Destron Commander

Hi. Since Category:G.I. Joe characters is already a subcategory of Category:G.I. Joe, there's no need to include articles in both categories. The practice here is to include articles that belong in the subcategory only in the subcategory, otherwise it's redundant. Cheers!  BD2412 ^talk 23:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi Destron

Could you please edit your Joe Template to include the new page I created on G.I. Joe: America's movable fighting man, covering the 1964-69 releases.

Hholland 14:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!!

Hholland 15:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I've noticed you've uploaded some images tagged with {{web-screenshot}}. This tag is not meant to be used for images that came from Web pages; it's meant to be used for images of Web pages (such as Image:Google screenshot.png, for example). I've retagged the images below as having no license information. Please make sure that Wikipedia has permission to use these images. Then edit the image description pages to include information about the licenses these images are under. You may find an appropriate tag at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags or Wikipedia:Template messages, or if none of these fit you may write a description of the license yourself. You may want to refer to the image use policy. If the use of this image on Wikipedia is a copyright violation, please follow the steps at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion to nominate this image to be deleted. If you have any questions, please feel free to post a message on my talk page. —Bkell 17:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

• Image:Destro.jpg
• Image:Gijoesigma6.jpg
• Image:Hawkgijoe.jpg

Thanks for revisiting these image description pages, but "edited Web screenshot" and "edited image" don't give any information about the source or copyright status of these images. Wikipedia cannot use copyrighted images without the permission of the copyright holder, except when the use of such images falls under "fair use" (read the fair use article for more information). We must establish, for every image on Wikipedia, that the use of this image in Wikipedia articles is legal under United States copyright law. This is the purpose of all those image copyright tags.

You need to go back to these images and, for each one, clearly state the original source and choose an appropriate image copyright tag that accurately describes the license the image is being used under. If we cannot establish the original source and license that allows an image to be used on Wikipedia, we must unfortunately delete the image to avoid violating U.S. copyright law.

Again, if you have any questions about all this, or would like some help in determining which copyright tag to use, please post a message on my talk page. —Bkell 08:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I see you've changed the tags on these images back to {{web-screenshot}}. Now we're back where we started. The problem with the {{web-screenshot}} tag on these images is that they are not images of Web pages. They are pictures of G.I. Joe characters, not Web pages. So the {{web-screenshot}} tag does not apply to these images and cannot justify their use on Wikipedia.

We must have source and license information for all images on Wikipedia. This is not just some annoying Wikipedia policy; we need this information because we must comply with United States laws. I see you have included source information for Image:Destro.jpg, but the other two have no information at all about where they came from. And none of these three has any justification for why their use on Wikipedia is legal under United States copyright law. Please find out if these images can legally be used on Wikipedia by contacting the copyright holder. If the copyright holder gives this permission, then you need to look through the list of image copyright tags and select the appropriate tag from this list (if none of them fit quite right, choose the nearest approximation and then give more details in a paragraph below the tag). If we do not have permission from the copyright holder to use this image, then we must delete it, unless it happens to satisfy the four requirements necessary to qualify as fair use. In this case, you can choose one of the fair use tags to use on the image description page. If it turns out that the use of these images is a copyright violation, then you can follow the steps at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion to nominate them to be deleted.

Please spend some time fixing these problems. If I can be of any help to you, post a message on my talk page. —Bkell 18:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Destro.jpg looks fine now. It has a source and a copyright tag that makes sense. However, the other two images, Image:Gijoesigma6.jpg and Image:Hawkgijoe.jpg, are still missing source information. If you got them from a Web page, the address of the Web page would be all that's needed. Sorry to keep bothering you like this, but we really need this information. —Bkell 05:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Before you continue creating more articles on seasons of 24, please check that what you are writing is not already well-covered at 24 (television), as otherwise your pages may be deleted or merged and your work wasted.

Thanks for your contributions! Stifle 14:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Joes2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. Steve block talk 13:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, You forgot Cover girl (see evidences) http://www.yojoe.com/comics/image/image16.jpg - Comic Cover http://www.jrxtoys.de/html/TOYS/GI-JOE/1983/1983%20Loose/JRX_TOYS_GIJOE_START_1983_Loose_1_CoverGirl_1.htm - Toy loose http://www.geocities.com/gijoeunique/ob/ob_1cover.jpg - Marvel Comic http://www.fantasykat.com/shows/gijoe.html - Toon (look for Cover Girl) http://www.yojoe.com/feature/fcs/covergirl/index.shtml - everything

I got your message. I was a big fan of GIJOE and I notice that you did not complete listing of characters. I have seen Cover Girl often in comic books and cartoon. I am talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.I._Joe:_A_Real_American_Hero and I wonder if you have fix this connecting to catorgy GIJOE that has complete listing of characters? I put "more information...." under your character list. Have you read his message? ""Category:G.I. Joe Hi. Since Category:G.I. Joe characters is already a subcategory of Category:G.I. Joe, there's no need to include articles in both categories. The practice here is to include articles that belong in the subcategory only in the subcategory, otherwise it's redundant. Cheers! BD2412 talk 23:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC""

Hi Destron. I just had an Admin (Coredesat) wipe out my entire Action Man wiki page, on the grounds that it was too promotional... he didn't use the discussion page, or explain what he felt was 'promotional'.. have you ever run into anything like this? I reverted to an earlier edit, but I'm assuming he'll do it again. What recourse do we have? Can I complain to someone? It does not seem right.... Hholland 15:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gijoesigma6.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 10:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks, Destron! I'll take a look at the site indicated.

yours,

Hholland —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hholland (talk • contribs) 16:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Destron Commander, is there anyway you can fix the picture placement on the Joe Wiki banner? It looks like it's glitched because the picture hides some of the text. I was gonna pull it off the Larry Hama page, but I see you've put them everywhere.

Thanks! Everyone understands the knife. (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JoeWiki.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

This image primarily consists of logos copied from GI Joe packaging, making it non-free. You labeled it as being under the GNU Free Documentation License, which is not the case. Non-free images like this cannot be used in templates such as {{JoeWiki}}. So I went and changed {{JoeWiki}} to use text instead.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Allstarlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Destro.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever ^(klaT) 22:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Serpentor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stella Bonasera, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Stella Bonasera. Travellingcari (talk) 02:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC

Hi there, I left the message out of courtesy because you had worked on the article and I wanted to let you know why I had proposed it for deletion in case you had input you wanted to add. That's all. Travellingcari (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Sigma6cc.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Sigma6duke.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Image:Serpentor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Serpentor.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish (talk) 07:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Gijoeextreme.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Hawkgijoe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:KFC sg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Merlion poem.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:EdwinThumboo-UlyssesbytheMerlion-20080321.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:EdwinThumboo-UlyssesbytheMerlion-20080321.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just informing you of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional places in G.I. Joe (2nd nomination) as you seem to be one of the main G.I. Joe editors. BOZ (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Macau Tower Center.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Would you look at Snake-Eyes page at the bottom you'll find a section labeled 2009 film with a movie plot could i get your opinion whether the movie plot should be their like that or deleted because some IP keeps deleting it The Movie Master 1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC).Reply

That trivia should probably be best left out in the movie article. --Destron Commander (talk) 09:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm asking all project members to participate in this discussion. Thanks!--Flash176 (soon to be rechristened as Ridge Runner) (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion has begun about whether the article Conquest X-30, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest X-30 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Divebomb (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion has begun about whether the article ROCC, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROCC until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Divebomb (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

With regard to your recent edits: please see WP:MOVE#Before_moving_a_page:

Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, because doing so fragments the edit history.

I'll get this particular move fixed; don't worry about this one, just a note for next time you rename a page. Thanks and regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 17:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello... thanks for you contributions. Unfortunately, the links to the external wiki have had to be removed. Generally speaking, we do not link to fan sites or wikis, especially ones with a relatively small pool of editors and articles. Please feel free to ask if you have questions about this. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 17:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:HIMYMWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:TARWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 Template:JoeWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:World-of-krypton 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 Template:JoeWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 Template:TARWiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotshot (stock character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotshot (stock character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Brainiac attacks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marissa Faireborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marissa Faireborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Iron Grenadiers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT+WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Defiant (G.I. Joe) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiant (G.I. Joe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terror Drome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror Drome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iron Grenadiers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Grenadiers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article USS Flagg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There isn't WP:SIGCOV for this topic outside of primary sources. WP:BEFORE only revealed brief coverage that does not support a stand-alone Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 00:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply