[go: up one dir, main page]

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

readded 
removed 

  CheckUser changes

removed  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

removed  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Political marriages in India

edit

Political marriages in India's protection has been upgraded to indefinite extended confirmed level , would you consider removing pending changes protection since it's no longer necessary? Ratnahastin (talk) 03:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done Chetsford (talk) 03:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Tehshakur

edit

Did you forget to actually do the unblock here? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

LOL, I did - thank you! Should be fixed now. Chetsford (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Who

edit

Hi, any idea who RodeoReal76164 is?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Bbb23: Possibly a stupid question, but isn't that Daronandon? Polygnotus (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
No idea. I suppose I could request a CU. Honestly, I know nothing about the history of this whatever-it-is.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh yes, that's a good point. Now that I read their comments on the Talk page more closely there does seem to be some similarity. Chetsford (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
On further examination, Polygnotus, I think you're correct and have filed an SPI here. Chetsford (talk) 03:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Some of the word and phrasing use might lead one to believe it is MartinPict or one of its affiliated accounts. Beyond that, I could only speculate. Chetsford (talk) 23:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
All this drama on one of the most boring articles on Wikipedia! Polygnotus (talk) 08:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lat Drop AfC

edit

Hello Chetsford,what are the specific issues with my article and how can I address them? SheneganShaw (talk) 02:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi SheneganShaw - you have four sources. Two of those appear to be your analysis of YouTube videos. This is problematic from the standpoint of both WP:OR and WP:RS. Your other two sources are offline -- which is totally fine -- but don't contain enough information (i.e. publisher, page number, etc.) by which we could determine, at a minimum, if they're RS, let alone WP:VERIFY their contents or existence. Please also read WP:SIGCOV. Chetsford (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply