at the FAR page shortly, and send you a message when that discussion is live.

Thanks, Zagalejo^^^ 05:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bill Russell has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Zagalejo^^^ 06:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the section at WT:MATH because it consists almost entirely of attacks on myself. Please do not replace it. It serves no useful purpose to any wp content. I would like to diffuse this situation, not continue it. Be well, Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please don't update them. I have taken this task upon myself. ;) ● 8~Hype ^@ 16:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Myasuda. I was wondering if you could keep an eye on this page and tell me what you think of this dispute. Also please see my comment at Talk:Bob Lanier (basketball)#Quadruple Double. This user keeps citing an internet fourm post as its source, which ultimately cites Wikipedia itself as its source. This could even be a possible WP:BLP violation. Bash Kash (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thx. Bash Kash (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good catch. Thanks. I'll blame a lack of sleep . . . feel welcomed to assist with that and related pages!

Thank you very much, Mark, for your welcomed and very generous comments on Miné Okubo. The interesting part is that it's an article that I didn't plan to write—it just came along while I was working on another article, one that is only tangentially related to Okubo. I think Wiki might be addictive for me. It's a fabulous application of the internet. Regards, Wjwalrus (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mark, thanks for your support on the Talk:Topaz War Relocation Center#Terminology issue. — Wjwalrus (talk) 00:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mark, thanks for the update on this category. Perhaps you have found Yoko in "musicians". I added my initial thinking about this category at Category talk:Japanese American artists. Overall, it's not a big concern for me. If it makes sense to re-organize the cat, especially if you're adding to it, then be my guest. — Wjwalrus (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I noticed your purposeful use of quotation marks when referring to Yoko's "music." Perhaps her "art" warrants similar punctuation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjwalrus (talk • contribs) 21:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, why does that banned user have a grudge against you because via IP hes been labelling people socks of yourself. Were you the first person that spotted his antics and got him blocked? I can only assume so because i doubt he picked you at random. Cheers Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 08:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Both socks have been stuffed back in the drawer for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am quite certain that the ip 75.34.10.50 (talk · contribs · logs) is a sock of TyrusThomas4lyf. But so far there is no evidence tying him to TyrusThomas4lyf. I have already filed a checkuser report.—Chris! _ct 02:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you can find some evidences and show them on the checkuser report, it would be great. Thanks.—Chris! _ct 04:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, on 12 November 2007 you added a section to Pierogi, citing Hungarian folklore in connection with derelye. Could you please supply a reference for the story with Andras Perl and Katalin Banki? Thank you. --Zlerman (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Thanks for your prompt reply. Do you have any idea if this is legitimate information or just folklore (or worse)? I find many instances of Andras Perl and Katalin Banki as a pair of authors of scientific papers. I do not find anything on the 18th century story about a wedding and derelye. My inclination is to remove this piece. Any thoughts on the matter? --Zlerman (talk) 13:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks again. Please compare the text added on June 7, 2006: [8] to the text on Hungary on pieroguys.com. Uncanny, isn't it? This is the only place on the web where I can find Andras Perl and Katalin Banki in the pierogi (derelye) context. The anon user who added the content on June 7 has only this one item in his contribution list, but then maybe he became a registered user that same day... Still, looks suspicious. A citation needed tag is there already: I will do as you suggest pending deletion. Incidentally, derelye as such is perfectly legit, in case you were wondering. Regards, --Zlerman (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's been discussed a lot. In this case, it's much easier for all editors to keep with our long-standing code. Badagnani (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just let you know that there is another discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent vandalism by User:Chrishomingtang about TyrusThomas4lyf.—Chris! _ct 20:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link. Vapour (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you please assist me to add Speedy delivery to the "Asian Americans in the United States Military" that I created by mistake. Thank you very much. Tommy Nero Sullivan (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

We truly lost one of the greats and a real pioneer today. But I guess it was his time. It makes me sad to think that we will eventually lose Yuri, too. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 05:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry -- perhaps I should know this, but I'm not sure who you're referring to above. — Myasuda (talk) 13:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Richard Aoki of course. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, i am sorry, this is the first time i log in from a long time. Yeh i will try to upload it in the Arabic section. but there is someone who keeps changing the pic to another one in the English Amman —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amman12 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have no problem with the addition, and I agree Coach's total was probably higher. Some of the stats on this NBA page are odd (Jerry West with 81 career steals? Heh). Odder still, this official site is obviously updated all the time, as I track Jason Kidd slowly creeping up on Mark Jackson (though no one will probably ever topple Stockton's 15,806 - and that's just fine with me). Your dedication is fierce, and I won't alter the addition, but maybe there's a way to research it with the NBA statisticians (I see you're "into" mathematics by your credentials :>) to see why some of these stats are recorded like this. Coach Sloan didn't play 755 games in his last three seasons, and neither did West record 81 steals in 932 games and manage a 2.61 SPG average. Thanks for reminding me to reference my source - Peace... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc9871 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for helping me with my subpage list! :-) I didn't have it on my watchlist for some reason, and I looked at the history of the page today and I noticed you did some of the articles, thanks! Killiondude (talk) 06:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know, Category:Protected Areas of California articles without parameters now lists way more articles than my subpage does... My subpage may have a few articles that that category does, but only because they haven't been purged yet. Killiondude (talk) 05:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your additions to the List of Asian American Medal of Honor recipients. In making those additions you only provided partial information, I have improved upon that in the World War II section and will work on your other ones. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi buddy.

On the page of Japanese Canadian internment, it's known. That's the reason why I put it on "discussion" of Japanese Americans. Both of my Nisei parents were born in Seattle, WA (1908 for my father and 1915 for my mother). I moved up north to Canada in the late 60s.

Takima (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. In May 2006 you added Bruce Lee to the Asian American article. A recent new editor, Realwarrior, has challenged your addition as factually incorrect on the Asian American article's talk page. If you would like to join the discussion, please do so. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lret's remove it. I don't know how to do it

Takima (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

My objection is not about retaining differential geometry under the geometry section but instead about the form that its inclusion has. If you take a look at the sections Algebra or Analysis for example, all their subsections bear a title: e.g.: Theory of Equations, Abstract Algebra, Complex Analysis etc. But in Geometry there is a first part of works from different branches of geometry (elementary, synthetic, analytic, axiomatic) and the only subesction that bears a title is that of Diff. geom. For reasons of consistency, I would like the first subsection of Geometry to bear a title as well, but I doubt that there is such a generic term that covers all these oeuvres; perhaps Traditional geometry as opposed to Modern geometry (differential, algebraic, symplectic)? --Omnipaedista (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi; you just reverted my edit to Protected Areas of Washington and I posted a little note on the talk page there explaining why I'd added the link to The Enchantments in the first place. I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether there's a place for the link in that nav box. Thanks, W.stanovsky (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just went to Andy Gleason's page to put up a link to the Notices essays and discovered that you'd done it already. Thanks.

Ethan Bolker

Ebolker (talk) 15:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)ebolkerReply

Noted. If he becomes disruptive, I'll let you know. If not, I'll just leave him alone. Zagalejo^^^ 06:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I didn't subtract the avgs, but I did make a calculation mistake. Anyway, thanks for your correction.—Chris!_c/t 02:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I figured that since the ABA merged into the NBA, the articles would be under that WIkiProject. ~Richmond96 t • c 03:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bruce Lee. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You also misused the minor change flag by applying this to a change which you should have realised was likely to prove controversial, and your explanation "uncanny ability" is rather cryptic and I am genuinely unsure what you meant by it. PatGallacher (talk) 00:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, my mistake, I confused your edit with somebody else's edit. I have now warned the real culprit. PatGallacher (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Listing the teams to never lose in the NBA Finals is not Original Research as you stated. If I need a source, it is listed as an official record with the four teams I listed (Bulls 6-0, Spurs 4-0, Heat 1-0, Royals/Kings 1-0) in The Basketball Almanac, Kreismer (Red Letter Press, 2007). ShinyHubCaps (talk) 04:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Myasuda! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 243 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Larry Siegfried - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

UC San Diego has been a recurring candidate for the Universities Collaboration of the Month but it has been short the votes necessary to win on several occasions. If you'd like to see a concerted effort to improve the article on your alma mater, please drop by the collaboration page to cast your vote. Also feel free to help improve our current collaborations during their last few days. Cheers! -Mabeenot (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I think I figured out how to use the talk function. So, yeah, go to the NBA's Wikipedia page. Under "Teams", it shows that the Lakers franchise was founded in 1946, the asterik denoting a franchise move. Westsidelife (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm considering switching the list names back to a number-based title. Let me know what you think.Hoops gza (talk) 16:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for adding section breaks on the draft articles. I agree that section breaks are needed since the lead are becoming too long and wordy. However, I don't really like the section titles, it's too long and too descriptive. I am thinking of a shorter titles such as Draft selections, Draft overview or just Overview. The Draft section titles also could be changed into Draft board to make it clearer. Any thoughts on this? By the way, any reason why you stopped at 1979 NBA Draft? I would like to continue adding the section breaks to make every draft articles consistent. — MT (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree with all these changes.—Chris!_c/t 05:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good points. Recently I also have been thinking that the lead is becoming too long and wordy with draftees' future achievements mixed with the players selected. That's why in my most recent rewrite of the draft article, the 1981 NBA Draft, I started to have a separate paragraphs on the draft overview from the players future NBA achievements. I tried a new arrangement in that article that trimmed down the lead significantly. Any thoughts on this? If this structure is working then I'll try to restructure the older draft articles to make it consistent. — MT (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anyway, I've raised a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Basketball Association#Draft articles structure. Please have a look there. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks! — MT (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do you know if there is a way to lock particular sections of articles so that only certain editors can edit them? This would be very helpful for certain sections, for instance, the career highs of retired basketball players will never change.Hoops gza (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

One of the many control freaks that have given Wikipedia a bad reputation for reliable information. Why did you revert the change I made about Monterey Park, CA? It is a fact that it has such high concentration of Asian Americans. Why don't you people stop it? Every time I've tried to contribute with something it gets reverted. You're so paranoid about trolls that you're actually becoming more annoying than honorable to the original purpose of collective work. Ignoring data just because you don't like how it looks should be a sin, really. 72.1.137.178 (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian-American history#Move request. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})Reply

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#South Asian Americans are not considered Asian Americans. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})Reply