Glatisant

Here's some music for you. Glatisant (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

for copyediting in the articles, I´ve started. Would you mind to check my last expansion of Leoš Janáček?? I´m sure it´s imperfect... Thanks again Vejvančický (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Under some of the clarinet keys is a little spring, indispensable for the playing, and probably that spring was broken. I´ve found the source again, it´s typo there. My source (the score) says it´s key string. I´ve used the formulation without careful checking. Thank you for your notice, I´ll fix it. Vejvančický (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ralph Hale Mottram, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: R. H. Mottram. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I made a mistake, but corrected it. The last thing I want in the world is to confuse a bot! The article is now titled Ralph Hale Mottram and the redirect R.H. Mottram, which, I think, is an improvement. Glatisant (talk) 01:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Ralph Hale Mottram a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thanks for checking the article, I appreciate this! I´ve added some more important facts on Janáček currently. By the way, I´m a bookseller in the Czech Republic :) Have a nice day Vejvančický (talk) 15:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You wrote

That's a fascinating article on Bartók's night music. I was wondering if other composers could be said to have composed night music, too - was it a genre? I'm thinking of Hindemith's In einer Nacht for piano, and maybe I could find a few Szymanowski pieces. By the way, all mp3's of audible music are Not Available anymore. Could you find them again? Best wishes, Soczyczi (talk) 22:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

a while ago. I haven't been very active lately but finaaly have some time again. I wondered myself how we can delineate and mark the borders of 'night music' both within Bartók's works, and in all classical music. i think wikipedia is not the place for research and debate, but if you want to add to the article that would be great. I am living in Holland myself, Den Haag to be precise. I you want to contact me, you can e-mail to kenessey at zonnet dot nl. RobertKennesy (talk) 19:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for your message. I did not realize the image was not in the public domain. Please be so kind as to let me know when you post your images, I am curious to see them. Regards, Haiduc (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I see that you have recently started editing using a different username. Per WP:UNC, you should request the username change following that procedure so that our records are updated.

Also, your reversion of deleted content by an anon IP to Fred MacMurray had the effect of restoring some unsourced, defamatory content added a short time previously yesterday by another anon IP. I had already warned the first IP about adding unsourced, unverifiable content of this nature after the second anon IP undid it.  JGHowes  ^talk 12:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see, you are right, concerning MacMurray. As for the first part of your message, I started as Glatisant in June 2008, not 'recently'. I don't think it's any use doing it again the red tape way after eight months and thousands of edits (mainly on the Dutch wikipedia). Glatisant 15:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Dear Glatisant, http://17emesiecle.free.fr/Corneille.php http://nitescence.free.fr/noblesse.htm Coat of Arms was handed together with letters of nobility to Pierre Corneille's Father in January 1637 by King Louis XIII so that his son would be regarded as born noble, this as a token of appreciation for writing 'Le Cid'. The title handed to Corneille was Esquire, in 1669 similar letters were handed in favor of Pierre and Thomas Corneille, this time accompanied by the title Chevalier. Pierre Corneille was one of my ancestors as established trough genealogical research. I hope this answers the question you posted in your changes to the article Pierre Corneille. Warmest Regards, Vonsaxen--Vonsaxen (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

A few more links to establish this fact: http://www.nndb.com/people/159/000025084/ http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/m-franois-guizot/corneille-and-his-times-ziu/page-29-corneille-and-his-times-ziu.shtml

Thank you for your time and consideration. --Vonsaxen (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just read through your changes and am delighted with what you have done. Thanks again Weglinde (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your excellent article about a marvelous parish close. Glatisant (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I copied here my comment from Simon Dach:
I wasn’t shouting, you did in the title. Here is the link: Go to Elbląg page, hit Talk. Now go to the lowest yellow box and click “Show”. Look at the fifth verse. Simon Dach lived in a country under Polish suzerainty, which took 200 years. I’m including the Teutonic period. That’s shared history for me. And Poles lived there too, they kept the language till 1945. You writers are very important, but so are we – the proof readers. Sincerely Atabir (talk) 16:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Always ready to help.
Atabir (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Glatisant! Sorry I left you hanging, but there’s my yesterday’s message for you on the Simon Dach Talk page.
Happy editing,
Atabir (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well, fair enough, for your point of view. But you just changed some things in the article, without motivation or discussion. It doesn't seem like working on a reliable and neutral encyclopedia, but just like activism. Glatisant (talk) 23:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wood engraving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Calvert. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

No problem, good to mention this. Glatisant (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antioch of Pisidia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Palaeologus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I improved the link. Thanks. Glatisant (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicomedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karaite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply