Foghe

 

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Foghe. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Foghe, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Democratic Republic of the Congo. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 01:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitution of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government of Change, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm SSSB. I noticed that you recently removed content from French Grand Prix without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SSSB (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Germany–Italy football rivalry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1970 World Cup and 1954 World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 14:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Unite the Right rally, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Foghe, and thanks for your contributions to the encyclopedia! I noticed that you have created a lot of articles on United Nations Security Council resolutions that only have around one line of text that says "United Nations Security Council resolution XXXX was adopted in XXXX". An article that size doesn't really have enough information for a stand-alone article and might not even meet our general notability guideline. Because the articles are so short, I'd like to propose redirecting or merging them into List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2401 to 2500 or List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2501 to 2600. If there are ones that you are able and willing to expand into fuller articles, that would be acceptable as well, but as it stands I fail to see how an individual article is beneficial. Let me know what you think, I'm open to discussion. Best wishes and happy editing! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Eddie891: Hi, when I was surfing Wiikipedia I read articles of old resolutions, carrying limited amount of data, but provinding nevertheless vital information such as the members of the Coucil, the number of the meating, pictures related to the topic, and valuable references—figures not reported elsewhere. The page also gives possibility to expand it gradually and concurrently with other users in the meanwhile (e.g. like resolution 2065). A redirect would not in my opinion provide even half of the information delivered at the moment, lacking the structure of an article, and his templates and links. Bye! --Foghe (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please update Positions by round. First round need updates. Thanks.

I responded here. --Foghe (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why are you changing image sizes in aircraft infoboxes to a hard coded 260px?Nigel Ish (talk) 10:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, because it was too large, especially if compared to all the other templates. --Foghe (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:115senate.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:115senate.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC) P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Foghe! I'm messaging you because I saw that you have an interest in font sizes at the 117th United States Congress page and would like to notify you that an RfC has been started on that very subject. Your input would be very much appreciated and the RfC can be accessed in the title of this section.

Sdrqaz (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 117th United States Congress into 118th United States Congress. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Diannaa: Hi, I'm glad for your message, but I merely copied verbatim from Draft:118th United States Congress—here I thought there was no need of attribution! Bye! --Foghe (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I reverted your edit carried out on date 17 January 2021 at 13:31 beacuse I think is better keep the letters in grey coulumns in bold Dr Salvus (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SakvusDr Salvus (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Do you remember where you find the data about the attendance in the wikitable on June 2020? Dr Salvus (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dr Salvus: Hi, I took it directly from the wikipage of each final. --Foghe (talk) 21:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Could you help me to improve this page? Dr Salvus 13:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dr Salvus: I'd be glad, unfortunately I am very busy this period. I'll try when I can. Bye! --Foghe (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2026 United States elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 27#2026 United States elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 20:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Home Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Scott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I just edited User:Foghe/U, fixing a div-span-flip lint error and a missing end tag lint error. I left 4 lint errors unfixed: 3 missing end tags and a stripped tag. The problem is in the inside {{Infobox peninsulas}}, the markup

|country = {{Infobox|child=yes
|rowclass1 = mergedrow
|label1 = Status
|data1 = {{longitem|Divided among eight sovereign states}}
}}

The four lint errors go away if you change that markup to either of these:

|footnotes = {{Infobox|child=yes
|label1 = Status
|data1 = {{longitem|Divided among eight sovereign states}}
}}

or

|footnotes = <div style="text-align:center">'''Administration'''</div><p>'''Status'''  Divided among eight sovereign states</p>

They both display a bit different from your version. I don't know if there is a way to do what you are trying to do without lint errors. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll try which fits the best! Bye. Foghe (talk) 10:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Please be aware of MOS:OVERLINK which says to not link "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar", for example countries like "Italy", nationalities like "Italian" and cities like "Rome" etc. I've removed the links at Gian Piero Galeazzi. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:ACMILAN. Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Consensus can be seen in this discussion. Please avoid being disruptive; if you disagree with the current consensus, open a new discussion at WT:FOOTY. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 18:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Can you add Serie A managers and kits and also stadiums for the Serie A seasons from 1981-82 to 1989-90. 80.212.168.110 (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Foghe. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Coppa Italia finals – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 17. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, @Foghe! I have a question for you. I saw on the UEFA coefficient article that you updated the abbreviations for the UEFA Europa League from "UEL" to "EUL" and for the UEFA Conference League from "UECL" to "COL". Can you please let me know where the updated abbreviations come from? Thank you very much. Coining (talk) 12:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply