Imzadi1979
Joined 10 October 2005
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Imzadi1979 in topic A simple idea.
Welcome to the talk page of
Imzadi1979
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.
Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.
"Imzadi1979 (public)" is an alternate account for use on public computers.
Imzadi1979
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.
Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.
Post a message to my talk page 
A simple idea.
editI think that the article of Interstate 57 should be split into three articles saying “Interstate 57 in Arkansas”, “Interstate 57 in Missouri”, and “Interstate 57 in Illinois”. At the very same time the original article of Interstate 57 should continue to exist but change it into describing the interstate in its entire length from Arkansas to Illinois. I also think that the article on Interstate 42 should be changed to “Interstate 42 (North Carolina)” and create an article saying “Interstate 42 (Oklahoma-Arkansas)”. Robbie Whalen (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I remember asking him about if we should split Interstate 24 into separate state-level articles, and he said that it would best be to leave it alone due to the article itself having enough detail. But I can see some agreement for splitting Interstate 57 into a state-level article because combining the segments makes it 508.92 miles (819.03 km), which I guess is long enough to warrant it one. Not sure, exactly. For the Interstate 42 articles, I would probably say we should wait until segments of the Oklahoma-Arkansas portion are complete. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- @NJRobbie, NoobThreePointOh: the current article is not long enough to be split. Until it is, it's good enough to leave things as they are. Remember, three states is not a guarantee of a split, just a practical minimum to even consider a split. Imzadi 1979 → 23:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)