Jean.julius

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Iraq Petroleum Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chevron

Total S.A. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MOU

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi ... The BE article is a Featured Article and one of the mundane things which had to be done to it to get that status was to follow the WP:Manual of Style and to maintain consistency of references. To that end, would you mind fixing the refs you added to follow the existing style? ie add the ref to the section at the end with a #ref tag and then refer to that ref in the text. Thanks! The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick ^t 00:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, ok. Let me have a look and understand how to use #ref tag and fix it. Jean Julius Vernal 10:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Great Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superpowers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate the work you are doing but that model is dubious even for some social science applications. It would be different for biology, etc. etc There isn't one specific agreed model at the moment, but there are various approaches. Better no picture than a picture that is at best orientated towards one view of social systems. ----Snowded ^TALK 23:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and noted. Please note few questions out of my genuine inquisitiveness. I would appreciate your comments and suggestions A) In case of complex adaptive organization, the biological aspect you mentioned above (If I understand it as ant colonies, bacteria or viruses) is not in the context of the article. And, we are dealing the subject in terms of management, and strategy. If that is the case, the figure - Doesnt it give a basic understanding of "the behaviour" of the CAS, and highlight the two important properties - "Self Organization" and "Emergence"? . A complicated or a detailed figure, wouldn't it be difficult for a beginner? B) Next one is a comment for the sentence - "By managing behaviour not content WIkipedia uses simple rules to produce a complex, evolving knowledge base which has largely replaced older sources in popular use". In case of wikipedia, Aren't we all managing behavior on top of content? A sentence like ""By managing behaviour, and not only mere content, Wikipedia" .. Your thoughts please. Jean Julius Vernal 01:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Give me a couple of days. Wiped out this week in Auckland, then on a very long flight to Brazil. Will take a copy of the pages and have a look them over the weekend. ----Snowded ^TALK 02:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Have a good week! Jean Julius Vernal 08:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dave Snowden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Complexity theory

History of the oil industry in India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trickle-down theory

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eastern Bank Ltd (Bangladesh) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Equity

Saudi Aramco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chevron

The BOC Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Britain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Globally Integrated Enterprise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duplication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jacqueline Bhabha‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Jamesneilanderson (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Let me have a look why is it proposed for deletion. It shouldn't be the case 16:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I've reverted your edit. In future, please remember WP:BRD and when your edit is reverted you need to go to the talk page to discuss, rather than just revert again. This is the English language Wiki and we do not need to dumb down our language or approach for those who cannot understand terms. "Hacking" is fairly straightforward and the context in which the term sits is also straightforward and to break it down further is just unneccessary. - SchroCat (^ • @) 15:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

So be it. Jean Julius Vernal 15:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aveva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visualisation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion regarding the lead paragraph on the talk page of Sony Pictures Entertainment. As a previous editor of this article your input would be appreciated. Regards. MisterShiney ✉ 08:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

My suggestions " Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (SPE) is a global television and film production/distribution unit based in Culver City, California of Japanese multinational technology and media conglomerate Sony. " or " Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (SPE), based in Culver City, California, United States, is a global television and film production/distribution unit of Japanese multinational technology and media conglomerate Sony. "Jean Julius Vernal 10:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Church of St Mary of the Angels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of St Mary of the Angels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mkdw^talk 06:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

you're more than welcome. A notable article is always worth saving In ictu oculi (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [1]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David J. Schwartz (motivational writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J. Schwartz (motivational writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN alt (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Theories of economics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Connectivism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complexity theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fifth Industrial Revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifth Industrial Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok, noted. Please allow me a few hours. I shall join the discussion later in the day and provide my point of view. My reply shall be 'Keep' and 'Disambiguate'. Regards, Jean Julius Vernal 13:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gentlemen Hope you folks got an one page summary. Now smoke that proof out of it. Jean Julius Vernal 02:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Catherine MacGregor

added links pointing to French, Scottish, Basque, Corsican and Oil recovery

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estelle Brachlianoff, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages COO and Greater Paris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proof (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Believe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jordan Hitch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable businessman

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Let me recap why I added that. Since it was added at least twelve years ago, I'm unable to recall its relevance. I'll review it to see if it can be improved, if time permits. If you believe it isn't worth keeping, feel free to delete it. However, it's generally advisable to either keep or improve it. Unfortunately, Wikipedia editors often prefer to delete an article rather than put in the effort to improve it. The person who created it may not have the time to edit it, but if the knowledge is valuable, it should be preserved. I'm drawing from my recent experience with an article on Industry 5.0—it was completely mishandled by a group of individuals who lacked understanding. 10:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Jean Julius Vernal 10:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply