User talk:Asturkian/Archive 2018

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fundación Lucentum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Xuventude Baloncesto logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hola, he contado los hat-tricks por club y hay 1082. Falta el Getafe (4). Pero 1082 + 4 no dan 1084 (sobran dos para que cuadren los 1086). Un saludo! --Zigurat (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ya sé a que se debe el desfase. Añado el Getafe. Un saludo. --Zigurat (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Por qué al añadir la tabla por equipos no salen las plantillas ni las referencia? --Zigurat (talk) 09:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:BC Grand Sport.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

What a player and (apparently) what a human being was Quini! I suppose as a Spaniard and a Sporting fan you also know the story of his brother, a hero indeed!

Continue the good work, saludos desde Portugal --Quite A Character (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, this is not anything relating to Wikipedia editing, but I know you have an interest in Spanish youth football and would have more local knowldge than me, so I wanted to ask about Atlético Madrileño. I'm a bit confused about why the team exists? I have tried looking it up on Google etc but as you will know, that was also the name of Atlético B for many years so a lot of the results come back to them. From what I could gather, Atlético Madrileño was an unofficial youth team that represented the club when Jesús Gil stopped the official cantera, and then when the system was restarted, the Atlético Madrileño setup was allowed to continue alongside the official teams? Not sure if I have got that right. Also seems that the Madrileño Juv A team are officially connected to Atlético de Madrid (as per official website) but no other age groups, so do they operate as a separate club below that?

Seems a bit weird to me that Atlético are the only club which can have two teams in the Division de Honor and that they are allowed to operate in two different leagues with the possibility of winning them both, as has happened this season. What will happen if Atléti Juv A is drawn against Atlético Madrileño in the end of year competitions? Or will they be kept apart to try and make sure it doesn't happen?

Thanks for any info you can tell me regarding this. If you are aware of any references (Spanish would be fine, very unlilely to be any in English) which explain the situation, please either point me to it or add it to the Atlético Madrid (youth) article to explain to anyone else who may be wondering about this unusual sitation – at present, Atlético Madrileño linnks back there but there is no team list or other info for them, I'm not saying that is incorrect but it would be good to add something about them on the article if we can. As I stated above, I tried to look myself but most of it just had recent results etc without explaining about the origins of the team, or related to old stuff about Atlético B.

All the best, Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018

Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014 Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative. WOSO Initiatives   Australia:W-League England: WSL France: Div 1 Germany: Bundesliga Ireland: WNL Italy: Serie A Mexico: Liga MX Femenil Nigeria Spain: La Liga Femenina Sweden: Damallsvenskan United States: NCAA Requested Articles v t e Did you know ... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}} Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Czech Republic: 2017–18 Czech First Division ends Apr England: 2017–18 FA WSL ends May 20 Faroe Islands: 2018 1. deild kvinnur started Mar 11 France: 2017–18 Division 1 Féminine ends May 27 Germany: 2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga ends Jun 2 Iceland: 2018 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) starts May 3 Ireland: 2018 Women's National League started Mar 11 Israel: 2017–18 Ligat Nashim ends Apr 28 Italy: 2017–18 Serie A ends May 12 Japan: 2018 Nadeshiko started Mar 21 Mexico: 2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season ends May 5 Moldova: 2017–18 Moldovan Women Top League started Apr 1 Netherlands: 2017–18 Eredivisie ends May 25 Scotland: 2018 Scottish Women's Premier League started Feb 11 South Korea: 2018 WK League starts Apr 23 Spain: 2017–18 Primera División ends May 13 Sweden: 2018 Damallsvenskan started Apr 14 United States: 2018 National Women's Soccer League season started Mar 24 Current season articles needing creation Albania: 2017–18 Kampionati Femrave started in Oct Algeria: 2017–18 Algerian Women's Championship started in Sept Austria: 2017–18 ÖFB-Frauenliga started in Aug Belgium: 2017–18 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal (nl) started in Sept China: 2018 Chinese Women's Super League season started in Apr Cyprus: 2017–18 Cypriot First Division started in Nov Finland: 2018 Naisten Liiga started Mar 24 Northern Ireland: 2018 Women's Premiership starts Apr 18 Norway: 2018 Toppserien started Mar 24 Portugal: 2018 Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino (pt) ends May 19 Romania: 2017–18 Romanian Superliga ends Jun 2 Switzerland: 2018 Nationalliga A ends May 26 Vietnam: 2018 Vietnam Women's Football Championship started Mar 10 Wales: 2017-18 Welsh Premier Women's Football League ends May 18 Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Reply

Hi, Asturkian. His case was similar to Iker Muniain's, which you helped me last season. Specifically, his yellow card against Celta in matchday 30 was apparently taken back, therefore he could appear against Betis today. Hopefully you can help me again. By the way, may Gijon promote this season :) Centaur271188 (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old Common Council of Castropol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Llanera and Pajares (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, while talking to Kante4, I recognise that we are using an unofficial source in La Liga template about classification. I would like to improve it by using an official link (specifically Articulo 201), but I need someone understands Spanish to explain it. Would you like to help me? Thanks :) Centaur271188 (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Buenas, Asturkian. Esa traducción la metió un usuario IP. Al principio a mí también me resultó extraña, pero buscando en Internet parece que ese es equivalente al inglés de lo que sería la Formación Profesional ([1]), por lo que su uso sería correcto. Un saludo y de nada. ;) Impru20^talk 11:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 FIBA European Championship for Small Countries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serravalle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:REDNOT, you should either create red-linked categories or not add them at all, eg when you create new season articles such as here. Cheers Le Deluge (talk) 09:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Largest cities of Asturias has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Divisiones Regionales de Fútbol in Asturias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Navia and Campomanes

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Do you have an official source confirming he signed for Benfica? Remember that WP:FUTURE doesn't count. SLBedit (talk) 17:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Problem is that "dirigirá" and "voy" constitute WP:FUTURE. SLBedit (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's probably safe to add him to the article then, but Benfica hasn't confirmed the transfer. SLBedit (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Segunda División B.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:CERH European League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:CERS Cup logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:CERH Continental Cup.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:CERH Female League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Segunda División B.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Asturkian. I see you moved Neptune Basketball Club to Neptune BC with the reasoning of "Name according to the rest of articles at this Wikipedia". Which "rest of articles" are you referring to may I ask? There should be consistency within the league i.e. if you are going to move Neptune Basketball Club to Neptune BC, then Killester Basketball Club should be moved to Killester BC. In saying that however, I disagree with your original move. I made sure a few years back that all the Irish basketball team/club articles were consistent. Teams that did not have distinguishing name features compared to their parent club or organisation (i.e. Neptune or Killester) did not have a team-based article, rather a club-based article. UCC Demons for example can be distinguished from Blue Demons Basketball Club, but Neptune's Super League team CandS Neptune can not be distinguished from Neptune Basketball Club without the sponsor name. The same goes for Killester, Killorglin, Maree, Moycullen and Templeogue. To conclude, I think either Killester, Moycullen and Templeogue should also be moved to "BC", or Neptune is moved back to Neptune Basketball Club. I'd like to hear your thoughts. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I came to your talk page for a similar reason to the above. Namely that I noted (and, put frankly, do not agree with) the page move. The rationale for the page move was (to paraphrase) "for consistency with other/similar articles". I am not sure what article-naming guideline this refers to, but, typically, the guideline which determines the title of an article is the WP:COMMONNAME guideline. "Neptune BC" is unequivocally *not* the common name of the subject. So, if we are referring to some other guideline (that supercedes the common-name guideline), then please advise what that is. Or, alternatively, please move the article back. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Buenas tardes, Asturkian. Pues en principio el propio CIS avala la existencia de cocinas distintas en base a sus datos brutos, por lo que, si bien no son estimaciones realizadas por la propia encuestadora (y, aunque en el medio se afirme, tampoco podemos asegurar que esa fuese la metodología antigua del CIS, puesto que el CIS hasta la fecha no ha hecho públicas sus metodologías), al ser realizadas por fuentes fiables y constituir en sí mismas estimaciones de sondeos de opinión, podrían ser consideradas (si bien citando al autor de la estimación, que no es el CIS en este caso sino el medio que lo publica). En el último año, diversos medios (destaca sobre todo El Español) han venido publicando sus propias cocinas en base a los datos del CIS, por lo que podrían añadirse también. Si bien mi duda (y ya con motivo del barómetro de abril surgió una polémica en este sentido con un usuario IP) vendría a ser qué fecha utilizar (si la fecha de realización del trabajo de campo del CIS, al ser los datos brutos del CIS; si la fecha de publicación de la nueva estimación; o bien una solución intermedia que sería la fecha de publicación del propio CIS, puesto que quienes han realizado la nueva cocina no han tenido acceso a los datos brutos del CIS, como mínimo, hasta esa fecha). Impru20^talk 13:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:FIMA Basketball.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Jaka Lakovič. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 ACB season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Néstor García (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey, great job there. Are you planing to do those for the Women's teams aswell? Kante4 (talk) 13:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not so good? Not sure what you mean by that. Kante4 (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ahh ok. Still, i think the World rankings are displayed and could be easily be covered in such a template. ;) Maaaybe they change the system aswell at some point. Kante4 (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Real Avilés logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply