Adakiko
Index
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
| 4 | WikiDefcon 4: 3.60 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot |
User:AdakikoIhateyou
editHey, you got a hater. I blocked them--it seems to be someone from some other platform. Look at the history of their userpage. Let me know if we admins can help. Drmies (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Is this my first TruFan®? I Have not had any problems yet. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Haha I don't know, but if they want to try again they'll have to go someplace else. Drmies (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
"Bccs" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Bccs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Bccs until a consensus is reached. 65.92.246.77 (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Reaching out to active contributors
editI have created a draft and is unsure on how to reach out to active reviewers / contributors for help to know whether the article is viable and can be approved? Draft:Claz'room College. Is there any advice on reaching out to get is reviewed, or advice about the page itself? Help is highly appreciated. 60.51.77.11 (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
External link replacement reverted Runtime application self-protection
editI replaced the outdated (Error 404) link with a functional one directing to the homepage of a community-driven RASP implementation. FreeRASP is a well-established RASP solution for mobile apps. The site content complies with Wikipedia:External links guidelines. As a RASP developer myself, I can assure you that the linked site is valuable for the encyclopedia, as it introduces readers to mobile RASP implementations. What do you think?
Here is the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Runtime_application_self-protection&oldid=1258370739 SirionRazzer (talk) 08:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- @SirionRazzer: https://docs.talsec.app/freerasp looks to me to be a promotional plug. Seems to point you to the business version. See wp:NOTPROMOTION. Adakiko (talk) 12:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- @SirionRazzer: You could also bring this up on wp:RSN and/or talk:Runtime application self-protection. If on talk, suggest notifying recent (maybe last few years in this case) editors. See help:dalk pages. Please add a link to the article in question if adding to someone's talk page; I added it to the section header. For a "proper" diff, see {{diff}} which I used below. Remember the double bar "||"! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- BTW: A possibly similar revert here: 25 Mar 2021 Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
User:Mega Wonder
editSee Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimlantabanao/Archive and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimlantabanao for context
So this account actively reverting my LGV version (which usually revert the edits of the socks of Jimlantabanao and some other editors) which is very suspicious, but they haven't touched the DYQC article yet. I am not sure whether this much should be enough to file an SPI case, so I came here asking for your help.
I have reached out Wikishovel, but apparently he seems to be busy at the moment. So, should I do it? 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 13:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)