Konroh

Thank you for getting a login account and contributing to Noah. Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not treat creationist sources as reliable. That's a basic practice here, and you'll find it to be true across all of Wikipedia's pages that intersect with the topic. The basic policies in dealing with what is and is not a reliable source can be found at WP:RS and WP:FRINGE, and you'll find that the majority of editors just about on any corner of Wikipedia will treat creationist material as falling outside of reliable sources. Alephb (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

So what sources would be considered reliable for a topic of harmonizing biblical accounts? It seems like evidence that seeks to harmonize biblical source material showing that a singular author is possible is simply discounted. But why can't evidence be presented? Konroh (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply