BillyJack193

 

I have nominated John Mellencamp's 21st studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mellencamp's 21st studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan2 (talk) 02:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:American Bandstand 1200 resize.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Hillbilly Singer 1200 resize.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:TheWarHustle resize.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

And I have responded to your reasons on the talk page. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  You have violated the three-revert rule on Toby Keith. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

• Hey, no hard feelings over this issue. You made a pretty sound, reasoned case for your POV. I respect that. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see that you passed "Open Your Heart" to good article, but you didn't gave any feedback to improve it, I see some problems with it, you have to be sure that the article meets all of the Wikipedia:Good article criteria. Also the "Jack and Diane" article is clearly not up to good article standars, I suggest you withdraw the nomination before it get a quick fail. Frcm1988 (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted your passing of "Open Your Heart". Please familiarize with GA criterias as stated above, then you can review. I will be waiting for someone experienced to come through for reviewing. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Billyjack8.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please stop removing image maintenance tags without fixing the problem they indicate. You need to write a rationale for each use of this image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:The Delinquents.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:The Delinquents.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Billyjack8.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Again, please stop removing maintenance templates from images. The template contains instructions to follow if you disagree with the concern. (ESkog)^(Talk) 11:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, he certainly does belong in WP:WPBIOA&E. Even if he was elected President or cured cancer or became a pro-golfer, he'd still belong there as he's an accomplished actor. You have improved the article a bit, but you'll have to wait for a more comprehensive review when somebody picks it up at WP:GAN. I have re-added {{cleanup-link rot}}, though, because most of the citations aren't formatted at all and are just bare URLs. See WP:CITE#HOW for a guide to format the references. Hope that helps, —97198 (talk) 06:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Good luck with the article! LilHelpa (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi BillyJack193,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

• Each casebook will have a subpage.

• Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
• It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
• Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.

• I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.

2. If you're a law student,

• Email http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
• Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.

(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)

3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 04:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion here. Thanks.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Marxist taskforce for the Philosophy project into the socialist project... Or becoming a taskforce for the socialist project.. It does seem more convenient... Right? --TIAYN (talk) 07:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

See WP:EL, also note that it is part of a larger spamming campaign by an editor who has added that (and other democracy now) links across many many pages (apparently 87 places). Prodego ^talk 05:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sure - I'd be a bit concerns about if it truly represents the type of resource we want to link to, but in any case I don't mean to make a statement about if it should be included in any particular article. Prodego ^talk 18:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is not necessary to include him if you feel he doesn't properly belong. If you wish to include him with a notation, I would do it as:

John Cougar (former akas: Johnny Cougar and John Cougar Mellencamp) — John Mellencamp (abandoned aliases in 1989)

Actually I just checked and it was done some time ago by another editor (:John Cougar — "Stage name Johnny Cougar given to him by his manager in 1975; changed to John Cougar in 1979. Mellencamp has not used this name since 1982 and has not used the name John Cougar Mellencamp since 1989.") Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article List of albums released in 2010, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 03:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please see here:

• Wikipedia:ALBUM#Professional_reviews
• Wikipedia:ALBUM#Reception
• WP:3RR
• Wikipedia:Edit warring

Because you are either unfamiliar with some of these policies and guidelines or you are deliberately choosing to ignore them. If you continue reverting on this page, I will report you to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR. You have not posted anything on talk that shows that you have read or understood any of these articles I have linked above and until you do I can only assume that you are being deliberately ignorant of editing policy. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

See the talk page. As I said there, it was a mistake on my part.BillyJack193 (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Mellencamp, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Airplaneman ^talk 02:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

It was an alternate name that he used in an official capacity to produce albums. It is not vandalism and was there for months until being reverted by another user. I simply undid their changes.BillyJack193 (talk) 02:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, BillyJack193. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 02:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Airplaneman ^talk 02:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is a discussion going on at the talk page to WikiProject Philosophy on merging the Marxist taskforce into the Socialist project. Seeing that you are a member, are you against such a merger, if so why? --TIAYN (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Tom Laughlin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Tom Laughlin for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Hillbilly Singer 1200 resize.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 207.69.139.155 (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hillbilly Singer 1200 resize.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 00:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I see that you have reverted my removal of the professional reviews from the infobox of the On the Rural Route 7609 article. As there was no adequate explanation for your revert in the edit summary, I have removed the reviews again. Links to professional reviews are no longer allowed in album infoboxes, as per Wikipedia:ALBUM#Professional_reviews and Wikipedia:Albums#Reception. You can relocate professional reviews to a dedicated "Reception" section using the {{Album ratings}} template, but links to reviews should only be used to compliment prose in the "Reception" section, not be used as a substitute for it. Since the article has no dedicated "Release" or "Reception" section, the reviews should be deleted...unless someone wants to compose a few paragraphs describing the album's critical reception in detail, in which case, the reviews can then be retained using the aforementioned template. If you are a user that contributes regularly to John Mellencamp album articles, perhaps you might consider removing or relocating the professional reviews in other articles too? Consensus was reached in December 2009 to do away with reviews in the infoboxes of album articles - the relevant discussion can be found here. Many thanks. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply. OK, well that's fair enough if you want to keep the reviews, especially if you plan to expand the relevant section in the not too distant future...just create a Reception section (or a section with a similar title) and relocate the reviews to it using the {{Album ratings}} template. You can also add the {{Arprose}} template to tag the section for later expansion, as has been done in the Back in Black article for example. The tag will also act as a reminder to you and may encourage other editors to expand the section too. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, BillyJack193! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:WakeUP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, It was recently suggested that WikiProject United States History might be inactive or semiactive and that it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States.

I have started a discussion and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --Kumioko (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Shooter-BlackRibbons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:61o5KXOMtUL. SL500 SS75 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:TomPetty-Mojo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Save some time to dream 640.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Altered Walter (talk) 05:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I draw your attention to WP:BRD. If an edit you make is reverted, discuss it on the article talk page, where this has been discussed previously, rather than edit war. Barsoomian (talk) 05:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi BillyJack193,

I saw your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Discrimination#Participants listing.

There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Citizenship suggesting a change of emphasis to a Citizenship entry from the Nationality entry.

The idea is to give more facilitation to Patriotism instead of Nationalism and also to allow more freedom of expression in regards to terminologies used.

Contributions are welcomed but may be worth checking last edit to check progress first :) Regards Gregkaye (talk) 20:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of awards and nominations received by Stephen King

added links pointing to The Shining, The Dead Zone, Rose Madder, Firestarter, Spokane Public Library and Under the Dome

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Director's Chair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historical fiction by time period, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexander Kent and Exodus (novel). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cocaine & Rhinestones, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hank Thompson and Matlock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

Hi BillyJack193,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply