User talk:David.moreno72/Archive 13

Kindly review & fix the article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kamal_Mustafa_(DJ) Pak-ISI-Official (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt attention David. Even though my proposed page didn't meet Wikipedia's QA standards, I appreciate your time. I now know a lot more about Wikipedia than I did a week ago...

DMFUG (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hey David, would you mind taking a look at this page please? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hector_Carreon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petemayor (talk • contribs) 04:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

• Aleeereza (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Checkbook.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for reviewing the submission. Per wikipedia guideline(s):

"significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondarysources that are independent of the subject:"

Here are some citations, I've included them in the submission article too. As you'll notice there are multiple citations spanning about 2 years

May 2016 https://www.ca.com/us/modern-software-factory/content/the-company-checkbook-goes-paperless.html Wired.com (both online and in paper form, alexa rank ~450 in the US ) is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

July 2016 http://www.digitaltransactions.net/with-checkbook-a-payments-veteran-creates-a-souped-up-engine-for-check-21-clearing/ Digital Transactions is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Aug 2017 https://theamericangenius.com/tech-news/checkbook-device/ American Genius is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Oct 2017 https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/checkbookio-offers-digital-checks-and-invoicing-services Accounting Today is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

Aleeereza (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

I did not submit User:BrendonTheWizard/Dolly (soft drink). Why did you add a "submission declined" template? It was unsubmitted, marked as a draft, and had an alert at the top saying it was being translated. It was a userspace work in progress never put in draftspace or submitted for review. Please revert this or allow me to revert it myself. Thank you. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 04:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Nevermind, an anonymous IP editor submitted it while vandalizing the draft. I have rolled back to before their edit. My apologies that you had to review it. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 04:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

As per your feedback, I had made enough research about my friend Ram Manjjonaath who is an upcoming cine actor/stage artiste/ IT, consultant. He is having enough limelight in the Kannada cine industry and is on the path of success. I would be very much honored if you could move the draft to article as Wikipedia is very helpful in recognizing and encouraging new as well as successful talents. I have made sure that this looks more like a Wikipedia article rather than looking like a self-advertising page as what you had stated.I would request you to give thsi article a chance and do he needfull. in case you feel anymore correction I would be more th3 happy to do so.Sandeep5318 article creator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ram_Manjjonaath — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.145.180.59 (talk) 09:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Yea, I was going to decline it too, but how do I sign up to become a reviewer too?--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

@Thegooduser:. If you wish to become a reviewer please see WP:WPAFC/P. Thank you David.moreno72 03:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for the inconvienient, I'm learning how to edit with my class of the UNIPD university, hope there is no problem right now, isn't it? Have a good day, manofredda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manofredda (talk • contribs) 12:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

I was writing in a course and i copied the text from an existing article Language policy within a saminary of Univesity of Padua. I forgot to specify in the edit summary the source of the original text. I will be more carefull next time. --Brina95 (talk) 13:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

As I am a first time user, I tried to do as much as possible. Can you please tell me if I send you the information and source are you able to do the pace? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamaron83 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello 👋

I saw that you rejected my article about producer and artist Erik Wikholm.

I’ve tried to read up on the guidelines, but I’m still not sure the reason it was rejected. Since your decision, I have tried my best to update the article with relevant information and references that I could find.

Would really appreciate if you could have another look at it and see if it would pass now, with more information.

Thanks for your time.

Cheers!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lordofthefloor/sandbox?markasread=151070644&markasreadwiki=enwiki

Lordofthefloor (talk) 21:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey there! I have updates the article with more content with relevant references, hope this helps.

Cheers! Lordofthefloor (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello David.moreno72,

Reviewer of the Year

 

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello @David.moreno72: Thank you for removing copyright violations from the draft. If you have any other feedback on the article is would be greatly appreciated. Please do at this Cardano talk page so everybody can see. Otherwise, thank you for your time :-) --FlippyFlink (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Can you complete my page or pls help me in completing (Divya krishnan) Abidn2 (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hey, you declined my contributions to the article Date Gone Wrong. I've added more citations, I request you to review it again. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Date_Gone_Wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditi.agrawal.07 (talk • contribs) 11:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

I have checked Wikipedia tutorials and templates and I have updated my first page that was declined and I hope you will re-check it after the update and consider publishing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rorosab (talk • contribs) 17:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 

Thanks for reviewing my first wiki page! Your feedback was greatly appreciated! (Also congrats on being a wiki user for 7 years and 3 days.)

Cactusempire1414 (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello Mr. David Moreno,

I recently tried (for the first time) to contribute to a Wikipedia page and found the reason for not being able to provide cross referencing...how is this possible if the article I am writing is the first one to start the potential for a cross referencing??? I thought the whole point to contributing to main article or story was to build it up and provide the audience an in depth view...I feel that my rejected article contribution was not what I would expect under the circumstances to shed some sort of "fun facts" especially if it's related...and no one else would know about the back story because I was present at the beginning. Was there another method or process I should have been focusing on??? Should I have created a primary page for the article I was contributing? This is all new to me, so any info would help.

Thanks for your time,

Sincerly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgocobachi (talk • contribs) 22:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Dear David.moreno72, I'm a kid, and I wanted to make an article. You rejected it. Why? It is reliable (bbc) and you have no right to delete it. The page blackle.com is a website that is less popular than kiddle.co, and yet that was not removed? Please re consider your review. I am new to wikipedia and need to know what was wrong, because it was relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron Justin Giebel (talk • contribs) 00:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Aaron Justin Giebel:. I have not deleted the article. The acceptance of an article is not dependent on the existence of other articles. If you think that the blackle.com page is not notable, you are welcome to nominate it for deletion. In regards to the article you submitted, the main requirement is that is must pass WP:GNG. This is normally established by referencing at least 3 independent, reliable sources. Reference 1 - not applicable. Reference 2 3 and 4 - These satisfy the independent and reliable clause, but they essentially report on the same story, and so can be considered as a single source. There other issues that I have noted. For instance, there is a claim that it is powered by 'Google Custom Search, with minor refinements'. Where is the reference to support this? Or the claim 'It's first three results are of a easy reading level for a kid.' Where is the reference to support this? Or 'Kiddle's main competitor is kidzsearch.com, and both are used by millions.'. The reference supplied does not verify the claim, so where is the reference to support this? Also, the general tone of the article needs to be cleaned up. I hope this has helped. Thank you David.moreno72 01:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

if you want to know, go to kiddle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron Justin Giebel (talk • contribs) 01:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

Can you please review the user's nosebagbear comments below and on the page regarding web notability for my submission? The author was awarded a ruben award by national cartoonist society. Can you please provide input as to why this can't pass notability and what else I can do to get this published? I understand not everything is suitable for wikipedia but this is a recognized comic and award winning comic strip. Please let me know your thoughts

Comment: Addendum: I do however believe that this may well trip over other AfC criteria before being accepted. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: TO OTHER REVIEWERS: I suspect that this draft may presumptively pass Web notability by criterion 2, due to the National Cartoonists' Reuben award.

This would need to be supported/demonstrated by a secondary source, but would avoid the whole "multiple reviews" etc, aspect. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Sportsfan018 (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sportsfan018. The award (NCS Division Award) was for the author, not the cartoon. If the article was about the author, then it would help in establishing notability, but the article isn't about the author, so it doesn't apply. To satisfy WP:GNG, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, which in this case, is the cartoon, not the author. There needs to be at least 3 independent, reliable sources that have significant coverage about the cartoon, or a major award that has been awarded to the cartoon, not the author. For instance, here is an award that has been given to the cartoon Bizarro http://kingfeatures.com/2004/03/bizarro-wins-genesis-award-for-outstanding-cartoon/ , but the author is Dan Piraro. Thank you David.moreno72 03:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks David. Question, if I change the article to be about the author and list his book and award and include a section to describe the comic would that be acceptable or is there anything else missing? Thank you Sportsfan018 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

dear David,

When you're done deleting my admission of the Freewheelers Cello Band, can you also completely delete my profile please? I have nothing with wikipedia.

regards, Bas Vossen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basvossen (talk • contribs) 17:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hii

I have added a number of links which show that he has acted as a singer in many films, which is mentioned in the film Wikipedia page with the name. I also enclosed the Imdb link in which all the singer data is present. You will reconsider this and publish it

Respect Gsswiki5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsswiki5 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi David,

Since you reviewed and rejected by drafts for both Buni and its author Ryan Pagelow I am a bit confused here. When I submitted the draft for the comic you mentioned the award was given to the author which would help establish notability and not the comic. so I created the article about the author and noted the award, how is it decided that its not significant? please note that Ryan Pagelow is already mentioned on other Wikipedia articles noting webcomic awards https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_webcomic_awards and I was planning on creating the link to his name from that article to this article. I am really confused here as he is already mentioned in multiple articles on Wikipedia already. how is that not notable/significant to create the contribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsfan018 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sportsfan018. Yes that is one reference that helps, but to satisfy WP:GNG, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, that is several paragraphs. Thank you David.moreno72 08:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, David kindly help me out why my article has been rejected by you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camando2 2000 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, this person fits WP:NACADEMIC, namely criteria 1 and criteria 3. Criteria 1: He is one of the most cited scientists in his field (please check the referenced google scholar citation page and note that as of now he has been cited more than 21000 times). Criteria 3: He is a fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, as noted in the reference document from the AIMBE website. Scientists with far less scholarly merit have their page approved so I'm surprised this keeps getting rejected. Even his PhD student has a page!

162.129.251.103 (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi 162.129.251.103. Thank you for your comment. You are indeed correct, the subject does satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. If could resubmit and make the same comments as you did here, I'm sure it will be accepted. In the meantime, if there are any other news items or reliable references that can add to the bio, that would make the chances of acceptance even higher. Thank you David.moreno72 01:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi David,

Since you reviewed and rejected by drafts for both Buni and its author Ryan Pagelow I am a bit confused here. When I submitted the draft for the comic you mentioned the award was given to the author which would help establish notability and not the comic. so I created the article about the author and noted the award, how is it decided that its not significant? please note that Ryan Pagelow is already mentioned on other Wikipedia articles noting webcomic awards https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_webcomic_awards and I was planning on creating the link to his name from that article to this article. I am really confused here as he is already mentioned in multiple articles on Wikipedia already. how is that not notable/significant to create the contribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsfan018 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sportsfan018. Yes that is one reference that helps, but to satisfy WP:GNG, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, that is several paragraphs. Thank you David.moreno72 08:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, David kindly help me out why my article has been rejected by you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camando2 2000 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, this person fits WP:NACADEMIC, namely criteria 1 and criteria 3. Criteria 1: He is one of the most cited scientists in his field (please check the referenced google scholar citation page and note that as of now he has been cited more than 21000 times). Criteria 3: He is a fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, as noted in the reference document from the AIMBE website. Scientists with far less scholarly merit have their page approved so I'm surprised this keeps getting rejected. Even his PhD student has a page!

162.129.251.103 (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi 162.129.251.103. Thank you for your comment. You are indeed correct, the subject does satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. If could resubmit and make the same comments as you did here, I'm sure it will be accepted. In the meantime, if there are any other news items or reliable references that can add to the bio, that would make the chances of acceptance even higher. Thank you David.moreno72 01:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi David.moreno72,

I am interested to get some more information why the Ology Bioservices page was rejected... is it because it's a stub, because it's too similar to the Nanotherapeutics page (pages should be combined), because it doesn't have any references, or just because it doesn't have sufficient interest yet?

Thanks, JdiannarelliJdiannarelli (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi David, I am a marine biologist from Italy, I have been researching diving instruments and especially dive watches for 18 years, I find most of the entries realted to dive watches are marketing driven, in fact all the real beauty of this genre is burried between marketing lines of the 3 major watch groups from Switzerland, that is why it seems that everytime I like to add some information to the the history of the dive watch they get deleted, although I try to support my edits by patent documents. Do you see the point? I am trying to bring real history to the shine but the shadows of the big marketing guys seem to be able to stop the truth from surfacing on wikipedia. I really wish you can do some deep reasearch before editing and deleting, best regards, P.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrizia Santi (talk • contribs) 08:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi David, Hope you good. Could you tell me the advice / suggestion to improve my rejected article "Agaram InfoTech Private Limited". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthik Dev81 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Karthik Dev81:. To have an article in Wikipedia, they MUST satisfy WP:GNG. That is, they have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A single mention, or one sentence is simply not enough. Only once you are unable to demonstrate notability, then it will have a good chance of being accepted. Thank you. David.moreno72 04:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Solving an open problem for 35 years posed 3 times by 1 of the most prominent living probabilists (Rick Durrett) is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia? Can you please elaborate on your criteria and motives for censoring an honest fan of mathematics?

Hi @Rmor312:. To have an article in Wikipedia, they MUST satisfy WP:GNG. That is, they have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thank you. David.moreno72 11:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @David.moreno72:. Can you please be more specific by giving an example: That is, please for example look at Prof Rick Durrett's Wiki article and point out exactly how is WP:GNG met in contrast to the article I authored for Prof Tzioufas? Please note that there are 3 external links in the debated article and exact references. In particular you may wish to receive advise from the page of the contact process where the contributions are made specific.

Is it compulsory according to you that all people have a wiki page are fellows of the American Mathematical Society, or other societies, or they have received a medal of sorts? that is interesting since that would exclude for example Gregori Perelman

What is really obscure is that provided that every sentence is backed up by a link to a scientific journal and another wiki page, isn't it somewhat arbitrary to reject these sources as "non-reliable"? User:Rmor312

Hi @Rmor312:. Your subject MUST satisfy WP:GNG, or WP:ACADEMIC. In regards to Prof Rick Durrett, he clearly satisfies criteria 3 of WP:ACADEMIC, as he is a fellow of the American Mathematical Society. Gregori Perelman easily satisfies criteria 2, having been awarded the Fields Medal (although he declined it) and the Millennium Prize. If you are able to demonstrate, by independent reliable sources, that Tzioufas is able to satisfy any of the criteria in WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC, then by all means, add them to the page and resubmit. Thank you David.moreno72 06:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Mkbisht88 (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Dear Mr. David can you explan me why my article Draft:Jindal_Poly_Films_Ltd is rejected, please help us to make it published in wikipedia.

Can you please review my draft Divya krishnan. Let me know the changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abidn2 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi there. We are all volunteers here. AFC Drafts are reviewed in no specific order. Please be patient, your article will be reviewed soon. Thanks. --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

I have added more reference, and made changes to the draft with help of ishwar Looking for ur feedback Abidn2 (talk) 11:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 

Hello David.moreno72,

News

• The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

• Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
• {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
• A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
• There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

• NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

• Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
• copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
• The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Could you please help me to revise my page again. There is still a lot of content missing, but I think that in one year we could make this page notable enough. Plagiarism is a serious crime, and I am concerned with it, as I have many things published online, including academic content. I am part of international press, so if you are seeking help as well, please let me know.

Best regards, Bruna Pickler

Brunapickler (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Brunapickler:. You do not satisfy WP:GNG, and violates WP:AUTO. Please do not resubmit. Thank you David.moreno72 07:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear David.moreno72 Thank you for the review. As it is declined I want to share few reasons why it is still has scope for publication. Even if you think it has no scope please share the ways to improve at "sequence" article.

1. The subject not exist in Wikipedia at "Sequence" also except few mentions like "Defining a sequence by recursion" there are no mentions about sequences I sent

2. The derivation of nth term and finding summation of n terms is completely new.

3. Especially The sequences of type 3 in the mentioned article are completely new version and the promotion of which can be a new contribution

223.238.119.223 (talk) 16:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC) aditya332

I only have The Curse of Mr. Bean on my watchlist but this editor introduced Americanisms into a British article. Such as "stomps on", where anyone whose read an Enid Blyton tale knows that a British child "stamps" their foot. They also changed the (British) term "small girl" into the (American style) "little girl". There made need to be intervention? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 08:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

• HippoGamesUnity (talk · contribs)
  • User:HippoGamesUnity/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I'm about reviewing of my article. You said me that it's refer to 'Pixel-art scaling algorithms', but my article is about rotating pixel art, not about scaling. The suggested algorithm doesn't change image size (though it uses upscaling and downscaling as middle steps). Are you sure it can't be published as a separate article? Thanks for reviewing and good luck!

HippoGamesUnity (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LEDC, Canlubang. Since you had some involvement with the LEDC, Canlubang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. hueman1 (talk) 10:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi David,

I see that you removed by page on Za. Could you elaborate?

Thanks, Chris

ChrisFindon1 (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

You had rejected my submission stating it is not important to be included in wiki. To justify my part, G D Vashist is the world’s only Astro- Scientist who combines science with astrology. He spent a lifetime researching in perfecting astrology, correcting its current flaws and come to apt predictions. People believe in him and come to him for life advice. Finally, he is an influencer and does good for society as well by providing jobs and financial aid for the needy. Kindly consider all this and approve my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkx (talk • contribs) 10:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I am in the process of constructing a page Ken Davis Music - about the artist and the music. Perhaps I was premature in submitting the page however you rejected it on the basis of not being noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. I wonder if you'd be kind enough to explain. Also, the conflict of interest is not appropriate. I have Known Ken as a fan since his performances in the early 1980s. Because of my experience in online product development (my company developed YesBoookit now part of Expedia) he has engaged my to assist with a Wikipedia page for him. Thanks, Regards Kevin

Hi, Are you able to respond to my query regarding Ken Davis Music not being notable enough for Wikipedia. Can you please explain? Thanks regards Kevin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinbade (talk • contribs) 06:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 

Hello David.moreno72,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

A few months ago I made an article that was rejected, I received some comments from you about how to correct it to be approved, but I have not received any response since then.

Can you tell me what to do? or what is the next step? Thank you.

Juanestebanp94 (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

 

Hello David.moreno72,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

kindly publish this article. regards Camando2 2000 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

As a member of the legislature he is unquestionably notable. I'm going to accept the article. DGG ( talk ) 11:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

• Mrisemin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Yemi Morafa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mrisemin (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

Regarding the article, 'Yemi Morafa', which you deleted on the 15th of September, I've some changes based on your requests. I've removed the IMDB links. I've also removed some YouTube links. However, with the other YouTube videos, these are samples of the subject's work. He is listed as 'Director' on said videos. And there aren't other references I can use at this time. I hope you can consider them.

Thanks.

i added a link. should i find more info? or resubmit? Baozon90 (talk) 00:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

My page was declined. However iam the manager of Kyshawn "IamYoungHitta" Wyman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ieshahogans (talk • contribs) 12:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

hello David this is my first article i have add more sources and info please look > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ali_mansour and Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamoudelmelegy (talk • contribs) 11:16, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi David.moreno72!

My name is Tony Westling, I read your comment on my draft "Draft:Swedish Video Game Industry" and I read the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability and the shortcut https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LISTN.

"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list." (WP:LISTN).

I've researched on Wikipedia about significant coverage, reliable sources and independent sources.

The research on the stand-alone list has been acquired from an institution called Bolagsverket (Swedish Companies Registration Office, https://bolagsverket.se/en), collected by a person on all registered Swedish video game companies.

Thereafter I've collected data from independent sources from the links in the list and written them there.

The article was inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_gaming_in_Finland and https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataspelsbranschen during work.

User "ToBeCloud" replied me in IRC channel "Other Wikipedias sometimes have lower criteria for inclusion, and/or a less active community to find unsuitable articles and nominate them for deletion The only solution here sadly is to change the target of efforts to areas that are actually useful to the project, if you would like to contribute."

I think this is very interesting and I wonder how the article (AfC) must satisfy WP:LISTN to be published?

Can I ask for your advice about creating the Wikipedia article?

Can a general description of "Swedish Video Game Industry" be helpful to the article?

Thank you for your patience and understanding, and I hope to hear from you.

All the best

Tony Westling "TonyWestling-Dataspelsbranschen (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)"

Hi TonyWestling-Dataspelsbranschen. Have a look at the following list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_video_game_developers Please note that ALL, I repeat ALL, of the companies are notable, that is, they already have a Wikipedia article about them. Please also note that there are NO URL's. If you wish to have your article created it MUST follow Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you David.moreno72 10:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)