Jean-Frédéric
Hello, Jean-Frédéric, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gilliam 21:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC) |
Re: Interwikis in Templates
editI understand. I wasn't sure why they were in there in the first place, now I know. Thanks, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Nice find!
editWell done finding the Kullman image. I made it display a little smaller so that it does not dominate the rest of the article. – ukexpat (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Request regarding commons
editHi. I noticed that you are an administrator on Commons, so I decided to apply to you with this request. My commons account is blocked for several days and nobody responds to my unblock request. Could you please address the issue here. Thank you very much in advance. -- Ashot (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- This problem has already been resolved. -- Ashot (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost
editHi Jean-Frédéric: thanks heaps for your story on the BnF. I've just copy-edited it. My impression is that it's very very technical. I wonder whether it's possible to bring it down a notch or two—through brief explanations or substitutions of the abbreviated items—so tech-dummies like me can get a sense of the basic technical challenges, achievements, etc. I can go through it again if you want to leave inline suggestions next to mine, or whatever you feel is easiest for you. Tony (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Tony,
- Thanks for the copy-editing : as I am not a native, I’m sure it needed a good prose polishing!
- Being so much involved in the project, I do not find it that technical. I mean, it could have been worse: the technical report we are writing at the moment is already 16-pages long ;-). But I do trust your judgement on that.
- The thing is, this is really an update on the technical part, which is now finished after five months. The 'political' part is done since April, and there is nothing fancy happening on the Wikisource end: they are, well, proofreading stuff, as usual. (If we hit someday some milestone, I'll get back to the Signpost to see if this can be of interest).
- There was really no technical challenge in this final, August part (just some time to spend). Maybe it is why we did that that would be of interest? I am not sure what I can do to make it a better story, so maybe you can improve it with the following?
- TIFF files : DjVu is the format used by Wikisource. To be proofread, books just have to be in that format. But it appeared to us that it would be good practice to save the original, unaltered files that we were entrusted with, otherwise they would be lost forever. Especially since there really is a huge quality loss in the conversion process.
- extraction : When we realised we could do it, we though it would be very cool :-p (now that sounds so geeky!). There is no easy way to do that afterwards except for contributors to download the big, multi-page book, use some obscure software to cut the images, etc. Wikisource folks are bent into making the exact same final book, and we also thought that some illustrations could be of interest for all projects. It was meant to do the most of this partnership, for other people (eg WP editors) with different material (images instead of books).
- As for "relative interest", I was not sure how to put it. We extracted many stuff like the library stamping of the books or the like (which were not part of the original books). I though this was useless, but a Wikisource friend was all like "Are you kidding? I want this!". So what I am trying to say is that type of illustrations may not sound awesome like portraits of maps, but that they really are interesting for some.
- As for the end : as at first we believed we would just upload all the stuff, we did not think of any communication channel. The image files are stacked on my computer and somewhere on the Toolserver. Users can ask us on a per-book basis, and we send the files by e-mail, so it is already "possible". But it would be more convenient to have files freely accessible (that is what we are investigating).
- I am not sure I help you that much, but let me know if I can be of more help.
- Jean-Fred (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Do you know the WP.fr equivalent page to our featured article candidates page? We are looking for foreign WPians who speak English pretty well and come from similar processes. The idea is to invite them, every so often, to be our judge for Choice of the week. My French is not very good, and it takes a while to get to know who's suitable to ask. If you know, please buzz me by email. Tony (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Congrats...
editGee, the French project sure has been in the news a lot lately =) Look here, now they broke 1,000,000 articles! Congrats: anything you want to add to the Signpost story? ResMar 02:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
SP article
editThx. I can integrate those points later; are you inserting the final instalment of the article? Tony (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I see also that Reaper Eternal and SMasters have been copy-editing the text (I put in a plea at the Guild of Copy Editors). You might let them know when you've done the rest, because I'll be asleep. You could even name them ... "Jean-Frederic, with X and Y", at the top, depending on whether they contribute enough. It's very nice of them to help!
Merry Christmas!
editWishing you all the very best for the season. Thanks for all your help and support this year. Merry Christmas and may Santa be good to you! – SMasters (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC) Click to play! |
A kitten for you!
editun petit chaton pour toi, peluche :-)
The WLM award
editBecause, yes, we can ! | |
Trizek here or on wpfr 22:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC) |
- C'est marrant leur truc... Ça ferait hurler les francophones ! XD Trizek here or on wpfr 22:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Riin Tamm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riin Tamm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riin Tamm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NickCT (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Testing new talk page
editDoes it work this way ?
Pymouss Let's talk 18:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- It does! Jean-Fred (talk) 22:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
editFile:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 28.JPG | Cute Plush Barnstar |
Because you're awesome :) Léna (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC) |
replied
editI left a reply for you at commons:User_talk:Jean-Frédéric#File:Brenda_at_TEDx_2011.JPG czar ♔ 03:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
WIR A+F
edit
Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Jean-Frédéric. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
(Delivered 14:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Denkmalpflege/Deutschland/Bayern/Ungenutzte Bilder
editThere seems to be something wrong with the bot, as de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Denkmalpflege/Deutschland/Bayern/Ungenutzte Bilder has gone to 0. Agathoclea (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Agathoclea: Thanks for letting me know, and for filing a Phab task :) I will look into it. Jean-Fred (talk) 10:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
nl:Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Erfgoed/Nederlandse Erfgoed Inventarisatie/Ongebruikte foto's
editAs above there seems something wrong since 5 september as well for nl:Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Erfgoed/Nederlandse Erfgoed Inventarisatie/Ongebruikte foto's. It generates a list, but almost immediately afterwards it clears the whole page. Please correct it for this page. HenkvD (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- @HenkvD: Thanks for letting me know. I have submitted a patch for that − once gerrit:378982 is reviewed, merged and deployed the report will behave normally.
- Jean-Fred (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2017, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
ErfgoedBot is wiping all of the unused images pages
editErfgoedBot's latest run is claiming that there are 0 unused images/commons categories on every page that it updates. Not sure what changed, but I'm letting you know in case you weren't already aware. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 13:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, this is linked to some database connection issues. Things should be back to normal for the underlying issue is not solved. This is tracked at phab:T180833. Jean-Fred (talk) 15:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Jean-Frédéric. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Jean-Frédéric. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editWikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
Your bot
editI've blocked your bot because it is not approved for use. If I have missed something, please let me know, otherwise file a Bot request. To discuss the matter more widely, visit WP:BOTN. Primefac (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Thanks for letting me know. I must say I’m a bit surprised − I took over this bot from User:Multichill 5 years ago, and has been running for 9 years in total. But fair enough ; I’ll see whether I get around filing a BRFA at some point. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 10:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was a little surprised as well, I guess it managed to slip through the cracks. Thanks for the understanding :-) Primefac (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Was there a change in bot policy in those 9 years that would explain the situation? As the bot never edited article space it was only visible to those that actively followed its pages (even if not in its user space) on purpose. Agathoclea (talk) 07:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was a little surprised as well, I guess it managed to slip through the cracks. Thanks for the understanding :-) Primefac (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- I filed Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ErfgoedBot. Jean-Fred (talk) 08:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you for your cooperation in this. Given the length of time this bot has been operating without any obvious issue, I'll leave it open for a day or so to allow other comment, and then likely approve the task. Primefac (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- How soon can the bot clean up NRHP list Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einbierbitte (talk • contribs)
- @Einbierbitte: The bot automatically runs every night. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- OK thanks Einbierbitte (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there are still some problems with it. On the page Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum, it often throughs files out of alphabetical order. That makes the files harder to search for, harder to tag, and harder to remove. I really would like you to fix this issue if you can. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK thanks Einbierbitte (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Einbierbitte: The bot automatically runs every night. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- How soon can the bot clean up NRHP list Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einbierbitte (talk • contribs)
- Excellent, thank you for your cooperation in this. Given the length of time this bot has been operating without any obvious issue, I'll leave it open for a day or so to allow other comment, and then likely approve the task. Primefac (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
ErfgoedBot
editI have noticed that many pictures in the Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum there are pictures that already have the NRHP template the bot does not remove. Many were given the template by the bot years ago(example File:250_Joachim_Street_Richards_DAR_House_Mobile_AL_01.JPG which was done in 2011 bot added the template) and still shows up in the list the bot creates. We delete it from the list and the bot returns it. It's like the template is invisible. I don't know what is causing that Einbierbitte (talk) 18:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, that is strange... Can you file a task on Phabricator for this? This needs investigation. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know what that means Einbierbitte (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I can tell you this; File:Bellerose Village Municipal Complex 2012-09-27 jeh.jpg has been tagged ever since it was uploaded as far as I know, and yet it still shows up on the list. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know what that means Einbierbitte (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter
editThe WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2022, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Problem
editHello Jean-Frédéric, I noticed a misinterpretation of this file in the article on Robespierre on the French Wikipedia. It is clearly dated 7 Nivôse, most likely written in December 1793, perhaps 27 December 1792:
On December 26, 1793, Moyse Bayle supported Barère's proposal on suspects, but Thomas-Augustin de Gasparin was already executed. I checked Retronews:
I have no idea who Gérard is, or the young hussard. Maybe you can help me?Taksen (talk) 04:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)