96.54.184.11

  Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. Your recent edit to the page Hideki Tojo appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Strongman (politics). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Waggie (talk) 05:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Strongman (politics). Waggie (talk) 05:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Strongman (politics)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Motion 103. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Prime Ministers of Spain, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ramón María Narváez, 1st Duke of Valencia. Materialscientist (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Strongman (politics) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Strongman (politics) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://fjordman.blogspot.ca/2005/04/swedens-strongman-ponders-premature.html?m=0) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Do not change the order of Finnish prime ministers without consensus. For example, Pehr Evind Svinhufvud was both the 1st and the 18th prime minister. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Juha Sipilä, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Juha Sipilä, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please refrain from writing vulgar attacks against other editors in edit summaries. [1] hydrox (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Before making further changes please refer to a reliable source, like this list on government's official website. --hydrox (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Prime Ministers of Finland. hydrox (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:96.54.184.11 reported by User:Hydrox (Result: ). Thank you. hydrox (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Please don't add numbers to the infobox of French prime ministers. It makes absolutely no sense to number prime ministers across a variety of regimes dating back to before the job was even invented. People have asked you again and again not to do this for various countries. Thanks. Mezigue (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Same comment with regard to Spanish prime ministers. It has taken long to revert all your changes. Best regards --Discasto (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.54.184.11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.54.184.11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for Abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.54.184.11 for a listing of IPs who edit like you do. I notice the issue of numbering of prime ministers, for which you were blocked at AN3 (see above). EdJohnston (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Alexis Tsipras. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 21:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Dr. K. 21:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Same rationale as in the block notice from May 2017. Today, on August 19 you have made more than thirty edits changing the numbering of various prime ministers in their infoboxes. There is no evidence you've ever tried to get consensus for this type of change. (You have never posted on a talk page to explain your edits or to persuade others to agree with them). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply