Axelcabrera100

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Please specifically note that you may not draft article content on your userpage. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed your new article, Estadisticas coronavirus espana. This is the English wikipedia, please move your article to a title in English, thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 00:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Estadisticas coronavirus espana. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Spain. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Spain. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FOX 52 (talk) 00:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week certain areas of the encyclopedia for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 02:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Template:COVID-19 vaccination data, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Hi! I'm not sure exactly why you keep returning the flags to this template as you haven't left an.WP:edit summary. You may be wise to do this in future. The WP:MOS for flags means that we should use flags to explain items, not be purely decorative as they are in this case. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi bro you know like me that hundreds of pages and templates have countries flags. I know that you want to do write but you are very concius that hundreds of pages have countries flags mostly for tables. The template have been with flags since the very creation beggining January could you leave the page with flags please? the gif i understand Thank you very much.  Axelcabrera100 (talk 21:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Consistency or something being around for some time is irrelevant. Plus your personal attacks on the talk page do not make me feel that you are contributing to Wikipedia in a constructive way. This is a collaborative project, and we have standards for what things should and shouldn't be included in articles. As I've already said, flags being used decoratively in other articles makes no difference to how it should be handled in another. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Lee Vilenski: Hi bro I only wanted to ask you if we can have the page with the flags in your talk page never wanted to be in other intention as the article you quote it says also These "other stuff exists" arguments can be valid or invalid.So I will never put a gif in a template but could we please remain with the flags no other user complains it about that besides in some cases it makes the table clearly. Than you very much.  Axelcabrera100 (talk 21:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  PLEASE STOP disruptive editing and adding unnecessary galleries as you did at Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force page. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article of the subject over and over. :See: WP:IMAGEMOS for additional information. Further do not engaged in an edit warring as you will be blocked from editing, again. - FOX 52 ^talk! 02:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at China. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. intforce (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and violating the non-free content policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply