Iph

On 15 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Haunted Manor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 04:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tiny niggle: Paragraph text begins, 1st sentence, with (presumably) bot voice: "If my owner does screw up and miscorrect something, please let him know ..." but then 2nd sentence is owner Cmdrjameson voice: "Alternatively, my bot is exclusion compliant, so you can get my bot to ignore your page if you like. I'd prefer that you let me know if my bot causes any problems though, as I'm keen to fix any bugs it may have."! Iph 18:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)iphReply

Ah, excellent point! I guess you can tell that I added the second sentence relatively recently and didn't take enough care to fit it in to the surrounding context. Cheers, CmdrObot 20:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much Iph, my User Page is a mess and I plan to change it with a more detailed version on my views and hopes for the future and would be pleased if you could have a qiuke look at it. My grammer, spelling and phisical cordanation is very bad im told this is mainly bacause I was diagnosed with Developmental Dyspraxia when I was young. Normaly I have to rely on the spell checker in Microsoft Word to get it right, but this as you can see it is not working, I use comas all the time as a way to try and break up my sentances which are very fradgile, ive recently discovered that my tallent it a “amazing” imagination , and im currently working on a Role Playing Game (RPG) with a small group of friends from college, using Dark Basic and 3DS MAX 8

Sorry about the spelling, and i will not be affended if you remove this from your talk page I just felt like talking --Climax-Void   ^{Chat or My Contributions}

Oh yes i noticed on your page User:Iph/Userboxes you want to "Reform the UN" may i ask in what way?

Wow you even added links to Wikipedia articles! Thanks. If there’s anything I can help you with let me know --Climax-Void   ^{Chat or My Contributions}

Ok, hope to talk again --Climax-Void   ^{Chat or My Contributions}

Hi. I noticed that in the edit summary of your creation of the Robert Marsham article you stated that you were creating a placeholder article. The article looks like anything but a placeholder to me. However, I just want to tell you that per Wikipedia policy on blank articles, placeholder articles are deleted on sight. As a matter of fact, there is no reason for them to even exist, as pages can be moved to new titles when two or more notable people have the same name. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 17:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

See my copyright subpage

  Hello Iph! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. J Duncan M Derrett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but I do not have any more information. That is why I created it as a stub. The man is obviously a writer and scholar worthy of note for the number of books written on serious subjects.I have not found any secondary or tertiary sources. Iph (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Gary O'Donoghue.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 22:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The fact that this appeared here within moments of me uploading the file shows a problem with the uploading page. That page says:

Note that the box says "If you own the copyright ..." and "finally If you are prepared to do this, and are logged in to your Wikipedia account, click here". Well, I had just made the JPEG image and expected that when I clicked "here" it would be taken care of. But I just got the "Upload file" page which has a browse button to select the image file locally and a blank box into which the page gave no clue that I could see what to put or how.

I had to find another page with an image, go to the wikicommons page for it and pretend to edit that, to find that I needed to use the \{\{information ...}} macro and all that stuff.

The page for uploading a file needs to have right there on it specific examples with the guidance on what to put in that box, if this reaction(above, this page) is going to appear so quickly. At the moment all it says is "Indicate what the picture is of, who took it, and when it was taken as accurately as possible. Include the name of the article it should be in." Iph (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have now found another article about a TV news person, Trevor Macdonald, that has a photo, and copied the photo's page. Presumably that is enough to stop the photo being deleted. Iph (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gary O'Donoghue.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, IPH. Just thought I'd drop by and say thanks for creating the Annie Jessy Curwen article. I've added a few odds and ends to it – I hope you don't feel my edits have spoilt it in any way. Having done a bit of background reading since spotting the new article this evening, I'm convinced she merits an article in Wikipedia, so thanks again for addressing this. Best wishes — Hebrides (talk) 21:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted you. Google searches cannot be used as sources, and of course the first edit was not a minor edit so should not have been marked as minor. Maybe discuss it at the talk page and try to get consensus? Dougweller (talk) 15:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

In too much of a rush, I've changed the lead. But my points above are still relevant. Dougweller (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tuppy Owens 1998 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vydra (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article H. W. Horwill has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Iph. I'm wikignoming my way through the list of opera-related articles needing cleanup, and found something that you added way back in 2007 -- a synopsis for Beatrice di Tenda (change here). One of your sources has been tagged up as follows:

• Davenport, Guy, Performance programme ^[where?] text based on English libretto.

Do you have any ideas/ memories about where/ when/ who the programme notes were for? Scarabocchio (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hundreds-and-thousands. Since you had some involvement with the Hundreds-and-thousands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Grander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Grander until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on John Grander requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Iph,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Anno Domini (band) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anno Domini (band) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Kb.au (talk) 23:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Iph, I have reverted your edit to Oranmore (disambiguation) because Oran Mor is an intentional link to a disambiguation page. According to WP:INTDABLINK, intentional links to DAB pages should always go through the '(disambiguation)' link, even if it is a redirect. Leschnei (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Beauty and the Beast: Ugly Face of Prejudice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current source is just the network's site. Zero hits on GNews. All results on ProQuest and Newspapers.com were TV guide listings. While GBooks did return one magazine article in Indonesian that may be reliable, it means little in the absence of other reliable secondary sources. This article has barely been touched since 2011, and given its obscurity I don't think it's a worthwhile candidate for redirection or merging

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beauty and the Beast: Ugly Face of Prejudice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty and the Beast: Ugly Face of Prejudice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 14:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply