Gazzster

Care to meet me for a light luncheon at my sandbox? --Cameron

I made a minor correction (you seemed to have archived to the wrong page), hope you dont mind. --Cameron (t|p|c) 11:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS:When you cut and copy the contents over make sure you copy the text in 'edit this page mode' to make sure the headers appear the same and you don't have '[edit]' show up next to every subheading. --Cameron (t|p|c) 11:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

PPS:Sorry I forgot to tell you: Most users add {{talkarchive}} to the top and bottom of the archive page as it prevents people from editing it. I took the liberty of doing so on your page...feel free to rv if you dislike it...--Cameron (t|p|c) 11:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz. I'd change the April 08 to Jul 06-Apr 08, if I were you. GoodDay (talk) 18:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, probably a good idea. Unless one archives monthly as I do. --Cameron (t|p|c) 15:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS: Part four --Cameron (t|p|c) 15:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some people find her annoying! I personally love her! Look's like you have a lot of catching up to do = )...--Cameron (t|p|c) 13:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz, how are you? Where are you? GoodDay (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just the same old stuff. Discussions at British Isles, United Kingdom, Scotland, England, Northern Ireland & Wales. -- GoodDay (talk) 13:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

• The Doctor's Daughter

Woah, this one is worth watching just for Georgia Moffett! --Cameron (t|p|c) 10:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Silence in the library another genius episode by the man who's soon to take over. --Cameron (T|C) 17:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Surely an episode with Kylie Minogue would have to be the best episode ever? You've got to love her. = ) --Cameron* 14:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz. First, User:Barryrob at Scotland suggests I'm bordering trolling; then User:Matt Lewis suggests I'm 'not helping things' at British Isles discussion. Looks like I'm not gonna win any beauty contests at either of those articles, am I? giggle giggle. GoodDay (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

hey that's actually a really good idea! Wikipedia beauty contests! --Cameron (T|C) 14:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for sticking up for me Gazz. GoodDay (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for asking! = ) I'm doing pretty well so far (except maths!!). I suppose you're too old to be revising for exams also? How is life in oz?--Cameron (T|C) 14:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

So you're not in you're fourties! = ) Psychology is great fun but a lot of work. I still am considering it for next year. --Cameron (T|C) 14:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

= ) you sounded very British then! --Cameron (T|C) 14:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you seen the new WikiProject? If you are having trouble adding yourself (you wouldn't be the first), just leave me a note telling me your related interests/specialist areas and I will do it on your behalf. Regards, --Cameron (T|C) 14:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS:Where's TharkunColl? He seems to have vanished! = ( --Cameron (T|C) 14:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just curious; who would you like to see in that office (as your 1st President). GoodDay (talk) 22:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd pick Whitlam aswell, with a slogan: Remember '75. GoodDay (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

No prob; Cameron corrected my grammar - therefore you were probably going by the article's contributions list (which of course, list him after me; thus the confusion). GoodDay (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I still don't get it. Would you clarify? --Cameron* 18:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks. = ) --Cameron* 20:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree that shutting down a thread is an exceptional move. But I think it's justified here. It's becoming a medium for discussing the topic at hand, and not how to included the subject in the article. It's a judgment call, but I think the problem is chronic enough (especially now) that some sort of action be taken to discourage this. --soulscanner (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you in most of your points. However, I'll point out that this is the Quebec page which is of more importance than most other articles. Also, I'm sure that the administrator is aware of the other forum-like rantings in the past, and that this figures strongly in the decision to shut down the discussion this time. You'll also notice on Nat's discussion page that someone did request the shut down. In any case, I think wiki is well served to have this particular string archived. --soulscanner (talk) 16:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you believe the discussion continues on that topic? The latest article of note? River Shannon. Perhaps the proposed task-force will help things along. GoodDay (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Get this. 1] My prime minister (who has a Minority Government) wants to have a federal election, despite the Fixed Elections Act (which he & his party made into law) - on grounds that the 39th Parliament is disfunctional (due to the opposition's lack of cooperation). 2] The opposition (the other parties) don't want a Federal Election (at least not yet). 3] and the Official Opposition (if it joined with the others) could force an Election by bringing the Government (a Government which it despises) down, but refuses to do so (mainly cause they're afraid at this time, they'll get badly beaten at the Ballot). Government wants out, opposition wants to keep them in: Governor General, the stage is yours. GoodDay (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

He won't resign his Government - just want's to dissolve Parliament. Imagine if the Governor General refuses to dissolve Parliament? Or asks the opposition parties to form a coalation government (though I highly doubt it). GoodDay (talk) 21:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

He's going to (any day now) this week, according to the other party leaders. GoodDay (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 14, 2008. Let the campaign for the 40th Canadian Parliament commence. GoodDay (talk) 00:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS- I was hoping that the Governor General would refuse to dissolve Parliament; something unexpected & exciting. They're just aren't any Byng's or Kerr's anymore. GoodDay (talk) 16:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz. Holy smokers, G2bambino is retiring, so is Matt Lewis. At this rate, I'll be the oldest (tenure wise) registered editor (if not the oldest editor) on Wikipedia. May have to change my name to GreyDay. GoodDay (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hiya Gazz. Perhaps (someday) the articles Commonwealth realm & Commonwealth republic will have to be merged as a sorta sister article to Commonwealth of Nations. -- GoodDay (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've always found the Commonwealth of Nations, politically confusing. Yet, it works. GoodDay (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but what does it do? It doesn't do anything. Its not even like the UN- it has no coercive power.--Gazzster (talk) 02:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Guess that's why it works; it doesn't do anything (except hold Commonwealth Games). GoodDay (talk) 23:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

You've a point their at Commonwealth realm. Things are starting to become like: my version is better then your version stuff. -- GoodDay (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a post on WP:AN that you may or may not wish to comment on. Prince of Canada ^{t | c} 07:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gazz, did I sense a hint of irritation in your tone at Talk:Commonwealth realm? I hope nothing there is upsetting you. --G2bambino (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is currently an open Request for Comment on User Conduct here, regarding G2bambino. As someone with past interactions with him, you are invited to comment. — [ roux ] [x] 15:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A Request for comment/User conduct has been initated here regarding User:Roux (formerly User:PrinceOfCanada). As someone wish past interactions with this user, you are invited to comment. --G2bambino (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz, how ya doing. GoodDay (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okie Dokie, just keeping in contact. GoodDay (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nixeagle wasn't considering it. Just the same, I'm glad I wasn't. GoodDay (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, G2 got blocked concerning the Template:British Royal Family article. GoodDay (talk) 22:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

G2 & Roux are resigning from Wikipedia. I wish editors would follow your suggestion of not taking this place too seriously. GoodDay (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Earlier then expected, but I'm back. GoodDay (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I still favour deleting de jure reigns. GoodDay (talk) 23:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hiya Gazz. Do you have any smelling salts for me? The opposition parties are threatening to topple the Harper Government (over the economy). GoodDay (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS- Have ya noticed, my country's Finance Minister looks like Lou Costello. -- GoodDay (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

There's an article on the topic (it was created 'bout a fews days ago). I wouldn't call it a Constitional crises (as nothing unconstitutional occured). IMHO, the Governor General did the correct thing (at Harper's request) suspending Parliament until Jan 26, 2009. I'd be flabergasted, if the Liberals & NDP can keep things togehter 'til then (while mainetaining the BQ's support). The potential big showdown will be January 27th, 2009. If the Libs, NDP & BQ defeat the Conservaitve minority government on their Budget bill (and they still can present a coalition), the GG will have 2 options: Dissolve the 40th Parliament & call an election (at Harper's request) or appoint a Liberal-NDP coaliton government propped by the BQ (at Dion?, Layton request). GoodDay (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you are interesting in restating your opinion for [Monarchies in Europe] you may like to do so on [User:Monarchies in Europe]. Thanks --Lawe (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gazz, haven't seen ya around the Wiki, lately. GoodDay (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

There's continued discussions at List of French monarchs & List of English monarchs, as to who belongs & who doesn't. Also, the Ireland naming discussions, continue at Wikipedia: WikiProject Ireland Collaboration. -- GoodDay (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Howdy Gazz. There's also is/was a discussion concerning the Template: English and British monarchs. -- GoodDay (talk) 13:34, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's been a long time. GoodDay (talk) 16:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've been well. GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})Reply

 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Monarchies of Outer Space, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi.

Please have a look (as an editor who seems interested in the article) at Monarchy of Canada, where there is currently some disagreement about wording in the lead. Thanks. -- 205.250.72.215 (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yet, it's now happend in all three realms con-currently (Canada, United Kingdom & Australia). Welcome to the club, again. GoodDay (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gazzster. It's been agreed here that something regarding Charlemagne can be mentioned. See the latest posts of the conversation. I leave the editing to you. --ChristianHistory (talk) 13:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me for ambushing graciously, but could you detail if the article John V, Duke of Brittany, there is a gravestone on the bottom, is it actually the technique gravestone of Joanna of Flanders. The gravestone says Jeanne de Bretagne, please info ASAP conspiracy theory?...--74.34.68.22 (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

This section is just your way to get a dig in at wikipedians you don't like. Half the charachters are listed as brainless, spinless idiots. Improve this before you label it as a Philosophy. What a disgrace to True philosphy, and good user pages.--Questions99 (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Question99, thank you for your interest in my user page. If it offends you, you don't actually have to read it. Obviously it's a light-hearted observation, with enough truth in it to be recognisable to people who saw the humour and laughed at it. Gazzster (talk) 12:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gazzster - From my interpretation of your comments at Talk:Commonwealth realm, you disagree with User:Japinderum's stance that the Realm of New Zealand is a Commonwealth realm. Yet, you seemed to approve of his proposal to list the Realm of New Zealand as a Commonwealth realm. Could you please clarify your posititon? Japinderum is using your comments to justify his change to the table of Commonwealth realms.

BTW, I missed your earlier "hello" at that talk page. So, sorry, hello, and I'm doing relatively fine! --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

No worries, Mies! Yes, this 'Real of New Zealand' thing is weird!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply