Mihai Andrei

I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an article reference. Denni ☯ 20:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

• Again, I have no idea what you mean. I have never edited any article even remotely resembling what you're talking about. I have never even heard of "Inochentie" (slavic resonance) or "Inocentiu" (latin resonance). What makes you think I do? Denni ☯ 21:07, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Salut, I realy appreciate your corrections done on the Sibiu article and your work on the Transylvanian Personalties, mabye we could make an article. Until then, if you can spare some time, can you have a look at the Culture of Romania article on which I've been working on lately and could you make some corrections if necesary. Multzam fain --Orioane 13:37, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vad ca ai gasit cum poti sa editezi un template. :D Despre link-ul de la Supplex, am lasat doar Cluj, dar am pastrat link-ul catre Cluj Napoca, iar despre intelectualii ardeleni din secolul al XVIII-lea şi al XIX-lea am incercat sa pastrez un NPOV si a trebuit sa scriu ceva si despre ceea ce se intampla in zona fanariota, si precum vezi, exemplul principal e Lazar. Oricum, proportia pentru partea de inceput acolo e mai mare spre Ardeal, dar nu m-am putut intinde mai mult deoarece risc sa fac un articol mult prea lung. --Orioane 14:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 19:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Mihai -- I accidentally reverted your edit to this article while cleaning up some vandalism. I've restored the link to the Romanian article now. Perodicticus 14:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I am honored to see that you made a Viktor Dankl article for the Romanian Wikipedia. I hope my article was of help to you.

Would you be interested in helping the Military Order of Maria Theresia article? I noticed you have done one in Romanian.--GregRog 14:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The lady's name in English is usually Maria Theresa, as seen in the article of that name, and there's also the Maria Theresa thaler. AnonMoos 17:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I like the "Theresia" spelling, it's more Roman, but I don't think Im responsible for making that call, oh well

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Romanian Orthodox Church. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. —Mets501^talk 17:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry if I removed content that was correct from the article. If you were in fact deleting incorrect content, feel free to put it back in the article. The reason it appeared to be vandalism was because there was an empty edit summary. Please make sure that you either enter an edit summary or write about a large delete on the talk page of the article so it is not reverted in the future. —Mets501^talk 19:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

În 17 septembrie va fi referendum în Transnistria legat de independenţa regiunii. Cu această ocazie probabil multă lume va căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre Transnistria. Am încercat să adaug în articol nişte informaţii legate de acest referendum, anume:

- faptul că mai multe organizaţii antiseparatiste au lansat un apel la boicotare, considerînd referendumul "farsă"

- faptul că din 46 de ţări membre ale Consiliului Europei, 45 sînt împotriva recunoaşterii referendumului, numai RUsia are altă părere

- faptul că datele Comisiei Electorale Centrale din Tiraspol au fost schimbate în mod ciudat, anume numărul total de alegători s-a micşorat cu 7% faţă de 2005, ceea ce ridică suspiciuni asupra unei încercări de creştere artificială a prezenţei la vot prin raportarea unui număr mai mic de alegători înregistraţi.

Totdeauna am dat lincurile care dovedesc cele scrise de mine, n-am născocit nimic din burtă.

Userul Willian Mauco, care pare fan Tiraspol, mereu mi-a şters adăugirile. (vezi istoria paginii)

Puteţi vedea la pagina de discuţii Transnistria ce argumente a adus. Anume: ăia care cer boicotarea referendumului din Transnistria sînt foşti KGB-işti, că aşa zice o organizaţie rusească de analiză (a dat un linc pentru asta). Întîi a spus că respectivii nici nu sînt din Transnistria, ci doar din Basarabia, dar i-am dovedit că unii dintre semnatarii apelului la boicot sînt transnistreni. Am fost împăciuitor, i-am zis că n-are decît să adauge părerea organizaţiei ruseşti că antiseparatiştii sînt foşti KGBişti, că n-are decît să-i considere pe cei care vor boicotarea referendumului drept băieţi răi, dar faptul în sine, că s-a cerut boicotarea referendumului, trebuie menţionat. Degeaba, mereu mi s-au şters adăugirile - pentru celelalte 2 fapte nici n-a adus argumente.

A mai fost o adăugire care a şters-o, despre arestarea a 4 persoane din Transnistria care sînt împotriva separatismului (între timp li s-a dat drumul). În cazul ăsta am renunţat eu să mai insist pentru includerea informaţiei în articol (deşi informaţia e incontestabilă), tocmai fiindcă n-am vrut să mă cert prea mult.

În perioada asta cînd agenţiile de ştiri vor menţiona referendumul de la Tiraspol, se va citi articolul Transnistria în Wikipedia poate mai mult decît într-un an întreg. De aia acum e nevoie să existe în articol informaţii despre contestarea corectitudinii referendumului. Nu cer să se menţioneze ca adevăr absolut faptul că referendumul e incorect, ci doar că există unii (OSCE, 45 din 46 ţări ale Consiliului Europei, unele organizaţii din zonă şi din Basarabia) care consideră asta. Vă cer de aceea sprijinul ca să interveniţi pe pagina de discuţii Transnistria pentru a susţine rămînerea informaţiei în pagină şi să repuneţi informaţia atunci cînd Mauco o şterge (eu nu pot să verific chiar 24 de ore din 24). Evitaţi atacurile suburbane, păstraţi ton civilizat. mulţumesc.

Who is William Mauco Here is an article about a Wikipedia celebrity, William Mauco, and his relations with the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS), an organisation "which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria" (quote from the article) http://0.bypass-filter.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZGx1Y2FzLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8yMDA2LzA4L2dvdGNoYS0yLmh0bWw%3D

Edward Lucas wrote about Mauco: "The other lead is William Mauco. He has an extensive record of posting intelligent and fairly neutral entries on Wikipedia, not only about TD but about other unrecognised statelets. Crucially, these predate ICDISS's birthday of January 2006. And he also claims to have been at their conference in Mexico City in April of this year. I have written to him asking to get in touch, and had a friendly email in reply. I am planning to follow up this research in an article in European Voice at the end of August, so watch this space!"--MariusM 08:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great comments on the topic of the 1848 Revolution on Biruitorul's talk page (I wholeheartedly agree). I never really knew if Tell was a Saxon - I think the info you provided deserves a mention on the article on him, and we should include him in the German-Romanians and Transylvanian Saxons. Do you have sources for that? Many thanks. Dahn 04:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiperit en Klus.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

First read the whole site: http://www.talmamedia.com/ You have there more data, the census results there are indeed from 1910 (I compared them with some Serbian sources that I have, and results are correct). Second, check the map: http://www.talmamedia.com/map/hhcounty/images/megyek1/35kotor.gif You can see there differences between city area and municipal area. And finally, check table again: http://www.talmamedia.com/php/district/district.php?county=Kolozs The 4th line from the top is named "Kolozsvári" (that is statistics for municipal area, while statistics for the city area is in the first line from the bottom named "Kolozsvár cmr."). Regarding the percents, I calculated them by myself - you can calculate percents by yourself too by this formula:

• step 1: total number/100=1%
• step 2: number of ethnic group/1%= percent of ethnic group.

It is very easy. :)) PANONIAN (talk) 19:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Draga Mihai Andrei, nu am sustinut niciodata asta. Nici eu, nici versiunea pe care o schimbai. Dahn 18:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the correction. --KIDB 22:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiperit en Klus.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

As it clearly says on commons, you have to upload an image under its original license, and you have two choices: GFL and PD. The original image was uploaded with CC, which means that you did not tell the truth about the license. Either ask the uploader to change the license or let it go. Dahn (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Here is a voting about Bendery/Bender/Tighina: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bender%2C_Moldova#Statement_of_Title_Solution --80.142.252.220 (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Communes and villages in Transylvania, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Communes and villages in Transylvania has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Communes and villages in Transylvania, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag transsylvania.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Sigiliul orasului liber Cluj.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited St. Michael's Cathedral, Alba Iulia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Pacat ca nu pot sa fac o simpla miscare fara a fi acuzat, in reversul stilului stalinist, de tendinte comuniste; de buna credință nu ati auzit cumva? Pur si simplu nu cunosteam toate sursele relevante; asta nu implica nimic sinistru. Acum ca m-am documentat, am sa mut, dar totusi, lucrurile se pot discuta si in termeni tehnici (sursa cutare versus sursa cutare), nu doar polemici (rasunete comuniste, etc). - Biruitorul ^Talk 18:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nu face nimic, ne mai enervam cu totii din cand in cand. Cu stima, Biruitorul ^Talk 19:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Salut, stii cumva Wikipedianii Romani?

Eu gasesc tot felul de intentii de a schimba datele istorice despre romania si Transilvania: de exemplu la articolul despre Sigismund bathory se spune ca el a infaptuit primul unirea Transilvaniei, Tarii Romanesti si Moldovei... La acelasi articol un Engleza se spune ca Mihai Viteazul a semnat subordonarea Tarii Romanesti Transilvaniei...

Cineva face aceste lucruri intentionat, nu exista cineva care le verifica?

Dino alx (talk) 07:21, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Igriș Abbey to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Paris1127 (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Do you have time to create / improve some seasons in Cupa României, there are many seasons missing. You can try create the edition when U Cluj won. Thanks.Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Salut! Sa stii ca in secolul al XVIII-lea s-au asezat in Transilvania mai multi calugari greci care au intrat in comuniune cu Roma. La Blaj este atestat ieromonahul Leontios (Leontie) Moschonas, un invatat calugar grec din insula Naxos, care a venit la Blaj impreuna cu episcopul Inocențiu Micu-Klein, care l-a numit arhimandrit. Moschonas a pus bazele bibliotecii din Blaj. In anul 1747 a indeplinit o misiune oficiala pentru Petru Pavel Aron. Romanii din comuna Peris (Nasaud) i-au adresat o scrisoare, in care i s-au plans ca sasii ii obliga sa tina sarbatorile sasesti (vezi V. Sotropa, Arhiva Someseana nr. 18, pag. 285). Moschonas a murit la Blaj in 1758. Amanunte in: Nicolae Iorga, Histoire des Roumains de Transylvanie et de Hongrie, II, pag. 148 si Nicolae Albu, Istoria invatamantului romanesc din Transilvania, pag. 178. Tot un calugar grec unit cu Roma a infiintat si ro:Mănăstirea Bixad. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 08:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Interesante informatii, nu stiam, iti multumesc pentru ele.

In legatura cu articolul despre biserica, am sa va rog cu insistenta sa va probati afirmatia ca ar fi fost o biserica greco-catolica pana la 1948 folosind surse de incredere. Aceasta mai ales avand in vedere ca sursa principala pe care m-am bazat, desi nu una academica, este totusi de incredere, si afirma in mod explicit ca erau ortodocsi ctitorii - afirmatie pe care ati sters-o. Ca sa fie clar, eu nu am nici o problema in a recunoaste ca a fost initial greco-catolica, daca intr-adevar a fost, dar nu cred ca impun o conditie nerezonabila daca cer si o sursa in acest sens. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Augustin Bunea explica in volumul sau despre Inocentiu Micu ca bisericuta grecilor a fost ridicata din materialele de constructie ramase nefolosite la ridicarea Catedralei din Blaj. Din pacate nu am la indemana volumul respectiv. Prima biserica ortodoxa din Blaj a fost ridicata in perioada interbelica. Insusi faptul ca in cimitirul bisericutei grecilor a fost inmormantat mitropolitul Alexandru Sterca-Sulutiu ar trebui sa fie o sursa de incredere privind cultul pe seama caruia a fost construit lacasul respectiv. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Am rezolvat. In cateva saptamani voi primi de la München "Sematismul pe anul 1911", astfel incat voi putea cunoaste numele parohului bisericii respective in perioada antebelica. Referitor la toponimul "al grecilor" legat de Blaj, chiar locul cunoscut dupa 1848 drept "Campul Libertatii", acesta s-a numit anterior "Râtul grecilor" (probabil ca a fost proprietatea vreunei manastiri din Blaj). Vezi ultimul rand din pag. 2 a acestui document: [1]. Sfarsitul documentului, pe pag. 3, arata ca inmormantarea canonicului Ratiu, oficiata in cimitirul Bisericii Grecilor, a fost prezidata de insusi mitropolitul de la acea vreme. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Daca reusesti sa faci rost de volumul lui Bunea si sa il citezi, ar fi bine. Oricum, graba nu e. La fel cu Sematismul.

Sigur, m-am gandit si eu ca prezenta a mai multor fruntasi greco-catolici din cimitir trebuie sa implice ceva. Poate insemna, cum sugerezi, ca biserica a fost infiintata de BRU si ca a ramas in posesia ei pana la 1948. Dar alte explicatii sunt cel macar plauzibile: s-a infiintat ca biserica ortodoxa si a trecut la greco-catolicism dupa o anumita vreme; sau biserica era ortodoxa dar cimitirul mixt. Poate ca cimitirul chiar era al statului si nu a bisericii.

Ideea e ca putem specula mult si bine, dar as vrea surse ca sa lamurim faptele.

(update): Nu ai rezolvat chiar asa bine. In primul rand, te rog sa nu manipulezi sursele. Banuiesc ca nu te-ai uitat nici la Iorga, nici la Cristache-Panait, ci numai la Dumitran. In acest caz, te rog sa te limitezi la a cita ceea ce ai analizat tu insusi. Pe urma, corect este sa spui ceea ce spune sursa, nu sa tragi alte concluzii dupa ea. Am corectat eu. In al doilea rand, tot pe acolo am ramas: cu o singura sursa care afirma ca erau ortodocsi ctitorii, si alta care ne povesteste despre greco-catolicii inmormantati in cimitir. Daca iese altceva la iveala, sa adaugam pe parcurs. In al treilea rand, chiar si daca vor aparea surse care afirma apartenenta ei la BRU in trecut, nu o-sa scriem ca este "a Romanian Greek-Catholic Church", din simplul motiv ca, in ziua de astazi, nu este. Ca a ajuns pe mainile BOR prin metode abuzive, criminale, totalitare, ce vrei, e una - dar este, in momentul actual, o biserica ortodoxa, asa cum Hagia Sophia este un muzeu, nu o catedrala ortodoxa. (Apropos, oare BRU a facut vreun demers ca sa ii fie retrocedata? Ca doar e la doi pasi de resedinta mitropolitana.) - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Da, am citit acum doar articolul doamnei Dumitran. Am trecut celelalte surse pentru ca cei doritori sa le aiba la indemana. Pacat ca le-ai sters. Insemnarile de calatorie ale lui Nicolae Iorga (pe care le-am citit mai demult) sunt edificatoare. De unde ai tras concluzia ca Biserica Grecilor din Blaj ar fi fost initial neunita (ortodoxa), nu stiu. In articolul doamnei Dumitran scrie clar ca episcopul Inocentiu Micu a incheiat un contract de construire a unui iconostas in 1737, cand catedrala inca nu era nici macar inceputa. Or ca sa pui un iconostas intr-o biserica, iti trebuie biserica. Iar daca biserica ar fi fost mai veche, neunita (ortodoxa), atunci cu siguranta ca n-ar fi avut nevoie nici de episcopul Micu, nici de iconostas. Daca nu vrei sa mergi pe calea logicii, atunci asteptam sematismul... --Mihai Andrei (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC) PS. Daca biserica ar fi existat inainte de unirea cu Roma, atunci tam-tam-ul facut de istoriografia pravoslavnica ar fi fost similar cu cel legat de Biserica din Fagaras, ctitorita de Constantin Brancoveanu si devenita catedrala unita (sub Ioan Giurgiu). Ma deranjeaza faptul ca site-ul Primariei Blaj, ca si agentia Agerpres de altfel, vor sa transforme pe sest aceasta biserica in biserica ortodoxa, disimuland realitatea si mizand pe faptul ca este numita in popor "a grecilor". --Mihai Andrei (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Am sters celelalte surse nu din reavointa sau in mod arbitrar, ci pentru ca asa se procedeaza: citam ceea ce folosim si putem cita, nu si materialul autorilor respectivi. Eu de fapt nu am tras si nici nu am inclus o astfel de concluzie: forma prezenta a articolului spune doar ca a fost finantata, in parte, de aromâni ortodocsi. Teoretic, puteau sa dea bani si calvini si lutherani si evrei daca asa isi doreau, fara ca biserica sa le apartina. Nu spun explicit ca era unita sau neunita, pentru ca nu am gasit vreo sursa in acest sens. Inainte sa analizam articolul, trebuie sa ne amintim de ceva: biserica actuala e de la 1770, asa ca daca vorbim de 1737, ne referim la biserica anterioara. Iar ceea ce spune Dumitran e urmatorul lucru: ca Cristache-Panait a afirmat ca iconostasul din biserica grecilor e acela executat prin contractul incheiat intre Micu si Stefan de la Ocnele Mari — si ca Porumb a venit cu opt ani mai tarziu si a infirmat aceasta concluzie. Crede-ma, interesul meu nu este sa fiu vag, asa cum lipsa materialului ma obliga sa fiu deocamdata. As fi extrem de incantat sa am la indemana un text care sa imi povesteasca cum Securitatea a navalit in biserica intr-o duminica din octombrie 1948, l-a arestat pe preot, i-a pus sub urmarire pe enoriasi, si a dat cheia unui preot ortodox. As vrea sa adaug astfel de material cu lux de amanunt. Dar din pacate, nu pot inventa surse, asa ca ma limitez la a afirma ceea ce imi permit sursele disponibile. - Biruitorul ^Talk 01:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adineauri am verificat in lista de la Rameti (inaintata de episcopatul unit colegilor ortodocsi in iunie 1999, cu bisericile revendicate), iar biserica Ss. Arhangheli din Blaj se afla la pozitia 12 in sectiunea "biserici protopopiale" pentru Arhidieceza de Fagaras si Alba Iulia. Din cele 18 biserici cerute, au fost restituite doar doua, anume cea de la pozitia 4 (ro:Biserica Sf. Vasile cel Mare din București) si cea de la pozitia 6 (Biserica Sf. Nicolae din Ocna Mures). Amandoua restituirile au avut loc dupa procese interminabile, cu nervi si scandal. Din pacate si retrocedarea catedralelor din Baia Mare si Gherla s-a impotmolit, dupa ce chiar patriarhul Teoctist a promis restituirea lor. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 08:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Mihai Andrei in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 15:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi i saw that you used the above terms in the article Nicula Monastery. I have found no sources to attest that these feasts are called this in English, it may be a literal translation from Romanian, do you have any sources that would help? Domdeparis (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello.

I am making an unblock request for my Wikipedia account (ro.wikipedia.org).

The block was made by Ionutzmovie. The reason given is Abuz utilizare conturi multiple (Sock puppetry): Fermă „Pești”.

 Start of block: 00:03, 30 November 2016
 Expiration of block: infinite
 Intended blockee: 188.208.118.0/23

I have not used multiple accounts. This is the only account I have used.

Thank you very much. --RoyaltyBox 04:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Dvs sunteti acesta? https://ro.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:Mihai_Andrei dacă da, aș vrea să comunic ceva cu dvs, așa că vă rog să-mi spuneți unde e mai ok. Aici sau pe o adresă de email. Vă mulțumesc ! RAMSES$44932 (talk) 13:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply