Joel Russ

Hi Joel,

There's a lot of work coming up w.r.t. the Whole Earth Catalog. I hope you will be able to help with it! +sj+ 06:23, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Just ran into Stewart Brand at MIT today, thanked him for releasing copyright on the original texts. The imaegs are still mighty hard to run OCR on...

Hi, saw you have been making a series of improvements to the Aldous Huxley entry. I'd be interested in hearing what you think of the pair of comments I made down the bottom of Talk:Aldous Huxley. I think the article gives the wrong impression in a couple points but don't really consider myself qualified to make that judgement definitively. Rkundalini

Hi Joel,

I saw you put in the link to Pellet stove. I've raised a question about low-cost variations on Talk:Pellet_stove - in case you have anything to contribute. Cheers --Singkong2005 02:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel Russ,

You recently contributed to the Shoghi Effendi article and added a statement about his connection with Richard St. Barbe Baker. Could you please add some kind of reference for the statement? I don't doubt that it's true, but it will likely be deleted without a reference, even if the reference is just an off-site link, or a book title. Cuñado   - Talk 16:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel, I must thank you instead. You did the brunt of the work improving the R. St. Barbe Baker article. He was indeed a great person. I definitely know that you were not trying to leave out the Baha'i Faith, as it still is a relatively obscure religion to most, so no worries.

It's wonderful that you are so active in trying to better the world we live in. I really wish we had more people who were more concerned with the environment. While, I'm not an environmentalist by profession, I do try to do my small part in helping the environment. I think, generally most Baha'is, are concerned with the environment and see the exploitation of our planetary natural resources as one of the symptoms of an overly materialistic society, that only considers short-term economic growth, and does not benefit all of humanity, and cannot concern itself with the long-term viability of life on earth.

Anwyas, thanks again for your great expansion of the article -- Jeff3000 18:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel. Regarding sustainable fisheries, there are few good examples in the world to point to and industrial fishing, with sein purse nets and long-lines are particularly damaging to the environment. The Australian government has been particularly concerned with the poaching of Patagonian tooth fish (see article at http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=11981) and also with the taking of sharks fins, trochus shells and beche la mer (Sea cucumbers) by Indonesian craft, operating for Chinese syndicates in the north.

See the attached UPI article

Australia detains 200 Indonesian fishermen

PERTH, Australia, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- Australia has detained more than 200 Indonesian fishermen caught poaching for shark fins for Chinese-owned companies, The Australian reported Thursday.

The fishermen are being held in a makeshift detention camp at the northwest port of Broome, the report said.

In the latest incident Tuesday, Australian Customs officers battled fishermen wielding knives and machetes, who set fire to their boat in an attempt to prevent the officers from boarding it. The officers found two holds full of shark fins and the carcasses of about 50 sharks.

The fishermen are paid around $45 a month by Chinese-owned fishing syndicates, and will likely have to pay for their lost boats on top of the fines they must pay Australia, a lawyer who is defending 15 fishermen told a Perth court Wednesday.

Legal Aid lawyer David McKenzie said each of his clients was their family's breadwinner, with up to seven children to support.

The men were fined between $1,500 and $5,000 by the court.

Australia initiated a crackdown on foreign fishing boats after news reports that they were coming closer to the northern coast, raising fears of disease as some crews were said to be setting up camp and bringing animals ashore.

To deal with these issues the Australian government have just tightened up the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) which means that the Australian Government can now play a stronger role in promoting ecologically sustainable management of fisheries and assessing their environmental performance. We have one of the few remaining sustainable fisheries on the planet.

This is partly due to the work in Australia of the very active Australian Marine Fisheries Conservation Society that play a very important role.

As for what is happening elsewhere I can remember reading that 17 of the 19 major world fisheries are collapsing through overfishing. Pretty grim.

Hope this helps

John D. Croft 16:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

According to policy, we should move userboxes that did not say about language capabilities to User: namespace. I'm happy to see, that this solution has been copied from German Wikipedia, because I found it faster than other English Wikipedia users, and created my userboxes in Polish Wikipedia in User: namespace. It is good to us to not using Template: namespace, because it should not be used for POV templates. Hołek ҉ 16:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel, Welcome to WikiProject Environment. --Alex 13:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info Joel, I hope you enjoyed your trip to Scotland. I have recently come back from a weekend up in Aberdeen, there's some beautiful scenery up there. --Alex 13:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:SD Quintet.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Ask me whenever you need help. This includes asking a (nearly) unlimited number of silly questions :). For a start, read Wikipedia:Footnotes (as CesarB replied to you on the Village pump). --Ligulem 16:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

What sort of information are you looking for? Basic research (5-10 years to fielding), piloting efforts (3-5 years to fielding), or full scale development renewable energy products? The field changes so fast right now that it's difficult to find one source of links. Are you interesting solar, biofuels, wind,...? Do you want information at a layman's level or engineer's? Assuming the former, here are some places to start, the first being narrative and general, and the second being a trove of places to look for more information; http://www.azsolarcenter.com/education/renewable011199.html http://www.uwsp.edu/CNR/wcee/keep/Renewable_Energy_Education/

Cheers! Skyemoor 21:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Home Power magazine is a good source for determining how to power your home with solar, wind, micro-hydro, etc.

I have created a barnstar for Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment. Please visit the talk page to vote for the barnstar since there are no votes for 2 months. OhanaUnited 20:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you think WikiProject Environment should start working on assessment scale? It would be better to do now than wait for backlog to accmuluate. OhanaUnited 07:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Joel! A few editors are getting together to create a task force with the goal of making sure environmental records of corporations and politicians are accurately and efficiently represented in relevant entries. Given your interests, I thought I'd bring your attention to this project. If you think it's a good idea, please consider chiming in on the discussion page. We hope to have a task force page up soon and of course would love to have you involved!Benzocane 23:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Joel, for your thoughts. We've made some progress getting the Task Force page up. We are more geared towards record keeping than the particulars of new technologies, but you might take a look all the same and see if it interests you. If you have any thoughts or advice at any point, of course it would be most welcome. Benzocane 20:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

TRUE Scary isn't it? Fifty years ago the world was consuming 4 billion barrels of oil per year and the average discovery was around 30 billion. Today we consume 30 billion barrels per year (84 million barrels of oil per day) and the discovery rate is now approaching 4 billion barrels of crude oil per year (11 million barrels of oil per day). 84/11 = 7.6 Kjell Aleklett The oil supply tsunami alert Energy Bulletin, April 25, 2005. The difference is being made up from draining known reserves (since production = consumption right now).

This is well oil - "crude". Unconventional oil is often in the form of tar sands and shale and to date still very difficult to extract. Consumption continues to go up because of developing nations and discovery of new oil is going down fast every year. Find some sources to disprove it.Kgrr 14:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello Joel. A rather belated reply on referencing. I cannot give any definitive answer to your questions. It is difficult to juggle layout for best appearance with how to accurately give sources of info. In the article in question I went for appearance over accurate placement of references. I think that as long as the references are there and accurately quoted and analysed the job is done. I suspect the majority of WP readers want the info itself rather than the refs so I edit pages for the readers who are not chasing refs. Apparently there will be a Wikimedia revision that allows blocks of text to be easily referenced. It looks like something that would be impossible to achieve in printed material. -- Alan Liefting talk 06:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel Russ. Sorry about that, I rarely check email so I didn't see your message (my talk page is the best place to contact me). I'll respond to your questions here. By all means, restore any parts of the article that can be sourced- it would be greatly appreciated. My goal was to clean up these articles which contained a great deal of unsourced information. Thanks for your work on these pages. -Classicfilms (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You wrote .... Hi. After quite a few years now as a contributor to, and user of, Wikipedia, I decided to plug in the name Jack Schwarz. I participated a seminar of several days with him, in Vancouver many years ago. Anyhow, I enjoyed and learned from your article about Jack. Did you know him? Joel Russ (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I met him only a few times with Bennet Wong and Jock McKeen. Ben and Jock had a warm relationship with him, and I was with them at conferences on a couple of occasions where I witnessed Jack's respect for them, and their enjoyment of him. He was an old-world European gentleman with a very open mind. I liked him a lot. William Meyer (talk) 17:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I came upon the name of a child called Bobby de Ropp as part of a study I was doing, and was intrigued when I found the Wiki article which had to be about the same person - which then referred only to his later writings on human potential. Further surprise when I discovered a completely different angle in his academic career and work which was not then included in the article. I was puzzled because he disappeared off the radar inexplicably between childhood and his academic career. Add to that the mysterious Baron de Ropp who seemed to be the most likely candidate to be his father. Had I sent off for Warriors Way instead of The Master Game, all would have been explained. However by digging around I have come up with some independent corroboration of his autobio. So I am most grateful to you for bringing WW to my attention and I now have a copy. And remain astounded by his fascinating life. Ironical that he nearly committed suicide in Australia by trying to drown in the harbour, and eventually did die by drowning. Regards Motmit (talk) 19:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new Visual arts/Technology-related project in Wikipedia:

WikiProject Industrial design is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to Industrial design (also called Product design).

• If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Industrial design in Wikipedia...
• At least, it's more than for Typography, and there IS a Typography WikiProject...
• And it's more than the Fashion WikiProject with 482 articles...
• There is also an Urban studies and planning project and a Video games portal so...
• Now you can also see a proposal for the Design Portal. (that portal would be for Industrial design AND Graphic design/Interior design)

Please support this initiative,
--  Alain  R 3 4 5 
^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 23:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Joel Russ. You have been invited to join WikiProject Industrial design, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Industrial design-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project or the Design Portal. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add to your userpage: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Userbox}} and to the top of your talk page: == WikiProject Industrial design (announcements) == {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial design/Announcements}} Know someone who might be interested? Please pass the message to others by pasting the code in their talk page: == WikiProject Industrial design and Design Portal == {{subst: Template:WikiProject_Industrial design/Welcome|~~~~}} Thanks, AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Zen, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Yworo (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Joel, got your email. I prefer communicating on-wiki unless privacy issues are involved. I sent you this message because marking an edit minor is only for things like spelling, grammar and formatting corrections. You added an entire paragraph with citations, from what I can tell. I haven't evaluated the content, but because some editors exclude minor edits from their watchlist, minor edits might not be seen by as many editors. For a true minor edit, this is not an issue. Marking major edits minor is sometimes used by editors who would like their edit to receive less scrutiny from other editors. I'm sure this is not the case for you, that you were just unaware how marking an edit minor was supposed to be used. So it's just a informational message about how and when to mark an edit minor. Yworo (talk) 22:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I know you're a big wheel on that page. But it's always suffered a little from underciting.
I have never gone through the log to identify who precisely hadn't done his citations fully.
Anyway, your latest add matches the existing citation on that paragraph, eh?
There's some good stuff in that article; I don't want to see a member of the can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees battalion blowing away half the article cuz it lacks a footnote.
Yours in mental health, Varlaam (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you're right, it is not clear so I've reworded it. What is meant is something like the maximum sustainable yield. If fisheries are run down by harvesting too many, you come to a point of diminishing returns where the amount you can continue to harvest at a steady rate has become much less than it need be. This is one definition of overfishing, and it turns out that many of the global fisheries have now been overfished. The solution is simple for the most part, curtail fishing for a while until the fisheries recover and then resume fishing. The current fishing fleet is a separate matter, and has a gross overcapacity. --Epipelagic (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldous Huxley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I thought the wording was strange for the lead paragraph. I'm new here, so my undo might have been a mistake. Feel free to undo it if you feel that my change did not improve it. Perhaps I should lurk more before editing. Optimom (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Watts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of opportunities for personal growth. Through Humphreys, he contacted eminent spiritual authors (e.g., [[Nicholas Roerich]] [an artist, scholar, and mystic], [[Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan|Dr.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I know "User Boxes" on editors' Talk pages are not high priority — that they're 'just for fun' (and some would say, more or less an indulgence). I like them because they're a way for an editor to tell interesting things about him/herself with quick verbal/visual messages. To me, they're valuable in that way.

I'd like to suggest a few new user boxes, but don't know who to suggest them to. I'm not terribly visually creative, so I'd like to pass my ideas on to someone who is, and who enjoys making user boxes.

My ideas are for ones about: 1) Food Gardener ; 2) Handyman (or Handyperson) ; Community Volunteer (with reference to the IRL community they live in). (If any of these exist, I have not located them).Joel Russ (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Try posting a message on the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ernest Callenbach may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Joel Russ/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Joel Russ/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Joel Russ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy to be informed & corrected on this.

My experience (11 or 12 years) has been with stub & article writing, content editing, and editing for wording & punctuation. A userbox is new for me, which is why I made it in the Sandbox.

I realize a userbox isn't an article. However, my impression (perhaps incorrect) was that potential userboxes had to be review & approved. If this is correct, then do not know why my submission was rejected — is it because I clicked the wrong button while in the Sandbox?

Please inform me. Thank you.Joel Russ (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

User boxes do not have to be submitted for review just copy and paste the code onto your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Baer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Baer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Szzuk (talk) 12:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lancelot Law Whyte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Henry FitzGerald Heard, a.k.a. Gerald Heard.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All three sources are identical. You should merge the duplicates.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garma Chen Chi Chang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Greenman, please consider the citation sources again. Yes, two references are from the same source, but there is also another source given.There are numerous citations on Wikipedia referencing Chang's published work. If you put "Garma C. C. Chang" into the Wikipedia search window, these citations come up. The draft (being intended as a stub) cites sources that I'd think would be reliable for a basic biography of the man; it's reasonable to believe there are people who could flesh the skeleton article out.Joel Russ (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Aldous Huxley, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Joel Russ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garma Chen Chi Chang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Joel Russ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Garma Chen Chi Chang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Richard Raymond (publisher). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, my plan has always been to insert the citations. Too busy with other things to do that today, and may again have a lot on my plate tomorrow. However, for what I wrote, I do have the references at hand and intend to get the citations in place soon. Please bear with me on that, if you would.Joel Russ (talk) 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply