Arthur Warrington Thomas

Can you make the link to your archive more descriptive? I use a screen reader, and therefore I only here "." when I navigate to that link. You can remove the top message on the page if you like as it was already archived. Thanks, Graham87 08:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dar-us-salam.com/authors/taqi-ud-din-hilali.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Of course, i'm always glad to help. Let's see what we can do to get references for notability all around, I think it's a good project in the making. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Saalih ibn Fawzaan ibn 'Abdullaah al-Fawzaan mentioned in the Memri article appears to be the one we have the article about, and I also found a somewhat official looking site for him here. The Muhammad al-Fawzaans in the other links, I don't know who they are, but they aren't the guy we have a wiki article about as the famous member of the Lajnah doesn't have "Muhammad" in his name. MezzoMezzo (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

After a nearly three week vacation, i'm back and ready to work. Any progress while I was gone? MezzoMezzo (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Georgina Bruni, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Bruni. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ScienceApologist (talk) 03:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I removed the flag from the East Turkestan article because it is not the flag of the East Turkestan geographical area, which doesn't have a flag, but of the East Turkestan independence movement. It is relevant to that article, but not to the East Turkestan article where it is only describing a geographical area. Regards, --Joowwww (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to give me (or Travellingcari, who originally deleted the page) a good reason for why you want to see it. As it was originally deleted as an attack page and a BLP violation, and you're the one who wrote it, I am skeptical about why you want to view it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 22:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, no dice. A new article will have to be just that - a new article, and will have to be reliably sourced, give an explanation for why it's notable, and not defamatory, if you hope it to be kept.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just left a lengthy message for you on this article's talk page. I also want to suggest that you read this carefully because I think this is the real problem with the article. By the way, you often seem not to sign you rmessages. This confuses others. Please sign by using the four tildes. Best, Slrubenstein | Talk 14:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Category:American Football Clubs in Wales (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:American football teams in Wales (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. the skomorokh 16:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andrea Haugen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré, 2008-11-02t11:20z 11:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Andrea Haugen, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Haugen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Jeandré, 2008-11-02t22:00z 22:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Georgina Bruni, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Bruni (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 07:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated You Can't Tell the People, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Can't Tell the People. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Glocke. dougweller (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Gordon E. Williams, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon E. Williams. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please address the concern I'v raised. Do you really want to give "unique historic photography" as a fair use rationale? --Pjacobi (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi -- would you please read WP:Layout and follow the style guidelines there? Also, you need to use more inline citations and less listing a load of stuff as sources. Plus, are you familiar with WP:RS, WP:Verify, and for good measure WP:EL? If you follow those policies and guidelines, your articles will be better and you will have less editors nagging you. :-) dougweller (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Arthur Warrington Thomas, I just wanted to inform you that I've copied your article "Gordon E. Williams" to Obscuropedia, an experimental new wiki for non-notable topics. You can see it and edit it here. Let me know if you have any questions. Dcoetzee 23:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Secret King, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

lack of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fayenatic (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure I agree with your reversions since most of the information in the section comes from blogs and speculative pieces. I originally reverted this because the user had been warned about referencing blogs previously and blogs are not a reliable source as anyone can make any claim they wish. I believe we should be looking at reliable sources for such a controversial section. I'm going to open a discussion on the talk page and I'll restore the text I deleted from there. Feel free to contribute to the discussion. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the text from the article again since I'm concerned about some of the references. However, I have opened a discussion on the talk page where you're welcome to make any comments you feel appropriate. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not quite sure how to proceed with this. Some of the information checks out but I'm concerned about the controversial nature of the topic and some of the references being from blog postings (though as I said before I'd hope the BBC would be accurate). In any case I've asked for some editor assistance as I don't have a lot of experience in editing controversial topics. See this discussion. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tony Gosling, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Un-notable, minor journalist (at least per article content).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Babakathy (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Friedrich Oskar Wannieck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable biography

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Backwoods (film) (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Backwoods already exists as a disambiguation page. 2nd link here goes there in fact.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Robin webb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 07:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

You need to add the appropriate copyright template to the picture - examples can be found at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free or (bigger list) Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Skier Dude (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Abd Al-Aziz Fawzan Al-Fawzan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I saw your comment on the talk page, contesting the deletion, so I have removed the prod notice. You could and should have removed it yourself if you didn't want the article deleted. It may still be sent to WP:Articles for deletion, so I would urge you to source the article now using reliable sources that will show his notability. Fences&Windows 01:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Mumia Abu-Jamal in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Arbitrary collection of information with no apparent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Chester Megabowl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to stablish notability here, and promotional in tone.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhullandemu 21:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

salaam bro just wondering are you a revert to islam?

are you a salafi brother?

would love to discuss and see what your about akhi, i noticed you discussing a few interesting topics but there is no pm system on here.

salaam bro just wondering are you a revert to islam?

are you a salafi brother?

would love to discuss and see what your about akhi, i noticed you discussing a few interesting topics but there is no pm system on here.

i completely agree with your point rgearding wikipedia being a point of first contact for people (and that not necessarily meaning that its the best place to look for info) and id like to state something similar on my page if you dont mind and id also like to borrow the islam flag if ok?

David.Baratheon (talk) 12:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 19:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jonathan Cook. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Cook. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:SyedHakeemAbyazQaradawi.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:SyedHakeemAbyazQaradawi.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Arthur Warrington Thomas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Ken Yokobosky - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Fred Borden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Cass Edwards - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Mike Mullin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Wim van der Veen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Nikki Harvey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Uberdruck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberdruck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Advanced Bowling: Techniques, Tips and Tactics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable instructional video - no indications of importance of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Stone circles in Shropshire , which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  An article that you have been involved in editing, The_Book_of_Blotar , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. GeezerBird (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andy Chung, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.andychung.co.uk/biography.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Andy Chung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Abdul Raheem Green has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a WP:Notable subject. Does not rely on any WP:Reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plot Spoiler (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Abdul Raheem Green, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Raheem Green. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Earthlingsdocumentary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Arthur

Please ignore if this is unwelcome but the WikiSpooks site could use many of your rejected edits/contributions here. Have a look around and see what you think. It's in it's infancy with competent wiki-text markup coupled with English language skills in short and much needed supply.

It is Irish Republic hosted and its dominant focus is the UK so your obvious knowledge of 7/7 and related matters would be most welcome

Regards

--Sabretache (talk) 17:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (WikiSpooks user page)Reply

Hi, I proposed Bowled Over, A Funnier Approach, Bowling Fun and Fundamentals for Boys and Girls, Walter Ray Williams Jr's Secrets to Better Bowling, and Life in the Bowling Lane! for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Timothy Good is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Good until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Nick Redfern is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Redfern until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Go Tenpin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is nothing encyclopaedic said here which is not said at British Ten Pin Bowling Association. It appears to be an article for the sake of being an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 01:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Patricia White requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sitush (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Alex Kurtagić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AerobicFox (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Messiah Poster - LC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Reveal the Power of the Pendulum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN, sourceless

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William M. Connolley (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Malcolm X: Prince of Islam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DVD appears to be non-notable. I can't find any mentions in Google News Archive or Google Books. Article has been tagged as possibly non-notable for two years with no sources added.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HolidaySnap2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Friendship Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:Verifiability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Llama's Koala (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

This research project (which I am part of) is looking for participants for a workshop in Amman in April. The workshop is about representation of and by the Middle East and North Africa, in various language Wikipedias, and looking at barriers to contribution and ways to overcome them

In particular we are interested in those who edit from or about the Middle East, either extensively, or who have been discouraged from editing more due to on-wiki issues.

Full details at http://www.zerogeography.net/2012/02/open-invitation-to-workshop-in-amman.html.

All the best,

Rich Farmbrough, 02:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC).Reply

 

The article Let's Go Bowling! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After 7 years, WP:NOTABILITY still not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thanks for the article on Baba Rampuri. I was just going to let you know that the youtube clip appeared to be a WP:LINKVIO, but it looks like you found a better source right as I was editing it. Anyway, thanks again. Grayfell (talk) 04:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baba Rampuri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Generation Identity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Order (James Rollins) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Order (James Rollins) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm HangingCurve. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lamb and Lion Ministries because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 00:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Desecration-Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakeel Ahmad Bhat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakeel Ahmad Bhat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tractor Tyres (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woden's Folk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woden's Folk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Lamb & Lion Ministries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article was previously a copypaste. Since the content has subsequently been removed there's little point in keeping the article, comprised of only one line sourced only to the organisation's website. In reality it's a speedy deletion candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Arthur Warrington Thomas. I would like to ask you for help. There is an Iranian user, name BoogaLouie who has done many editing with bad intentions and tendentious for a prolonged period and structured manner on articles relating to Sunni and Saudi arabia. Can you monitor it, or fix it. His edit based on source that can not be accountable or books from the opponent. See [1], [2], [3], [4],[5], and many more. Thank You. 36.73.105.154 (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Arthur Warrington Thomas. I would like to ask you for help. There is an Iranian user, name BoogaLouie who has done many editing with bad intentions and tendentious for a prolonged period and structured manner on articles relating to Sunni and Saudi arabia. Can you monitor it, or fix it. His edit based on source that can not be accountable or books from the opponent. See [6], [7], [8], [9],[10], and many more. Thank You. 36.73.105.154 (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is BoogaLouie. I have made quite a few edits on topics involving Wahhabi Mission, religion and politics in Saudi Arabia and related matters recently. While many of the edits are less than flattering to the Kingdom's rulers I think you will find them based on reliable sources and otherwise following wikipedia policies and regulations. (PS, I am not Iranian.) --BoogaLouie (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is all very LOL. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Igor Witkowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Witkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 13:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Kevin Tor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Tagged for notability 7 years ago by ShelfSkewed, still unresolved.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Let's Go Bowling! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Brenda Butler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edward321 (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Brenda Butler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Jamaal al-Din M. Zarabozo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 81.159.253.156 (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Educational Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Educational Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RaySingh (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Kevin Conde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:1E. Also lots of the content is unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 20:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Educational Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Educational Trust (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eleassar ^{my talk} 09:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

CSD revoked - cited webpage mirrors Wikipedia data.

CC:User:CIreland - I was researching dead links when that website came up. I should have known better and I thank you for catching that.  — Myk Streja ^(who?) 20:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Let's Go Bowling! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Go Bowling! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   20:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lasse Lintilä is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lasse Lintilä until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Warren (Rendlesham) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Warren (Rendlesham) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Phil Rees (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NJOURNALIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBG^converse 12:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:BlackSun2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Elliot John Crosby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only notable for a hi-score at bowling, twelve years ago. meets BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roxy, in the middle. wooF 12:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliot John Crosby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot John Crosby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roxy, in the middle. wooF 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Hellmut Wolff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article mixes two or more persons: Professor Hellmut Wolff, German academic (1876-1961; external links), and a German mystic (1906-1986; unreferenced).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolja21 (talk) 08:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Haugen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Haugen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Gvl018.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Russell McCloud. Since you had some involvement with the Russell McCloud redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.

Gilgamesh4 (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Arthur. My name is Luis. I have a couple of tomas leanderson bowling balls in with me. I would like very much to know their history. Please contact me. luismpalha@gmail.com

Thank you! 🙏🏻 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.132.142.148 (talk) 16:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Kand02.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I see you were a member of the (now defunct) WikiProject, Wikipedia: WikiProject Germanic Mysticism. I am currently trying to start a WikiProject Mysticism at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council which I will hope will give more comprehensive coverage of mysticism. I wonder whether you would be interested in joining such a WikiProject? If so, you can offer your support at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council. Many thanks,Vorbee (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Dear User: RobertCPrenic, it appears that Wikipedia: WikiProject Mysticism has now been started, so you may like to join. It has been suggested at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council that Wikipedia: WikiProject Germanic Mysticism could be merged into this newer WikiProject. Vorbee (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Shropshire Revolution helmet.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Kegel LLC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Existence of a company doesn't make it notable. Fails notability guidelines for companies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article The Black Sun (Twining novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no secondary sources, no evidence of notability, article only describes a minor feature

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Kusma (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Henge. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#The Henge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muchotapka. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Muchotapka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mucholapka. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Mucholapka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wenceslas Mine. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Wenceslas Mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melody MacDonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody MacDonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Caphadouk (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Chaos International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. Only source found is from a contributor. Looks like a short lived and defunct attempt at a publication

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a group with particularly clear notability. Aside from the initial BBC story, its mentions appear largely trivial. It is not mentioned in connection with the Danish embassy event on that actual page, so the only thing it seems to actually be connected with is one tiny protest (in Luton) - which itself seems like a pretty non-eventful or trivial cause for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 12:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Odinic Runology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The destination page being redirected to has no reference to anything Odinic. This page thus seems unneeded.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Alex Browne (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigel Pennick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Pennick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Tenpin Bowling Proprietors Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on PTBC Storm English Open, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article PTBC Storm English Open has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional and written from subject perspective. Fails WP:NEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 02:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Premier Tenpin Bowling Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on National Association of Youth Bowling Clubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 07:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Glossary of Germanic mysticism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and contradictory complement to an article that doesn't exist; fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ffranc (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glossary of Germanic mysticism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Germanic mysticism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ffranc (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply