Samuel Wiki

Their will be a alpha and omega 2 and many websites including wiki help said their will be one. Even entertainment weekly said their will be one. Look at talk in the article of alpha and omega. It said there will be a possible sequel. And simple English Wikipedia said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

One of Wikipedia's core policies is Verifiability. This means that whenever something contentious or possibly contentious is added to Wikipedia, a reliable source must be provided. Some examples of reliable sources include books, newspapers, magazines and websites written by people of some authority (eg. professional journalists). This policy ensures that the information on Wikipedia is accurate. Wikipedia does not deal in rumors. The Wikipedia Talk page and the Simple English Wikipedia do not count as reliable sources that can be used to source information on Wikipedia (you cannot use Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia). The Entertainment Weekly article would be considered a reliable source, except that it is no longer available. My guess is that it proved to be untrue and was taken down, if it even existed. If it was true, the news would have been rereported by other publications. I have not been able to find a single reliable source that says an Alpha and Omega sequel is in development or production. If it was in development or production, the studio would have announced it and there would definitely be multiple sources reporting about it. Face it, an Alpha and Omega sequel is not in production. It is only until a reliable source that says otherwise is found that the information can be added to the article. - Kollision (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

This time of year, that page is one of the top searched items on google. Having that page as a title (academy awards nominations) raises the wikipedia rank on the google search, it also provides the information that most readers are looking for. They want to see what the nominations are, and if they so chose they can click on the main article for more information. There is currently no page that offers readers a simple and accurate list of nominations without adds or lots of other information the user is not interested in reading. By having a page like this, readers have the info they want, links to articles on the movies, directors, this years academy awards and the history of the awards all in once place. I have watched the search rank of this page go higher and higher per day and I checked the stats and the amount of people accessing this page began at a rank of 500 hits a day and grew, which for me at least, shows that many readers, as I've said, would like to have a simple and accurate page with nominations and links to other articles if they so chose to click on them. I hope I've made sense here. --Shabidoo | Talk 00:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

There was also some (admittedly small) amount of extra information in the introduction and in the infobox. --Shabidoo | Talk 00:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013 now redirects to 85th Academy Awards, which contains all the nominations. Having two articles with the same information was pointless and we usually don't branch off into smaller articles unless the main article gets too long, which is not the case here. The article title has no bearing on this, people will not have any problems finding this list. All that Google stuff has no bearing on this either; we do not change the way we do things just because it may result in a higher rank on Google. If someone clicks the link to '85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013' on Google they will be redirected to '85th Academy Awards'. In time, the link to '85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013' will probably be removed from Google and the rank for '85th Academy Awards' will also go up. - Kollision (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes...when you put it that way, that does make sense. --Shabidoo | Talk 07:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the discussion about coordinators at WT:FILM, I set up a long time ago the agenda you linked to. These were my own ideas, and they may have been proposed in too much of a top-down fashion. Discussions at WT:FILMC were never very fulfilling, so I've grown cynical about the notion of collaboration, both formal and informal. Thankfully we have a healthy general talk page that can resolve disputes and build consensus on a case-by-case basis. It may be that WikiProject Film has too much structure (especially with the unused task forces) and we need to get back to basics, such as empowering editors with their own tools. (My recent "Recommended pages" posting is one attempt at that.) In the past, I talked to Peppage (talk · contribs) about having a bot that could address the more tedious editing tasks, but that never got finalized. If you have suggestions about what to do with WikiProject Film and whether or not it involves coordinators, I'm happy to hear you out. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you type in alpha and omega in google look at the right and it says in there"sequel: Alpha And Omega 2" but it's unchangeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

That is still not a reliable source. The Knowledge Graph pulls information from a variety of sources including Wikipedia itself. It is actually quite likely that Google's "Alpha and Omega 2" information was retrieved from when the information was still in the Alpha and Omega Wikipedia article and it has taken some time for the update to flow through. - Kollision (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it got the sequel info from Wikipedia and also look at alpha and omega's Facebook page and it says would you like to see an alpha and omega 2 and over 1500 people said yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

That doesn't mean anything; "Would you like to see an Alpha and Omega 2?" is not the same as "Alpha and Omega 2 is in development." Like I said before, until a reliable source confirms Alpha and Omega 2 is in development, it isn't happening. - Kollision (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Surprise. I saw a shooting star and said to have alpha and omega 2 be a movie And now there is a alpha and omega series and the first of the series is alpha and omega 2: A howl-iday adventure. Shooting stars do make wishes real.Rodj123 (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Kollision; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

They had a 3 movie contract and they only did 1 then the upcoming on would be norm of the north but what's the 3rd? Would it be alpha and omega 2? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The third film has not yet been announced. Whether it will be or won't be Alpha and Omega 2 is a matter of speculation. Wikipedia deals with verifiable facts, not rumors or speculation. - Kollision (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have made an article about an actress called Mia Frye she appeared in the Nikita film that you have edited. If you know french and can update her article please do. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bruce Weber (photographer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Saw that you made the last modification to the template, might you be able to add support for album ?

For example

• https://vimeo.com/album/2805910 Fuzz testing

WurmWoode^T 22:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hypermetabolism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• signals an underlying issue, it is one of the body’s strongest defenses against illness and injury].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm looking to help re-activate the Percy Jackson Task-force. As you are one of the few "inactive" or "unknown" members still actively editing Wikipedia, I wanted to extend an invitation for you to work with me to do this. If you are no longer interested, I'd appreciate your taking the time to move your username to the "inactive" list here or removing it altogether. And thanks for all you did before!

If you are interested, firstly I'd like to invite you to become a full member, as the requirements for membership are going to be lowered in the near future (I know they scared me away on the first try) -- or just a "supporter", if that's more your speed. I would also ask you to consider a proposal I have, which is that this task-force become the "Rick Riordan" task-force. I've suggested this because I think it would help keep the project active and also help stop some pretty widespread vandalism in articles referring to that author. My proposal in brief. I'm a relatively new Wikipedian, so I'd appreciate the advice and expertise of a more experienced user. Thanks again in advance, and feel free to contact me on my Talk page. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Kollision, just checking up on your July invitation to rejoin the Percy Jackson Task-force. Please do not feel pressured in any way to decide, but be aware that your username has been moved to the "Inactive" section of our members list, should you ever go looking for it. Thanks again for your past work, and happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Federation Centres logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jarrad Seng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2015 Nepal earthquake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

On 21 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jarrad Seng, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that photographer Jarrad Seng (pictured) pranked music festivalgoers by disguising himself as American DJ Steve Aoki? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jarrad Seng. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Walking on a Dream cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Samuel Wiki. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one bot account that appears to be inactive. Please see the discussion and list of bots here: Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard#Inactive bots over 5 years. If you are no longer operating your bot, no action is required - your bot will be marked as retired and have the bot flag removed. Should your bot be retired and you wish to revive it in the future, please request bot authorization at WP:BRFA. If you are still in control of your bot (including knowing its hopefully strong password) and wish to maintain the bot flag, please sign the table on the linked discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Started a discussion Talk:Ibuprofen_brand_names#Split Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philosophy of Ghost in the Shell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy of Ghost in the Shell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 20:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

 

Hello, Samuel Wiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Samuel Wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19988 was submitted on Dec 08, 2017 03:00:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

You appear to be a Perth, western australia resident - are you interested at all in meeting up with fellow editors/photographers?

If so please note -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/45

No harm if you are not interested, but just alerting you to the option of meeting real live editors... JarrahTree 05:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Samuel Wiki. I see that you recently created a redirect to Goongoongup Bridge. These structures were built about 5 years apart and although adjacent, are quite separate things. I'd prefer that this remain as a redlink which may encourage someone to actually develop an article. A redirect won't do that. Moondyne (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Done Moondyne (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am aware they are separate structures but I felt it was better for the reader to be redirected to some information than to get no information. Anyway, I created the article for Windan Bridge now. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, looks great. Moondyne (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A move request regarding Deadline.com / Deadline Hollywood, an article you have edited, is taking place at Talk:Deadline Hollywood#Requested move 11 March 2018. It is scheduled to end in seven days.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

to not wish to identify your location - but notice that you edit items -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/50

just in case you are interested JarrahTree 12:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

If you were local and interested in any way meeting with local editors at all ? JarrahTree 05:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am local. I did meet you guys once way back in 2011. But I'm happy carrying on doing my own thing at the moment. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's fine - if or whenever you are interested - it's mainly a quite different mob and context now as well JarrahTree 22:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

for your contributions to west oz material - and have a good new year as well maybe we'll get you out of your here/not here mode and actually to a wikipedia meetup in the new year some time :) (things change in 7 years) JarrahTree 01:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

better images maybe - it all depends, replacing images in articles could be a matter of perspective - would be better (sic) if you could be a little more neutral when you replace images, at least in the edit summaries - more representative of the subject of the article - some images can be crap, and even fail quality wise, but actually involve better the context or the sense of the subject... always better to let others judge that... just a thought... JarrahTree 11:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks for adding, improving, and organising photos (here as well as on Commons and Wikidata). The articles I checked certainly looked much better after your edits. Cheers, - Evad37 [talk] 08:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you're interested in finding out whats missing images on Wikidata, WikiShootMe (documentation) is quite good for that. - Evad37 [talk] 08:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi. A topic about internet censorship in iran needs to become update on Wikipedia. Please add "How Iranian people access to block websites and use social medias" Wikipedia needs your attention to become better place. Thank you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran Omid6578 (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

make sure to avoid the multanovas, and despite your diffidence - hope we see you sometime in 2020! thanks for your contributions to the west australian items JarrahTree 08:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:HBF Health Fund (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

 

The article World of Ghost in the Shell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary plot split that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. While there is analysis on the series' themes, it's not really relevant to the fictional world as its own topic. That's better left to an analysis section in the main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have been helping with an effort to clear up false-positives in Special:WantedTemplates and found that 10 of the entries can be traced back to User:Samuel Wiki/monobook.js/script.js. For example, if you check Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Start date\ , you will see that the server is reporting that User:Samuel Wiki/monobook.js/script.js is transcluding that template. Clearly this is a quirk in how the backend software parses javascript pages, but it makes it harder to find the real problem pages. It would be great if you could put

// <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript>

at the top of the script page and

// </syntaxhighlight>

at the bottom of the script page. Since these are commented out, it won't break the javascript, but it will prevent the backend software from parsing the {{Start date\| as a template transclusion. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

There have been a few changes with Skillsoft, so some of the information needs to be updated: they are now a public company, they've merged with Global Knowledge, and their leadership team has gone through some changes also.

Skillsoft Public Relations (talk) 13:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for splitting out OTR (convenience store) from On the Run (convenience store), I have been thinking of doing that the past week but was putting it off, so glad to see someone like you have done it first. I will also add in a photo that I took last week that was intended for the stand-alone OTR article. Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

All good! Samuel Wiki (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Lego films and TV series, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tattarang logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"NOTICE OF RESOLUTION BROWNES DAIRY PTY LTD (IN VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)". Commonwealth Of Australia Gazette. Business. No. B28. Australia, Australia. 14 July 1998. p. 1908. Retrieved 29 February 2024 – via National Library of Australia. - not sure where that fits (or not) JarrahTree 09:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JarrahTree I haven't read anything about a liquidation or anything around that time. I would leave it out until you get a clearer picture of what happened. -Samuel Wiki (talk) 10:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

thanks for answering, I find the item weird, and not touching it. JarrahTree 10:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Gorillaz - Clint Eastwood (sample).ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an improvement to understanding Clint Eastwood (song) or Gorillaz. Not proven that omitting the file would detriment such understanding either. In other words, not contextually significant to either topic in question.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply