GLG GLG
Hi, please don't delete the page, we are trying to get it set up and are new at this.
|
Hello, GLG GLG, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
|
|
|
Congratulations, GLG GLG! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
Hi GLG GLG,
Can you please guide me what i need to improve.
Please guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by President DEF (talk • contribs) 05:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Link is not a copy right
editHi,
the below mentioned link - http://bhubaneswar.darshanacademy.org/aboutus.aspx is my website only. which is subdomain of offical website mentioned - darshanacademy.org
Please guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by President DEF (talk • contribs) 05:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- @President DEF: You are copying and pasting articles from another website. You say it is your website - are you affiliated with the school? If you are the general rule is you're not supposed to start articles on a non-arms length entity. There is also a process you need to go through to inform wikipedia of that there is consent to use the content GLG GLG (talk) 05:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined
editI declined your speedy deletion of Promoted (Film) as an A10- Promoted is about sports leagues, and Promoted (Film) is about a film, they aren't about the same thing, so A10 does not apply. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Joseph2302 that's really weird. The promoted you linked to go to a re-direct for promotion and relegation. but yesterday when i looked at it there were two pages about the same movie. one under promoted (film) and the under promoted. i don't know what happened. GLG GLG (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the Promoted revision history, they had converted the Promoted redirect into an article about the film, which was reverted. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Joseph2302 oh, ok. in any event i must have tagged the article for deletion before that. b/c when i did it i certainly wasn't suggesting that the article on promotion and relegation be deleted or that it and the film article were the same. GLG GLG (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the Promoted revision history, they had converted the Promoted redirect into an article about the film, which was reverted. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Joseph2302 that's really weird. The promoted you linked to go to a re-direct for promotion and relegation. but yesterday when i looked at it there were two pages about the same movie. one under promoted (film) and the under promoted. i don't know what happened. GLG GLG (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Re:San Giacomo Scossacavalli
editHallo GLG GLG, thanks! I am really glad that someone already read it. Now I only hope that someone will copyedit it, since my english is washed in Tiber's water. :-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Alex2006 it looks like you're still working on the article. If you want, when you're done, I can copy edit it some more. I made some minor changes already. There were some things about it the language/phrasing that I thought about changing but didn't want to seem impolite. I don't mind going through it more when you're done, as long as that's okay with you. GLG GLG (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! the article is more or less ok now. If in the next days you will have time and lust :-) your copyediting will be most welcome (and if in doing it, some factual imprecisions will be introduced, I can always correct it: that's how wikipedia works :-))! Thanks Alex2006 (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Alex2006 it looks like you're still working on the article. If you want, when you're done, I can copy edit it some more. I made some minor changes already. There were some things about it the language/phrasing that I thought about changing but didn't want to seem impolite. I don't mind going through it more when you're done, as long as that's okay with you. GLG GLG (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 12 August
edit Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of current NHL captains and alternate captains page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Montreal Canadians
editHi, Why did you have revert my edit on the Montreal Canadians? Newsy Lalonde has 266 goals, 62 assists and 328 pts for the Habs. Explain that to me please. Thanks. --Danielvis08 (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Danielvis08 I already restored it. GLG GLG (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
editHi GLG GLG,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, GLG GLG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, GLG GLG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, GLG GLG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)