Ceplm

  An article that you have been involved in editing, Ipse dixit , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. SteveBaker (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Per your comments in this village pump discussion last Feb, I thought you might be interested in this article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

is marriage really a defining characteristic of a saint? Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

no, but it is interesting group of them; e.g., when we have Spanish, Italian, etc. saints, why not the married ones?

Hi Ceplm and thank you for your message on my talk page. I didn't 'kill' the article and had no intention to dishearten you, I just asked if you could supply more references as per notability of books guidelines. I hope that you will do this and then resubmit. Any book by Thackeray is, due to the reputation of the author, notable but we also have a requirement for references for all articles on Wikipedia and a link to the text itself does not suffice. It would be really helpful to know more – just a sentence or two with a source or two to make the article useful to people. For instance, you could add that it was written under his pseudonym Michael Angelo Titmarsh; you could tell us why he wrote it and describe its critical reception – Trollope is said to have admired it. This source might be useful [1] (Thackerary's parody is mentioned near the end of the article, in not very favourable terms). I would also have thought that some print versions of the novella would be quite likely to have a scholarly foreword that would provide just a bit more context. I think your judgement of the volunteers at Wikipedia is a little harsh – but it would be good if you could join us and help improve the balance of articles on Wikipedia. Many thanks and do get in touch if you'd like any assistance from me. Libby norman (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rebecca and Rowena, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello Ceplm. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rebecca and Rowena".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Rebecca and Rowena}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ceplm. Sorry for "stalking" you here, but it's the place, where you have last been "seen". I am happy to inform you, that s:de:Anastasius Katzenschlucker, der große Zauberer is close to being finished. Thank you for wht you have done so far. We ran in a problem towards the end however with missing pages; could you help please; details here. --Maasikaru (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

The page List of ambassadors of Austra-Hungary to France has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply