Dianakc

Hi, Dianakc! I noticed that you requested an article on Extractivism under Minerals. I think this request would be more appropriate under requested articles on Economic Policies. Articles requested in the Natural Sciences section should primarily be about science. Have fun editing! Gorthian (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dianakc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Niacin (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having members who are notable indicates importance/significance. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

And for the same reason, I have declined your speedy of the album Deep (Niacin album). decltype (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dianakc, I have just noted you have (with a minimal common sense) declined the speedy delete tag from the article Deep (Niacin album). But anyway I want to note you should be more carefull to tag this kind of articles. This is obviously a relevant album from an important jazz band leaded by one of the most important bass players in the World, winner 5 times of the "Guitar Player Magazine" award as best bass player in the world. If that were not enought the album has entries and is reviewed in such important music sites as AllMusic, Discogs and Rolling Stone Magazine. This may be verified by anyone with a one minute google search, so as a frequent contributor I'm affraid of letting my collaboration work in the hands of people with such a "trigger-happy" criteria like you. Best Regards — Luis Vazquez — Preceding undated comment added 14:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dianakc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sanhuangjing, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to books. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Similarly for Tennessee State Route 354 and Rustaveli–Vazisubani Line. It only applies to the categories of items stated, not roads or ail lines. Nor does it apply to network TV shows, . For FKA twigs the BBC nomination is an indication of possible importance, And all villages and towns are considered notable in WP. As reviewing administrator, I must ask you to please check WP:CSD and WP:Deletion policy before you make additional speedy deletion recommendations. DGG ( talk ) 19:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Looking at your recent editing history, you need to familiarize yourself further with WP before you review articles. Try expanding incoplete articles, adding references, and writing articles yourself; only then will you be able to properly review the work of others. DGG ( talk ) 19:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dianakc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Swingz (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete this article, which you had nominated for speedy. There are obvious indications of historical importance, and I do not see anything resembling promotionalism. It is possible that you may have nominated this in response to its editor having nominated one of your pages for deletion. Doing that is never a good idea.

With respect to that other article Scandinavia and the World ‎, I changed the deletion tag to Prod, to give you some time to add references. Do not remove the tag unless you do add references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. If you do remove the tag without improvement, it will undoubtedly be sent for a deletion discussion. DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The artists to these albums do have a page here. Just look up "Slave Raider" and it will be there. There is very little information on this album so I cannot be very descriptive.

I removed the template {{expert}} as you did not add the reason parameter. Otherwise how would one know what part of the article needs expert attention? Please feel free to replace the template with the |talk= or |reason= parameter/field filled in. If it is a detailed reason, it would be best to add it to talk:Radical feminism and "|talk= section heading" added. The section heading parameter is case sensitive. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply