Colin M

The article Chippendales Audition you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Chippendales Audition for comments about the article, and Talk:Chippendales Audition/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 18:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article Les Avariés you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Les Avariés for comments about the article, and Talk:Les Avariés/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article White Diamonds you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:White Diamonds and Talk:White Diamonds/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jonathanischoice -- Jonathanischoice (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article White Diamonds you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:White Diamonds for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jonathanischoice -- Jonathanischoice (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I happened on your mini-essay on the importance of names and really appreciated it. I was thinking something similar when writing Rigveda 1.32. It's a famous text with tons of good coverage but it doesn't really have a name and I think that's why no-one has written an article on it until now. Haukur (talk) 07:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I'm glad it resonated with you. It's an idea I come back to a lot. I'm definitely all in favour of just coming up with a best-effort title for things like this that are clearly independently notable but lack a widely agreed on name. Colin M (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply