AtticTapestry

Thanks for creating St Augustine's Church, Brookland, AtticTapestry!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting looking building, nice article.

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello AtticTapestry,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ignatius de Orellana for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|UPage|_☺★ (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just a note to say thanks for your good work on this article. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm looking forward to seeing your article on Robertson's play Caste. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bitter Sweet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Laye]] had been the first choice to play Sarah, but turned it down as she was annoyed with the pro]ducer, [[C. B. Cochran]], who she felt had caused her marriage to actor Sonnie Hale to fail by

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I like your article about the quartet playing Beethoven and suggested it for the Did you know section of the Main page, DYK? Template:Did you know nominations/Schuppanzigh Quartet, feel free to join the discussion - or not, whatever you prefer ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

On 17 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schuppanzigh Quartet, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that violinst Ignaz Schuppanzigh founded the Schuppanzigh Quartet, which played the premieres of several string quartets by Ludwig van Beethoven? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Schuppanzigh Quartet. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC) 00:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the Beethoven expansion. Here's a trio that I wrote, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

colourful music
Thank you, violinist who likes spring and autumn, for creating quality articles such as Schuppanzigh Quartet and William Ellis (missionary in Newfoundland), for contributing to others such as a Beethoven piano trio and The Wind from Nowhere, and for a delightful user page telling us this, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were the 868th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize forgot to sign

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 868 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm JacobiJonesJr. AtticTapestry, thanks for creating Black August (novel)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Placing review sources for the book would be helpful to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I placed this as a DYK at the Portal:San Francisco Bay Area, which i have revived. i also found a public domain cover for the book. thanks for actually writing these articles. my work lately is not so much writing articles as organizing the bay area articles.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please send permission for release under a CC BY SA license to permissions-en@wikimedia.org per WP:CONSENT. Be careful. Public domain sources and CC-BY-SA-compatible sources may be closely paraphrased,not copy and pasted. Attribution is always required.--Lucas559 (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Richard Usher, AtticTapestry!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Added his obituary which is on Google Books and was probably the source for a lot of the information on him in other sources. Looks great

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating William Henry Longhurst, AtticTapestry!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Added some extra citations - hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

On 15 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard Langdon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 18th-century organist Richard Langdon held the positions of master of the choristers and organist at Exeter Cathedral, positions that had not been combined for over 100 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Langdon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Andrew Lawrence (engraver), AtticTapestry!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks really interesting. One question - where did the date of birth being 1710 come from and is that definitely the result of modern research? The DNOB on Wikisource says 1708...

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

• Fair enough. Wonder how they know that and what they're basing it on. I thought given the dispute I'd put an efn explaining this, but it's your article - feel free to remove it if you prefer. Blythwood (talk) 19:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for your edit to Yehudi Menuhin. However, it covered up some vandalism that had been done in the previous edit. If you see a situation like that in a fairly high-profile article like that one, it's a good idea to check the page history first and try to revert or undo the offending edit. Graham87 06:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I've been very cheeky, and copied your very recent work on the above article - or at least a rather truncated version of the same - into the not-terribly-happy list/article Promontory forts of Cornwall. I just thought it right to acknowledge what you've done. Haploidavey (talk) 11:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

[[

File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

A tag has been placed on John Devonshire Ellis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I removed it. The assertion of notability is obvious.--Savonneux (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi AtticTapestry, I've just had the pleasure of reading your last half a dozen articles and was surprised to see that someone who has been editing here for as long as you wasn't an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of fixing that. Take care and happy editing. ϢereSpielChequers 17:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Georg Jacob Vollweiler, AtticTapestry!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article, but why was he noted as a teacher? Are there any portraits or lithographs of him?

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for the clarification. I was looking for that but I couldn't find it. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Nicholas' Church, Rochester, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rochester and Oratory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoffman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Hoffman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.64% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities this month: WiR Loves Pride Singers and Songwriters Women in GLAM Geofocus: Russia/USSR #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Day (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfred Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You're doing a grand job on adding photos. There are still hundreds of grade II entries to add to the list - I got dispirited about it sometime ago - but you may have re-juvinated me about it. Nthep (talk) 11:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Philharmonic Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Wilde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I added your house to Norfolk. If you've created or plan to create more please add them to the list! Keep up the great work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge would welcome your articles BTW, it's good to see a range of articles coming in.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm running this this month. Feel free to participate, all entries done will feed into the challenge at the end of the month.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Thom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Articles may be submitted for this as well as the regional Challenge you usually contribute to at the same time. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

On 4 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Heinrich Schütz House, Bad Köstritz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Heinrich Schütz House (pictured) in Bad Köstritz, the inn where composer Heinrich Schütz was born, is now a museum and concert venue? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Heinrich Schütz House, Bad Köstritz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, also for beginning the Mendelssohn House! Could you add just a bit more there, for another DYK? Is there another Mendelssohn House, or could we drop Leipzig in the title? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ringmoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bell Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loynton Moss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Last ice age.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Winterborne Farringdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dorchester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Are you intending on creating all the missing parishes in Staffordshire? I have started Draft:Stone Rural. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Here are more of her roles. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, AtticTapestry, and thanks for all the interesting articles you've created on musicians, actors, writers and historical sites. I was particularly interested to see how many biographies of women you have recently created. In this connection, you might find it useful to become a member of wp:Women in Red where we are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. Given your wide experience of editing, you could no doubt assist new contributors and help us in our efforts to improve the project and set future priorities. But whether or not you join, I hope you'll continue writing about women in 2022. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comment. Do you have any idea how this should be described on the image? Lotje (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The photograph c:File:Remains of Cefn Caer Euni - geograph.org.uk - 339132.jpg, with its description, comes from the Geograph website. I think the title and description is all right: the name of the stone circle, "Cefn Caer Euni" means (from my limited knowledge of Welsh) "the back of Caer Euni": it is next to the hillfort. AtticTapestry (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

hi how are you @AtticTapestry , can you take a look here and review this article and if it is ok can you move it to main space thanks a lot عمر بن عبدالعزيز الزهراني (talk) 06:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@عمر بن عبدالعزيز الزهراني Thank you for the message. The article is well written and (without checking the sources) seems very well referenced, and it is likely to be approved. I don't usually review articles by other editors. I've noticed that you have sent the same message to a few others: see what they think. AtticTapestry (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ah ok As you like can you create the article from sctratsh عمر بن عبدالعزيز الزهراني (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This account has been blocked as a sock of a very prolific self-promoter. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy New Year

2024

Same location pictured as 2019. - Thank you for a new article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Yesterday was a friend's birthday, with related music. - I'm on vacation - see places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I note that you have deleted the category 'Victorian Turkish baths' from the Mounts baths. I expect you have not yet had time to read the revised article on Victorian Turkish baths as it was only uploaded late yesterday evening. The article is about the Victorian Turkish bath as a type of hot-air bath, not as a bath limited strictly to the period of Queen Victoria's reign. In fact the third short paragraph of the initial summary states,

'Hot-air baths of the same type, built after Queen Victoria’s reign, are known as Victorian-style Turkish baths.

So I hope you won't mind too much if I replace the category, and wait a little while to see if there are objections from the baths, or from other editors. If you look at the list of baths still open (which clearly indicates which baths are Victorian and which are Victorian-type) you will find that Mounts Baths have been happily included on this page for nearly 25 years without any protest! Ishpoloni (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, replace the category, it seems to be suitable. AtticTapestry (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I had to correct the coordinates in List of public art in Suffolk, per WP:OPCOORD (and because some missed the artworks by more than a few meters). Normally I don't pester editors on their talk pages, but I must ask; what purpose does the column of Wikidata Items serve? Wikidata is not meant to be seen out in the open, as it were, on Wikipedia. And the table is far too wide. Abductive (reasoning) 10:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for improving the accuracy of the coordinates in the list. I created the list to be like existing lists in Template:Public art in the United Kingdom. I was assuming that the templates for setting up these lists were created by, and used by, editors wiser than me. I am aware that Wikidata item numbers are not often seen in Wikipedia, but perhaps some worthwhile extra information can be found there by viewers. AtticTapestry (talk) 07:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The average reader has no idea what Wikidata is. Perhaps there needs to be a WP:Requests for comment, which I am sure would find putting Wikidata Items into articles extremely problematic. For the time being, I suggest removing such columns for your tables, and, if you feel up to it, the other places you have observed them. Abductive (reasoning) 07:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I removed the wikidata column from the Suffolk list and three other lists, since, although I am not greatly worried about the matter, I agree that to show wikidata numbers is a little odd. These edits for two of them, List of public art in Devon and List of public art in Buckinghamshire, have been reversed by another editor. So there seems to be scope for further discussion about this. AtticTapestry (talk) 13:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply