BrookTheHumming

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmy Clarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mpen320 (talk) 03:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Jiminy Cricket in animation has been nominated for merging with Template:Disney's Pinocchio. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please don't add production companies without citing a reliable source, as you did in this edit. Like other content on Wikipedia, this needs to be properly sourced. In many cases, editors guess at these companies based on the logos they see on promotional material. Some of these companies could very well be production companies, but others are likely to be investors, rights holders, etc. Sometimes editors also want to "give credit where it's due" on their own initiative. This includes animation companies or other services that no reliable sources identify as production companies. This is why we let sources decide who the production companies are. If everyone just added whoever they thought should belong in the infobox, it would become bloated with a bunch of entries that are not actually production companies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If it is for my edition in A Very Merry Pooh Year, I have added the company again, this time with a reference that was already in the article. I don't know if that reference will be acceptable. - BrookTheHumming (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

As far as I can tell, the phrase "Disney Animation France" does not appear on page 340 of that book. Can you quote the sentence where it appears? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I strongly suggest that you respond to me. If you're adding hoax citations, this will need to be cleaned up. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

As I said, I only used a reference that was already in the article. If it is incorrect, then it should be removed from the page. BrookTheHumming (talk) 09:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you refusing to quote the line from the source that says this? Did you add a hoax citation? Do not ignore this question. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have already resolved it, and I have changed the studio to Walt Disney Television Animation. My fault, since, as I said, I did not place that reference in the article, but when I saw it next to the name of that studio I assumed that it was a reference that stated that it was involved in the production.- BrookTheHumming (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Disney company that owns the villains only consider 11 of them as primary members I don't know why but it's not 13 that was just a game in the merchandise. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I guess the reason there's 11 because of Chernabog because he's from Fantasia and it wasn't a regular Disney film it was an anthology film. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

But it only has 11 on Disney wiki CourageousMarie (talk) 00:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Check in with the Disney Company and look up Disney Villains on Disney wiki on fandom. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, BrookTheHumming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two Chips and a Miss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, BrookTheHumming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dangerverse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you not know 13 Reflections of Evil was sub-franchise from 10 years ago they don't count all of them as primary members ask the Company and franchise. BelBott (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fine I don't really care for Disney villains any I was trying to make things make sense. BelBott (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

What I really is to explain that Ghostface is not one of the most recognizable horror characters cause he's not a character he's an identity. BelBott (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

FYI the accounts you have recently been reverting at List of Disney villain characters are sockpuppets of a long term vandal. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer. You can just report these to WP:AIV when you notice them, with a brief explanation and a link to the SPI case. MrOllie (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I know, I know. A few days ago the user was with the same topic of "Disney villains", also editing about slasher films... Too much of a coincidence if they were two different people. If in the future this user does these editing wars again with another account, I will follow your advice to report it. - BrookTheHumming (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wonderful Wizard of Quads. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury • 23:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The same to you. You are the one who constantly deletes content that others add. BrookTheHumming (talk) 23:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mayonnaise, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pirate films and television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Mitchell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply