Kangaru99

Hi Nick. Here's the link explaining notability for events in date articles: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year Rklawton 17:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You wrote me a nice note about the euthanasia article. I've been on a somewhat inadvertent wikibreak, unrelated to this article. Not sure when I can get back to it. Sorry. Take care, HG | Talk 05:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kangaru. The first sentence currently in the article is the size of a paragraph, but is one single sentence. I personally, believe that your sentence that you have provided is better than the current one. It is shorter, and the current sentence gives too much description of the term in the one opening sentence, and this description should be spread out equally in the opening paragraphs, and not in the one sentence. However, there is a separate article for animal euthanasia, so "terminating the life of a terminally ill person or animal" should become "terminating the life of a terminally ill person". You may wish to also shorten up the Greek etymology, and put it within a footnote, which can be placed at the bottom of the article along with references (see the Notes section on Charles Darwin, which has several of these inline notes).

Kind regards, Sebi _[talk] 10:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Forgot something. The sentence "terminating the life of a terminally ill person" seems a bit... extraneous. Could we reword that sentence slightly? Sebi _[talk] 10:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability does not apply to content. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 16:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

From the history of the article on Zachary Taylor, you appear to be a notable contributor to it. As a result, I thought you might like to get involved in a discussion I have started on the talk page concerning a proposal to change the main picture in the infobox: [1] If you do get involved, thank you. Terrakyte (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re your message: I had forgotten about that issue. I think you are correct that a consensus has not been achieved nor likely to with the editors involved. The issue could use some additional editors involved in the discussion to reach a consensus. You might try bringing up the issue again on the Neutral Point of View Noticeboard, though the original alert by Kollision is still there, or request a third opinion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re your message: Yes, the discussion is indeed getting rather heated. There appears to be some undisclosed off-wiki history between the involved editors, though what that exactly is, I have no idea. Reverting and protecting the article to some previous state is not going to happen as that is not quite how the article should evolve. I still think that getting additional, uninvolved editors into the discussion would help matters. Right now, things are entirely between two editors and that just causes a deadlock. The WP:POVN notice doesn't seem to be attracting any attention, but perhaps a posting to one of the WikiProjects related to the article might draw some interest. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey can we work more on expanding the Zachary Taylor suicide issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.196.15.73 (talk) 23:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Work Ganicall 18:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganicall (talk • contribs)