Dolescum

 

i understand i was only experamening sorry for all your trouble

Zira456 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Dolescum, Here is an adorable kitten. Signed, the new user that created Rodli, Beskar, Krueger and Pletcher, S.C.

Wikinnikinnic 01:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

 

And here is one unrelated to the bicolor twins.

Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

 

Thank you for the archiving help at Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate.

Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

So I herd you liek kittens, etc, etc.  

--Shirt58 (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  The article Shad Al-Sherif Pasha, which you have contributed to, is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Some reasons that make the article unsuitable are on its Talk page. See, and if desired contribute to, deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shad Al-Sherif Pasha. Pol098 (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dolescum,

I mentioned you in an AN filing (not in a bad way either  :) ). It's here, just in case you wanted to add anything in . KoshVorlon R.I.P Leonard Nimoy "Live Long and Prosper" 11:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just be aware of edit warring on articles. When the other user reverting your tag for the third time the correct procedure would be to take it to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring rather than reverting their edits again. Just a heads up. I've blocked the other user for 24 hours in the interim. Cheers. Glen 08:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Glen: Thanks. I generally try to avoid the drama boards, they look like a good way to get lynched... Dolescum (talk) 08:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi

I need help! I don't know what is meant by this is not the venue, go to DRV. Please advise? Thanks Chrispanto (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I take no side in this edit war, but please start discussing instead.Jeppiz (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be a bit biased against Golden Dawn and people who do not align to your liberalistic worldview. --Sιgε |д･) 07:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An article that you have been involved in editing—Ali-Illahism—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

--MiguelMadeira (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for this.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

User:Beedlebrox, assuming you get this ping, I was watching your contribs and assumed you were ignoring me to decline the request. If you'd be kind enough to remove my talk page privs, that would be wonderful. Dolescum (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Done. GAB^gab 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Rawn Associates. Hi, I noticed you've contributed to an article I've nominated for deletion at AfD and thought you may have views. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply