Cyclopia

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Office Assistant on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rumble (company) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaetognatha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Uh, I see this only now. Thanks, I guess! :) cyclopia^speak! 15:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

On 2 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that white moths are suspected to cause seasonal hyperacute panuveitis in Nepal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Destruction of the Moon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, apologies - Due to unexpected circumstances am extremely busy at the moment, so I cannot work on the article now. It's okay if the DYK didn't work. Many thanks for your pings and sorry for any inconvenience! cyclopia^speak! 10:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bitcoin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

On my system, I was SHRINKING the lead photo, by a significant amount, at Penis with both edits. Were my edits making it larger on yours? Very odd. Frankly, your reducing it a further 20px wasn't much of a change but I'm fine with it. Must have been a system difference though, since every time you said I was enlarging it, it was shrinking on my copy. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

On my browser (Chrome) it was definitely larger. The 20px reduction put it in the same width of the infobox. What is your system? We could share screenshots and, if there is actually a difference in rendering, ask what is going on technically. cyclopia^speak! 16:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, that's interesting. I'm using Edge Chromium so wouldn't have expected much of a difference. I'll do a test revert so I can capture a screenshot, hang on. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You don't need to revert, just use the history. cyclopia^speak! 16:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Here you can find the difference. cyclopia^speak! 16:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah thanks! I wasn't actually going to revert; I was just capturing screenshots from the previews. That's handy, thanks. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Available here https://easyupload.io/2vm2ly. I suspect the "original" image (with no width specified, last image) was at a 495px width as that's the preview size. Current version of Edge is 130.0.2849.80 64-bit. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand. On your file, it is clear that your 440px edit is clearly larger, exactly as I saw. cyclopia^speak! 16:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah no sorry, missed the last page! Ok that's indeed different from my case, and weird. I wonder if it is also because I use another skin (Monobook)? cyclopia^speak! 16:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, that could be...I'm still using Vector Legacy. Maybe that's the difference? Eh, regardless, it's resolved now! Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The skin seems to make no difference. Firefox on my system (Ubuntu Linux) shows the original image in this edit small as well. cyclopia^speak! 16:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, then that IS weird. Maybe something particular to Edge Chromium or my specific setup? I checked the image differences on my iPhone (Safari) and the 440px and no-width images appeared the same there also. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just tried Chrome on my system; 440px and no-width are the same size there too. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's Edge. The images I posted were on my work computer; when I switch to my personal, 440px and no-width appear the same there also. The work laptop is used heavily for graphics editing and publications, so perhaps there's some atypical default setting that's mucking with the browser? I'll have to do more exploration. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply