AnnekeBart

• User:AnnekeBart/archive April 2010 - September 2010
• User:AnnekeBart/archive2 September 2010 - October 2010
• User:AnnekeBart/archive3 October 2010 - March 2011
• User:AnnekeBart/archive4 March 2011 - May 2011

AnnekeBart is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello AnnekeBart. Your name has been mentioned at WP:ANI#EdJohnston - administrative harassment and censorship. The discussion is about Giulio Clovio. You may add your own comment there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know Ed. It was actually already closed before I could give any response. :) The decision by Sandstein is entirely correct. Hopefully that's the end of this business. --AB (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Are names of queen Nebet and vizier Nebet connected? Because their hieroglyphs are not the same.-Michelle

The names are close, but the Queen's name is spelled different (as you mentioned). I think that sometimes happens. I have seen different spellings for Meritaten (dau of Akhenaten) as well. --AB (talk) 23:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

You probably didn't understand my question - are their names the same, but just written on the other way? Do you remember Persenet? You said me that senet can be "sister" or "game". The same is with this. Female vizier Nebet had the name which means "lady", female form of neb ("lord"). Is queen's name with the same meaning, or just sounds like vizier's name?

I did misunderstand you :) And the answer here is that I don't know. I do not know if a different spelling like the one for Nebet would influence the actual meaning of the name. --AB (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)--AB (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have written a new version of the article Dedi. It can be found here. I would be so happy if you could read over and help me setting links and help for correct english. I will please an administrator in de.wikipedia to settle the history of the german article, since the workshop version is an word-by-word translation. With best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 21:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks good at first glance :-) It would be nice to have the references as inline references. You have some footnotes, but it is often recommended that the references be given as inline references to help with verifiability. I am extremely busy right now, so I would like to look at it further but do not know when I will have time for it. --AB (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

As ye wish, mylady. ;-) I`ve been busy again and arranged the references anew. Hope it is better now? best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 00:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nice :) I did some editing. There are a couple of sentences that I did not understand. I edited them out, but you can still see them in edit mode. I would have to reread it again, but it's getting late :) --AB (talk) 03:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi there.^^ Thanks for corrections. But I have become curious about your note, that you couldn`t find the passages after Khufu`s recieving of the prophecy from Dedi.

Now, I really hope that I don`t sound smart-alec or snotty. I really don`t mean it bad!!! But I wonder which translation you may have read. The only absolute accurate translation of the whole story can be found in the books of Verena Lepper (I own one), Adolf Ermann and Miriam Liechtheim. Ok, the first two books are written in german, so they are "of no use" for you?

What me keeps busy are two special passages: The first is about the sanctuary of Thot. The problem is, that the Papyrus Westcar uses a word that can be translated in so many ways, that egyptologist prefer to let it be untranslated. The Papyrus gives , to be readed as Iput. Lepper and Erman argue, that it was a bit too easy to merely translate it with "chamber", since furthermore meanings of iput are: shrine, building, harem or storage room.

"reckoning" Gardiner "Egyptian Grammar p 553 O45 harim 142.0.102.47 (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The second passage in question is the one with the second bird that Dedi plucks. The Westcar gives

(V)

, to be readed as chet`aa-Bird, which means "the bird with the long, wooden legs". Lepper, Liechtheim and Erman are curious about this, since the name of that bird appears now and then in offering inscriptions during the old and middle kingdom, but the bird itself is never depicted! Lepper for example thinks of a small heron or a Eurasian Bittern. But none of the egyptologists makes an commitment to a translation as "waterfowl".

(Alternate portravals) of the "wooden-legged bird",
Note: the wood pillar hieroglyph,

(horizontal) (vertical)

is used to mean "great", or implied 'greatest'-(Egyptian language "aa"), so referring to the Great Wooden-legged Bird-(is it also onomatopoeic?)(Aahh!)Mmcannis (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

There`s a nice and widely reaching translation in english that is very close to Lepper`s and Ermanns one: Transcription and Translating of Papyrus Westcar (Berlin Papyrus 3033) into Englisch by Transkription Blackman (1988) (PDF-File). Hope you joy. ;-) with best regards; --Nephiliskos (talk) 11:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

LOL Not smart-alecky or snotty at all! I was a bit tired last night and I probably should have posted some of my changes as questions below your text instead. You clearly know much more about this than I do, so I am not going to be upset at all if you change things back the way they were. I was looking at an online translation [1] which is said to be adapted from Nederhof and Blackman. I do read German - albeit slowly - and German references are fine. I think our earlier discussion may have been that German references should be added to English ones on wikipedia, but not necessarily replace them? (If I remember the conversation correctly?)

I see your point about the iput translation. I don't know what the best way is to write that up? Maybe use the word iput (in italics) in the text and then actually explain that the translation is not clear, but that it could refer to chambers, shrines, buildings, etc. But even Nederhof's translation uses "chambers" as the translation.

For the decapitated animals: the translation you provided mentions a goose, a Khtaa-goose and a bull. Don't know, but maybe summarizing that as two different birds and a bull might be the easiest way to represent that in the article?

I hopefully will have a bit more time to look at it again this evening. I really like the article you wrote by the way. It's a definite improvement over what there is right now. Regards Anneke --AB (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your plaudit, that makes mee feel mega-happy.^^ I was busy again and arranged the references anew again. Now I have setted refs to the unsure passages. I think there shall be more explanation for the reader, too. I have thought about writing articles about the other heros of the Westcar-Papyrus, but I shall find a administrator, who could do an adjustment of the german versions, cuz I did translations of them. Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you are talking about queen Iput, I think her name is without meaning, just written on hieroglyphs as ipwt. For Anneke: I can't find any more information about Meresankh and Raherka. - Michelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.53.179.232 (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. No, the Iput of Papyrus Westcar is some kind of object or place, no person. Khufu wonders about the number of the Iput inside the sanctuary of Thot. ;-) Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I can understand you confusion but "The number of" = the "reckoning"

(edit conflict)No we are not talking about Queen Iput, but rather the word iput as used in the Westcar papyrus. In that setting it refers to a chamber/shrine/building. The meaning of the word is somewhat unclear.

Re:Meresankh and Raherka, there is not a lot of information about these people, which is exactly the problem I was pointing out. It is difficult/impossible to write a good wikipedia article if there is no solid coverage of them in several good secondary sources (i.e. books and refereed articles). --AB (talk) 13:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I proudly present: Dedi!^^ Best regards; --Nephiliskos (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

A new hero of the Westcar is in the workshop.^^ Best regards; --Nephiliskos (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking forward to seeing it. --AB (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It´s finished. --Nephiliskos (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I was a bit slow and did not realize it was here. Looks great. I made some (few) minor changes. Looks good! And you don't have to mention me when you post it (like you did in the edit summary for Dedi). You are doing all the real work. I'm just looking it over. :-) --AB (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ok, ok, sorry.^^ Then I will ask an admin for history adjustment and a new article will be born. ^^ best regards; --Nephiliskos (talk) 20:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem at all. Just meant to save you some typing (kidding). And don't go through the trouble of a history adjustment. I think that may be a waste of your time. The new article is a nice idea. I like the seperate pages for the different magicians. Cheers --AB (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, then... tadaaa!.^^ Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Very nice article! --AB (talk) 22:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanx!^^ In my workshop there`s the third hero of the Westcar! --Nephiliskos (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

What do you think about this - Raherka and Meresankh? We have links, true statements and Meresankh is redirected to Raherka.--Mychele (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

That is much better :-) Excellent solution. I added some information about the sculpture based on the Louvre page. I still put on the "Orphan tag" because there is only one other page linking to it and that is a disambiguation page. But this is a nice short article. And who knows, maybe other publications will become available for this statue. It is a remarkable piece. I am somewhat surprised it does not show up in more of the literature. Mychele, have you seen anything about where this statue was found? Is it from Giza? Or is the provenance not known? --AB (talk) 12:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Never mind :-) Found the information. The statue probably comes from Mastaba D 37 in Giza. I included the info in the article. And found some ways to link to Raherka and Meresankh from other articles so it's not an orphan article any more. --AB (talk) 16:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anne, I think we can be a great team here. Can you tell me who are some other users interested in AE? I know for Alensha and MMcanis.-Michelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.12.113 (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think that it worked out quite well on this one. I should "warn" you though. I will not have a lot of time to work on articles. I will be very busy with work. --AB (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I heard that there are so called "good articles". According to me, this one - Hemetre - could be recognised as one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.12.113 (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure it will satisfy the Wikipedia:Good article criteria. The lead section does not really summarize the page all that well. It is accurate and verifiable and fairly stable. You can nominate it and see what happens. --AB (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have worked my ass off to write down the whole conversation between king Khufu and Dedi. Please take a look into the article. What you see now is - dare I say - the most accurate and up-to-date translation. Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 03:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, could you help resolve the DYK issue here for the article Dedi? The user Nephiliskos asked that I discuss the issue with you. Thanks.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

@AnnekeBart: The problem is: It`s my first DYK-tryout, the article is well cited, as you know. I`m trying doggetly to explain to William S. Saturn, that all speeches in the article are cited perfectly by the literature, too. It looks a bit like there´s intrustment because some of the books are in a -for users of this Wikipedia- in a foreign language. It begins to feel like a inquisition questioning. :D I thought it`s just for DYK, not for a excellent-candidacy... Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 00:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but I have no time at this point. Doesn't look like I will be able to "come up for air" until sometime next week.--AB (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

No need to excuse, Anneke. In extremo I can re-start a try for DYK, no problem. Take your time, privat life is always more important. ;-) Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Anneke, I see you come back. It's nice to see you again. Stating that Khenut could be mother of Iput is not my original idea. We cannot put away the possibility. - Michelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.135.191 (talk) 07:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If it is not your idea then you need to provide the source. The publication where that is mentioned is needed. --AB (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why we have two articles on Amun's high priests, I've raised this at the project page. Since you've edited both I presume you see a reason, but I think we could have just one. Dougweller (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I edited both pages because that's how I found the information displayed on Wikipedia. The only reason I can think of for splitting it up that way is because the Theban High Priests of Amun were much more powerful than regular high priests and were in fact de facto rulers of that region. Having said that I think the two pages could be merged. The increased political power of these Priests could be explained within the article. The name "Theban High Priests of Amun" is rather a bad choice for the other article. The other high priests also held their office in Thebes. --AB (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I´ve extended the article, hope you like it. ;-) Best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to original reference (AnnekeBart edit)

and current reference - see below p.68 Petrie Drift chambers (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

And how is this in improvement? The website I used as a reference quotes a solid publucation from 1954: Henri Wild, Statue de Hor-Néfer au Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lausanne, BIFAO 54 (1954) pp.173-222. Yours is an old text from 1938 by Petrie? Replacing a proper citation by one with an older text is not exactly an improvement. --AB (talk) 15:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

anyway found this http://www.jstor.org/pss/3822006 which possibly links to other sites with relevant arguments,although jstor isn't open sourceDrift chambers (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have access to JSTOR, so I can take a look at that paper and see if there is information we can add to the article. Or at least add it as a reference. Cheers Anneke --AB (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to bug ye, but I get problems. Can you help meh please? Best wishes.--Nephiliskos (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will take a look at it and see if the changes you proposed can be merged into the article instead of replacing parts of it. Cheers - Anneke --AB (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Captmondo!^^ I wonder if it made sense to discuss the new hiero-boxes I used to present the names of the early kings. I see some problems with the older boxes:

• No horus-name, no gold-name, no nebtj-name... NOTHING. The old boxes give no useful information, and if so, these informations are redundant, incorrect or incomplete.
• The old boxes call upon the mommahs and poppahs of the early kings. This is highly problematic, since Egyptologists are pretty unsure about any interfamiliar kinships. Few exception are queen Meritneith and queen Hetep-herj-nebtj (the mom of Djoser). Their names appear on seal impressions, together with their titles declaring them as king´s moms. Yes, I know, the Palermostone calles some king´s mommahs, too. But their identities are questioned, because their names do not appear in the early dynastic tombs.
• The German boxes I use beat us the opportunity to present all important names of the early kings in words and signs. In german Wikipedia a broad palette of different hiero-boxes also give the chance to even sho titles and rare name forms.

It´s not about meh, ok... I rlly just wonder if it was possible to introduce and use the new boxes instead of the old ones. I´m sure that you will agree with meh after taking a closer look tot it. With best regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)PS: I please everyone to respond at mah talk page, so I get it when You are on.Reply

Hello there:

Just wanted to point out a proposed change to the Pharaoh infobox that I have made, and would value your opinion on.

Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Nephiliskos (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello AnnekeBart! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

Meanwhile I was VERY busy. I thought some kind of "congress" was good in whih everyone who assisted and advised meh so generously shall be there, to discuss the up-to-date sutuation. Is my administrating the new box good? Are there still questions? Pls take some moments and join the discussion. Thx. Cheers;--Nephiliskos (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas, dear Anneke!--Mychele (talk)

Hello there -- long time no speak! Sorry, have been busy with a number of things for a while, and have not been very active here since helping to bring the Rosetta Stone up to Featured status last year.

Business will take me to Cambridge, U.K. next week, and am planning on visiting the extensive Ancient Egyptian collection at the Fitzwilliam Museum while there and I plan on bringing my camera along (assuming non-flash photography is allowed). Is there anything you will like me to be on the look-out for to help illustrate any of the articles you have an interest in?

Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, dear Annie! Happy Easter! I am not longer interested in AE as before, but I will always remember you!-Your Mychele (talk)

Frohe Ostern! :D Cheers! --Nephiliskos (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, thanks! Frohe Ostern, too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.139.11.149 (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anneke! Can you, please, help me? Do you know how to collect all talk in archives? I saw this on some talk pages. Answer when you will have a time, it's not important. See you! - Mychele

Hi. Please read and enjoy the new Khufu!^^ Greetz;--Nephiliskos (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dear Anne! Do you remember my first question about Nefermaat and Itet? And your investigation about Princess Hetepheres... I am now going on a Wikibreak. I do not know how long my Wikibreak would last, but if you see this message, please, help Nephiliskos, who is very interested in AE and expanded so many articles. I cannot help him in next several months. But above all this, thank you! You are my friend. Until we meet again! – Hathorhotep (Miha (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC))Reply

You may wish to comment on a user conduct discussion regarding Paul Bedson, which can be found here. If you comment there you may wish to review the rules for user conduct comments first. You are receiving this notification because you were involved in the AE discussion last year. Dougweller (talk) 14:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

from the article Fifth Dynasty of Egypt. I hope i was correct in doing so, and I think you will know if it's right or not since you have edited the article before.76.218.104.120 (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Could you look at the latest edits at Horus? If this is right, it seems to contradict your edits at Rhind Mathematical Papyrus on Horus eye fractions. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I do not see which edits that would be? The very latest changes to Horus are about immaculate conception it seems? I do not quite understand what I should be looking at. --AB (talk) 18:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Many many apologies, both for my delay in responding and my mentioning the wrong article (it's Eye of Horus. See [2]. Dougweller (talk) 11:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Anneke, in your Wikipedia article "Ahmose called Turo", you mention confidently that "Ahmose called Turo was Viceroy of Kush under Amenhotep I and Tuthmosis I". As far as I could find, and also mentioned in your article, he is only called "king's son"'. The same is true for all his successors (Seni, Nehi, Usersatet, Amenhotep, Merymose). According to 'A History of Ancient Egypt' by Marc van de Mieroop, the first mention of 'King's so of Kush' is Thutmose IV's reign. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.50.206.165 (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

That is based on the article The Viceroys of Ethiopia by George A. Reisner The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 1. (Jan., 1920), pp. 28-55. The earlier title King's Son was later expanded to read King's Son of Kush, but they were viceroys of Kush no matter which version of the title they used. Maybe that should be made more clear on the Viceroy of Kush page? ---AB (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:AnnekeBart/sandbox2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AnnekeBart/sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:AnnekeBart/sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Radio programs are perfectly acceptable sources as they are one of many types of media. Books are another media form, the one I prefer personally the most (just like you do). Besides, it makes it more interesting for the using Wikipedian to know that there is an archived audio recording out there. The present referencing for the entire article is still inadequate but undoubtedly will be improved upon [an issue that plagues all of Wikipedia]. I was aware of the items and Gebel el-Silsila before I found the archived program. Just decided to dig a little to improve referencing. I think adding referencing is certainly preferable to deleting it! Even the ones you have can be further referenced. If I can find the program I am sure others can too. To prove the point, I am not in the Mid-West or Wisconsin. I am in Los Angeles. On another matter and for your kind general knowledge, Wikipedia discourages bulleted lists of factoids within articles. Wikipedia prefers an article in prose. I think the few shrines and stelae listed are OK for now. Enjoying your input too! To a better Wikipedia! Cheers! Thor Dockweiler (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dear AnnekeBart,

I was wondering if you have seen Ian Mladjov's article here. The evidence is strong that he might exist since he used the rare Amun epithet Mereramun just like Ramesses IX and XI--the other known Ramesside kings rather than meryamun. It is free and interesting. I suppose the Egyptologists will eventually decide. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

• No problem. Here is a photo of this king's cartouche. Some Egyptologists may like the idea of this new king since it resolves the problems in Karl Jansen Winkeln's 1992 thesis that Herihor succeeded Piankh. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nakhtmin (Scribe). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nakhtmin. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nakhtmin. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Joshualouie711^talk 17:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Dear AB,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, -Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramose (TT7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Re (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Judging by the talk page archives, I see that you have shown a strong interest for the article Cleopatra in the past. Would you be interested in reviewing it as a Featured Article Candidate? If so, please share your thoughts and critiques at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cleopatra/archive1. It would be most appreciated. Regards, Pericles of Athens^Talk 16:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

This article was created in Jan 2005, BC added in June 2005 and you changed it to BCE here[3] in June 2010 and it's been BCE since. But see this which I've just reverted. Typical of the editor as I recall. I've warned them and revertedDoug Weller talk 05:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amarna Tomb 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just joined the Ancient Egypt Wikiproject and have edited KV7. I've also written two articles from scratch, Theban Tomb 159 and Theban Tomb 286. Not sure if I need to notify you or someone else in the group about it. Or are we all just working separately? I don't want to step on anyone's toes or cause anyone additional work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michiganwolverinette (talk • contribs) 05:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply