User talk:Huaiwei/Archive N

It is really annoying to me that you feel to add your sarcasm to every comment regarding something. Telling me that "little tiny detail" would mean microbes and such is just simply to get on the editors nerves, and the irony really isn't needed. You simply try to find everything against a person and use it to your advantage. It really needs to stop, it's weak and it's something you really as an adult need to ease up on. I'm sure you do not go out in the world with that type of attitude, because it most surely will not get you far. Please, keep your negativity and sarcasm to yourself.--Golich17 23:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

And my point has been proved.--Golich17 23:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The problem has been solved so why not remove it.Sparrowman980 02:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just liked to know if you ever wanted to add one of those info boxes in there like in what is on Qantas. Also if you need assistance on Singapore airlines I would be glad to help.Sparrowman980 19:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to thank you once again for all the good advice you gave me when you welcomed me to Wikipedia. I'm up to 350 edits now and enjoying all the wonderful tricky stuff there is on here.

Thanks again for pointing me towards all those articles that are helpful to newbies like me. It was really interesting to find out all the clever stuff you can do with Template:Convert and Wikipedia:Citation templates and I hope I'm learning fast.

With your assumed permission, I've also today welcomed another newbie to Wikipedia that I think has a Singapore interest judging by the Miss Singapore Universe article she contributed towards. I hope you don't mind me using a modification of the template you put on my taLK page...

I've also contributed to the debate at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (text formatting) and I am watching with interest your "battles" at Singapore Airlines.

Thanks again for all your good advice and assistance both now and in the future! Alice.S 02:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

In an effort to keep the table in a more simple, efficient manner, I removed the class codes, registration numbers, and engine type because they are all listed in Singapore Airlines fleet. Removing these would keep the basic, straight-forward information available, while not making the table intrusive as to size. I did not revert your reverts of my edits, so don't worry, no need to run there and revert anything.--Golich17 22:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:Singapore_Airlines#Article_Layout for my response.--Huaiwei 01:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Singapore Airlines awards and accolades, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Oo7565 06:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've removed this template as I believe it was placed out of process - it is NOT to be used for articles that have already survived an AfD and, in any case, the "sources" for this article include the publications and institutions typically listed in the first column of the table. (I'm beginning to think that there is a bit of an "anti-Singapore Brigade" in action... Alice.S 08:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alice.S (talk • contribs)

pLease can you try to expand Bukit Chandu a little thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

A few comments:

• Have you noticed that the contents of the Tiger Airways Australia destinations page are basically a duplication of the information in the "Route Announcements" subsection at Tiger Airways Australia#History? I'm not sure what purpose this duplication serves.
• Neither that table nor this page address fares particularly well.
• ALL of these destinations are flights from/to Melbourne ONLY. e.g. Although both Alice Springs and Darwin are destinations, you can't fly from Alice Springs to Darwin (without going via Melbourne).

Pdfpdf 10:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi I do agree that that huge table looks really out of place. I arent sure who changed it into a table, but I think the information was pre-existing. Will need an overhaul or something. I am considering creating a much smaller table somewhat similar to this, but highlighting the price wars as a result of each announcement. Will work on that later, but meanwhile, I think it might be prudent to clean that table up.--Huaiwei 10:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mea culpa!! (I created the table.) But I agree with you: "that huge table looks really out of place". What was there previously was very hard to read/analyse; the table is easier to read/analyse, but as you say, looks out of place. If you can improve it, Please do - you have my blessing.

But that wasn't my point. My point was the duplication of information in what was two sections, and is now two pages. I think the answer is ONE table which shows ALL of the information, (i.e. the routes, the fares, the announcement dates, the service commencement dates, etc.), but I don't want to stomp on anyone's toes. Pdfpdf 11:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I noticed that your last block was a couple of months ago. Therefore, I would like to know whether you would be interested in becoming an admin. We sure need more Singaporean admins for this project! I am aware that this potential nomination might be a failure but would you be keen to give it a try anyway? --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please reply your message to my talk page. Thanks! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Before you go any father do you mine getting a consensus for the rest of the work. What you have now is fine but please at least show me if you want to just continue. thanks.Sparrowman980 04:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kindly bring this discussion to the article talkpage. I do not see a need to actually get your permission before contributing anything in wikipedia.--Huaiwei 05:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe your missing the point i am not asking for permission i am asking to view it before you do MAJOR changes to a page what you have done so far is fine no complaints. Sparrowman980 06:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

First and foremost, kindly define a "major change", because what you consider major may hardly be so to others. I personally do not consider my change as major. Second, your demands to see my changes before I can submit them points to no better motive than your desire to "approve" any "major change". This is a classic case of asserting article ownership, and I will not entertain any such requests.--Huaiwei 09:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've taken the FARC nominator's concerns to his user talkpage. You may wish to work on it to address the issues along with other editors. - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 13:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've nominated 2010 Youth Olympics bids, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created.2Fexpanded on November 19, where you can improve it if you see fit. - Hamstersanonymous (talk) 03:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"obviously" heh. I just happened to spot it in the list of good articles proposed by bot on the DYK nom page and couldn't pass it up ;b - Hamstersanonymous (talk) 08:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 23 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2010 Youth Olympics bids, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--WjBscribe 17:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now that the DYK made it to the front page, time to work on the Singapore bid details? I don't think the bid books are openly available though, got to work from what the media reports are saying. Got a draft going here that I'll try to flesh out over the next week. Feel free to chip in! - Hamstersanonymous (talk) 11:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Before working a bit on the ERP article (to include some references, the planning and evolution of the system, some specific numeric results, etc.), I decided to improve first the Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, adding some more info and references. Since you have been so interested in the ERP article, I would like you to take a look at ALS, and edit any mistake I might inadvertently made, since I never visited Singapore, though I am very familiarized with demand management in your country (as I told you, it is the textbook case for urban transportation professionals). Also, that edit is an example of the what I am planning to do for the ERP article, and much of the reference are the same (actually, there are some more). Please if you find anything controversial, let me know on my user page and let's talk it over on the ALS Talk page. Thanks.Mariordo (talk) 07:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Moscow 2010 Bid Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Singapore 2010 Bid Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Huaiwei/Archive N, you have been invited to attend the SGpedians' meetup on 29 December 2007. We are planning to make this a full day event, but you may join/leave at anytime you wish. If you can or cannot make it, please leave your name here. It will be good to have you at the meetup. Terence (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

There has been a changes in Badminton at the 2007 Southeast Asian Games. About the medal table, I have changed it to Medal tally n erase the country.

So I hope u can accept it. Thank Q . Robert Siow (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have nothing to do with your content dispute on the SEA article, however could you please not revert my edit again, as it removes my grammar correction. Perhaps it would be better that you edit the article, rather than just reverting it. I assume you didn't notice my edit, so I have no hard feelings about this. thanks Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

This gentlman spent most of his invaluable time in arguing with someone about "target". Certainly he has no time to edit, not to mention improve the article in general. That is why he would like to revert instead of edit. Hopefully you can understand his current plight. Coloane (talk) 03:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yawn.--Huaiwei (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Although Singapore does not use Traditional Chinese, I still think we should at least add Traditional Chinese titles for shows not made by Mediacorp, and bought from overseas (mainly Hong Kong) TV stations. What do you think? Arbiteroftruth (talk) 06:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was searching on the wiki pages about public transport in singapore to find a clue on the public bike sharing which was operated between roughly 1999 to 2001/2 by clear channel. http://www.clearchannel.fr/veloalacarte/ click etranger for singapore Would like to know why this public bike( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_bicycle_program) sharing was discontinued.

thanks for answering to my user page. Stefanbcn (talk) 21:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Singapore Changi Airport. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Michael Billington (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

He's back. Just vandalized my userpage, and vows to massively vandalize Wikipedia pages on Mediacorp topics. What should I do? I need help! Arbiteroftruth (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I challenge you to live up to your claims and continue to show how proud you are to bully your fellow editors. I challenge you, I dare you, to remove the LEAD, the Table of Contents and the infobox from the article. Do it and do it now. Show what kind of a strong man you are. Do it.--Filll (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am calling your bluff, tough guy. Do it. Show how much you WP:OWN the article.--Filll (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that this is appropriate language for discussing edits. Edits should be discussed in terms of whether they will improve our encyclopedia and its helpfulness to our readers. You make some valuable points, Filll, so please try not to personalise them too much. Alice^✉ 19:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just diasmbiguated the two pages, here and here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've left the following comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports:

"I realise that American English is the lingua franca of the airline world, but why was it thought necessary by this project to disregard the advice given at Wikipedia:DATE#Autoformatting and linking with regard to wikilinking dates, please?

This may slightly irritate some of our logged on readers that have different date preferences set, but, more importantly, leads to constant tinkering by editors that may be familiar with our Manual of Style in general but not this project's edict in particular.

I think you guys should at least add your local exception to the page I reference above!"

Happy New Year! (in advance - grin) Alice^✉ 20:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been invited to join WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Hello Huaiwei. Judging from your constant appearance in posts on Skyscrapercity.com, you are hereby invited to join WikiProject Skyscrapers! Have a good day wiki-ing!

Angcr (talk) 11:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. Please feel free to contact any project member if you have any questions. Thanks for joining!

-- Rai-me 22:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're very welcome! And great work on the Singapore skyscraper articles. Cheers, Rai-me 20:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Bangkok 2010 Bid Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Moscow 2010 Bid Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I jumped the gun on Kaiqi's dialect name, but they have established Kaijie's dialect name in the first minutes of Episode 20. They showed his police name tag in one shot, and it reads Ng Kay Kiat.

Link to the video [1] Arbiteroftruth (talk) 15:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think you might enjoy bringing this to his notice more than I would: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singapore_Airlines_awards_and_accolades&diff=184844831&oldid=184781455 Alice^✉ 23:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Huaiwei, there is this guy HkCaGu who insist that we shouldnt put Tianjin as one of Xiamen Airline's destination from Singapore just because it passes by Xiamen(MF's HUB) however, this is a direct flight from singapore to tianjin via xiamen. what are your views?Sghan (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

As long as we are backed up by referencing, it will be in. Was there any changes in routing without our knowledge?--Huaiwei (talk) 06:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I read in the papers(Lian He Zao Bao)(see what I edited in the changi airport page before that HkCagu reverted it back) that Xiamen airlines will be inaugurating a new route to Tianjin,China via Xiamen.Sghan (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You may want to review the entire situation before making remarks like that; remarks that one could perceive as snarky and / or undermining. I (and others) have offered to help the user at User talk:Maglev Power, as well as discussions on IRC. - Rjd0060 (talk) 07:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi, i've noticed you've added a {{#if:{{{2|}}}||  into the template. Just wanted to know the intention for it, and if any page uses that. (just in case i accidentally break the code i can fix it :) ) - oahiyeel ^talk 03:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of world's busiest ports by shipping tonnage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the comment was directed at you. It only just happenned that I edited the article after you. You may have noticed I have started an RfC which is a waste of time. But for the sake of bureaucracy we'll leave it for two weeks. After that I'll move on to the next stage. I suspect there will be deadlock and we'll be left with what we have now unless there is actual arbitration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RomanceOfTravel (talk • contribs) 23:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated Masjid Hajjah Fatimah, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masjid Hajjah Fatimah and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The fucking deleted the page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by RomanceOfTravel (talk • contribs) 17:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Huaiwei. I have noted some changes made by you to the list of tallest buildings in Singapore. This includes the adding of a picture column, and the shifting of some images. I would agree that is indeed a noble effort. And if you look at featured lists on tallest buildings, such as San Francisco and Dubai, you would notice that the pictures are not part of the table, but individually standing on the right.

I would suggest that the 'Picture' column be scraped off. Instead, we could use the conventional way to placing pictures as thumbs on the right. Thank you. Angcr (talk) 09:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Angcr that the page should look like other such pages, but I think that the current look is better because it shows more buildings. I know the format is wrong, but you can see more images this way and they are lined up with the names, which saves redundant descriptions next to the pictures. I think this format is better. Still, I made the images bigger so that they could actually be seen and differentiated.DaronDierkes (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey there my old arch-nemesis, haha, just a quick note in regards to List of airlines of the People's Republic of China. I, as well as yourself, no doubt, don't want to get into an edit war or the like on this article, so what I am proposing is that the article be left in the form in which I wrote it, and we can discuss it at WP:AIRLINES, so that we can involve the entire project. This way we can have everyone reading off the same page. If an agreement can't be reached on the project page, then we can look at other avenues, but I sincerely hope that we can reach an agreement and concensus as a group. Can we both agree to that? Cheers mate --Russavia (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bugger, I forgot to mention that I will start the section on the airline project page, and have already started writing up info on what my viewpoint is as well as what your viewpoint is (feel free to correct me if I misinterpret what I will write there of course), so please just wait until my 'thread' appears, it shouldn't be too long ok. Cheers --Russavia (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply. Can I ask is if it is also your personal opinion that Hong Kong and Macau are too be included in these lists, or is this a position you take due it being the way that Chinese articles seem to be done? Would be good to know, so that I can think about a few things. :) Cheers --Russavia (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah, the other thing I forgot to ask for, in this edit, you mention Chinese conventions. I have looked for them, but can't be sure if I have found the right ones. Could you possibly point me in the right direction and shoot me over a link to them. Cheers --Russavia (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:SchmuckyTheCat/Nood

The flag is rep. the airport itself, not country. It is not necessary to politise everything in wiki. Pls pay attention to the title of the column, it printed as "airport". Coloane (talk) 13:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

My point is: if you change the title of airport to country on that table, then you did the right job. It means I don't object you change to PRC flag. Coloane (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Take a look over the title of that table, it printed as "airport", not country. Coloane (talk) 13:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

So both of us already broke 3RR. Do you want to esclate it? Coloane (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reason already explained very clearly. The title of that table from that specific col. is AIRPORT, not COUNTRY. Coloane (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You don't know what imprudence is. Your malicious and evil motivation simply reflect your national education didn't give you what the basic idea of good faith is. Coloane (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on World's busiest airports by passenger traffic. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- Revolving Bugbear 14:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply