GrouchoPython

Thanks for your recent edits ;). Stick around.. and feel free to drop any questions my way. Standard welcome follows, WP:TRI is good for balance.

Welcome!

Hello, GrouchoPython, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  ∴ here…♠ 22:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add info without specifying your reference. This edit appears to be vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to test your edits visit the sandbox.(Gordon24fan (talk) 23:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC))Reply

Hi. When you recently edited 2011 in American soccer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County Waves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:SacrementoSurgeLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

puedes traspasarlo al español gran wikipedista te lo agradecería, espero que lo hagas — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExpertoFutbolero2011 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:I-League (USL).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Premier Arena Soccer League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colorado Blizzard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Reid Schmitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reid Schmitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid Schmitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

While I'll concede that the Tucson Extreme website and lack of Facebook page make it appear that Tucson has quietly imploded, do you have a reliable source for this edit removing them from the list of expansion teams? If so, I'd like to use it to update the Tucson Extreme article. If not, on what do you base your assertion that the club has folded? - Dravecky (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Groucho, this is Sparty1301, I'm just wondering where you got the 4-3 score for Detroit City FC vs AFC Cleveland. The correct score was 3-1 Detroit City FC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparty1301 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sparty1301. I thought I typed in a 3-1 score too. Must have got it confused with the South region score RVA FC over Jacksonville FC 4-3. Thanx for the correction.GrouchoPython (talk) 03:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Go City FC!

Sparty1301 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparty1301 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FC Tucson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Defeats San Antonio to advance to third round of Open Cup |publisher=United Soccer Leagues (USL |date=May 21, 2013 |accessdate=August 6, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://azstarnet.com/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've been editing 2013 National Women's Soccer League season almost alone since the beginning of the season. So I would like to thank you so much for your help editing and keeping the article upgraded. Thanks a lot.--SirEdimon (talk) 18:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanx. As long as I was in the neighborhood. 8^)GrouchoPython (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll appreciate if you keep the good work.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Phoenix FC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk) 04:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:IllinoisPiasa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 CONCACAF Under-20 Women's Championship may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2014 in American soccer page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for contributing the excellent 2014 PDL conference standings tables. I'd like to include just the Mountain Division standings in the 2014 FC Tucson season article which would require creation of sub-templates for each division. What do you think? I would be happy to break them all out but thought I would ask you what you think as you are the creator and have been making all the updates.

Usually, I would wait until the season was over and paste the division table in the article. But if you can add a self-updating sub-template to the page, go right ahead. And thanx.GrouchoPython (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I hope the new break-out isn't too painful to update. I floated the [v t e] links for each division on the right to get them out of the way.Gatomasgordo (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

A little harder, but no problem. GrouchoPython (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:LAGalaxyII.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 12:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Since File:Los Angeles Galaxy II 2014.svg has better resolution then my original file (File:LAGalaxyII.jpeg), I readily consent to its being deleted.GrouchoPython (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, in that case you need do nothing; the speedy deletion process will take care of it. I would have been remiss in my duty had I not left a message about it, however! Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 16:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:AUSC-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:KWUnitedLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:LaneUnitedFC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 22:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

You can delete LaneUnitedFC.jpg. SVG is always better than JPG.GrouchoPython (talk) 23:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The USL Pro standings table has listed that GD is the 2nd tiebreaker criteria after points; however the USL's official standings seems to use pts, Wins, GD, instead. (Thus Wilmington is ahead because they have 8 wins while Rochester only has 7 even though Rochester has a better GD). Do you know if this is documented? If it is we should update the template so that it properly reflects the this criteria. --Trödel 14:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The 2014 USL Pro Media Guide (available online) Tie-Breaker procedure says this:

Standings tiebreakers

The breaking of ties in the final league standings, playoffs and finals is accomplished by applying the following criteria, listed in order of importance:

The following two guidelines will be followed during the implementation of USL tiebreakers for all ties involving three or more teams:

1) The tiebreaker will determine the winner first.

2) The tiebreaker will continue to be followed in order to determine the ranking of the remaining teams without restarting from the beginning.

1) Head-to-head record based on total points in league games

2) Total wins in league games

3) Goal difference in league games

4) Goals scored in league games

5) Total points within smallest grouping. If number of games is unequal, then point percentage will be used.

6) Ranking based on points earned against top four group finishers. This tiebreaker will not be used if four or fewer teams comprise the group. If number of games is unequal, then point percentage applies.

7) Point percentage outside/smallest division or conference in League games

8) Total points in all regular season and Open Cup Qualifying games combined. If number of games is unequal, then point percentage applies

9) FIFA Fair Play – Team with fewest disciplinary points in League games. (If number of games is unequal, points will be divided by games played to arrive at a common basis for comparison.)

10) Lottery conducted by USL at league office Point Percentage: number of total points earned / maximum possible points (3 per game)

• Should more than two teams involved have played each other an UNEQUAL number of times, this tiebreaker will be skipped.

• Group: term used to describe the primary unit in which a team competes (i.e. PDL – Southwest Division)

• Point Percentage: number of total points earned / maximum possible points (3 per game)

So it seems to me that Head-to-Head result is the first tie-breaker. The legend should be changed on the USL Pro standings template, but I don't know how.GrouchoPython (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Someone else and I both updated the tie-breaker criteria in the footer. :) --Trödel 00:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Clarity is always good. :)GrouchoPython (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tulsa-Roughnecks-FC-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok. All you have to do is revert this edits. Guilherme (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I appreciate that. BTW, your AET wiki link was better than mine so I kept it and changed it on the other USL Pro seasons. Gotta stay consistent. :) GrouchoPython (talk) 02:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for all you do on the USL Pages, but did you mean to move the info box from the right hand side to the top? Thought I would ask before I moved it back. jefftfsufiji@gmail.com

Jeff Thompson, Florida, USA 17:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Which page? I can't find it. I don't believe I did move the infobox, at least not deliberately.GrouchoPython (talk) 22:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Timbers2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thanks for the update regarding the Rattlers. I also just created a separate Sports in Phoenix page. Please feel free to update that page as well. I'm going to be trimming down the sports section on the main Phoenix page, to bring it more in line to other city pages which have GA or FA status. Thanks! Onel5969 (talk) 12:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hibackatcha! Sports in Phoenix is updated. Good idea what you're doing. GrouchoPython (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:IllinoisPiasa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm letting you know that there has been a discussion regarding the US Pyramid: Talk:United States soccer league system#ASL's place in the pyramid. I probably stepped in it by adding ASL without researching that league at all; however, the broader discussion of how to order the leagues that are not sanctioned by USSF is also being included. Would love to hear input from frequent editors of the lower division league and club pages. Thx --Trödel 20:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think we should avoid linking to USL (soccer) for now because it is likely that the United Soccer League (2010) will be moved and then all the USL (soccer) links will become double redirects and not work. --Trödel 14:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK. I'll hold off then.GrouchoPython (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

The move was unchallenged so I did it today, The new link for the league is United Soccer League and I have updated USL (soccer) to redirect to that page. --Trödel 18:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK. Thanx.GrouchoPython (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Saint Louis FC page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:PalmBeachSunsFC.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:AZStrikersFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 22:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's been replaced with an svg version. You can delete this one.GrouchoPython (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChicagoMustangsPASL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:DetroitWaza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:PDLlogo2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Walter Görlitz accidentally deleted the logo from the PDL page. It has been restored by him.GrouchoPython (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, GrouchoPython. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 08:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Western Conference (USL), GrouchoPython!

Wikipedia editor Tom29739 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

More references

To reply, leave a comment on Tom29739's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 

Thanks for uploading File:PDLlogo2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and delete. It's been replaced with a much better one.GrouchoPython (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:USL club table page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit that created the broken reference name error has been reversed.GrouchoPython (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:SYL Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you please update the dates accompanying career stats tables. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Which ones didn't I update? Can't find them. I updated the career stats for Phoenix Rising players only.GrouchoPython (talk) 23:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 Template:PDL Central Pacific has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some content you contributed to is being considered for discussion for destruction at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 3 Trackinfo (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on 2012 FC Tucson season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jay eyem (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 FC Tucson season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 FC Tucson season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jay eyem (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:PalmBeachSunsFC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re-added PalmBeachSunsFC.jpg logo to the main body of the Next Academy Palm Beach article.GrouchoPython (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:National Premier Soccer League logo 2016.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see that you made an edit to the NWSL Awards Page. I've started a discussion on the talk page about converting those awards lists into sortable tables. I would really appreciate it if you put your 2 cents into it. Thanks! WoSoFan (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cincinnati Dutch Lions Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and delete. It's been replaced with a better PNG.GrouchoPython (talk) 04:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, 2019 Phoenix Rising FC season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green Bay Voyageurs FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Bay Voyageurs FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mobile Mini Sun Cup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Weston FC, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, GrouchoPython. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weston FC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moshe Perez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshe Perez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer T·C 08:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarasota Metropolis FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarasota Metropolis FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Premier Arena Soccer League summer season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 USL Championship season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anaheimbolts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:CincinnatiKings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Rufat Dadashov article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 20:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Greg Hurst, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Greg Hurst, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 18:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2017 NASL fall season results has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2017 NASL spring season results has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2015 USL Eastern Conference table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2015 USL Western Conference table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2016 USL Eastern Conference table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2016 USL Western Conference table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

hello! i am working on the draft of Queensboro FC owner, Draft:Jonathan A. Krane i dont know much about USLC was wondering if you could take a look? Seigerman (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birmingham Legion FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enzo Martínez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I see you added Brazos Valley Cavalry FC back to the list of USL League Two 2023 clubs. I visited 2023 Clubs and still don't see that they are listed as a team in the league. I too believe they will be based on USOC entrance under USL 2, but was wondering where you got this information? Demt1298 (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The recently released 2023 schedule has them listed as active. GrouchoPython (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the edit. The problem I'm having now is that the editors won't release it as a regular wiki page until there are more local references. I've been searching, but the communications department of LAFC isn't putting out enough information for the media to pickup. I had this as a stand-alone page on Wikipedia for at least one month before the editors pulled it back and made it a draft. Roberto221 (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:I-League (USL).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@GrouchoPython I wanted to comment on your recent change of team names on the USL League Two article. I saw something (I don't remember what) that suggested Brazos Valley changed Twin City Toucans at the beginning of the year too, but when you go to USL2 website it still lists the team as Brazos Valley. If you have a resource to show the name change it would be great. Otherwise I think USL2 still considers them Brazos Valley. Demt1298 (talk) 17:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@GrouchoPythonThank You for adding the reference. Demt1298 (talk) 22:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

no prob GrouchoPython (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, This is Logan Z Man 2022! I was wondering if you could check the tables and the inforbox for the 2023 USL League two season as well as help with the table for the 2023 NPSL Season. Please respond as soon as possible. Sincerely, Logan Z Man 2022! Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 21:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I've completed the update on the 2023 National Premier Soccer League page (including the infobox). I'll work on the 2023 USL League Two season page now.```` GrouchoPython (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

You messed up the NPSL season page by putting incorrect playoff information and messing up team names. In the future, please don't do this. ColeTrain4EVER (talk) 23:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

2023 USL League two season is updated also.```` GrouchoPython (talk) 07:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

when I asked you to update the 2023 NPSL Season page, I didn't mean remake all the tables and undo some of the work me and a friend were doing. All I asked were updates to the scores and standings and inboxes. I noticed quite a few errors. I don't mean to come across as rude but with the NPSL we do the standings differently. Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 01:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fine. I won't touch it anymore. It's pretty obvious I don't know what I'm doing.```` GrouchoPython (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't saying you can't. me and Coletrain are saying please be careful next time. Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 USL Championship season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilmer Cabrera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The three articles listed in the disambiguation page do not have birth dates as part of the article titles, so I don't see any error. GrouchoPython (talk) 10:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I've noticed you edit quite a few USL pages and so I wanted to mention that I started an unofficial USL editor project/group in one of my userpages. Letting it be a collective place to chart out projects that folks interested in USL can work on individually or collaboratively.

Feel free to edit the page(s) with your own goals or just use it as a reference point for anything you may want to work on.

If nothing else, I appreciate all the edits you do! Happy holidays! Christiangamer7 (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

Can you please see Template talk:2024 USL Championship Eastern Conference table#Playoffs link?

Thanks! Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article George Malki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Existing articles all WP:ROUTINE. Search pulls two additional stories (here and here), which still results in a lack of GNG required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article All-time Phoenix FC roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not seeing the needed sources for the WP:LISTN to be met here. The only source is the league website, which isn't independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply