216.164.249.213

I looked at the article talk page discussion. I didn't have a clue as to what in the article the dispute was about. Maybe the other editors did know. What I knew is that the discussion wasn't civil. Maybe you were discussing article content. In any case, discuss content, not contributors. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion was about certain edits made by user Phil81194. I tried to keep the discussion on that topic as much as I reasonably saw fit, but I'll be even more conservative about that in the future. Cheers. 216.164.249.213 (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! 216.164.249.213 (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I pinged you at Talk:Human extinction#Risk_estimates, but I don't think wp:ping actually works for IP editors, so allow me to draw your attention to it. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 04:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

great, thanks 216.164.249.213 (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Amy Schumer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, so presumably not a bot. I left a comment on your talk page, please engage with me there or if preferred here 216.164.249.213 (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are trolling via WP:SEALIONING. You can engage with another admin to explain how this isn't trolling if you want to file an unblock request. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

No I wasn't, you're wrong. I barely even know of schumer outside of constantly hearing her being called one of the world's worst comedians. I can show several conversations i've had to that end. You are just a poor judge of behavior as well as being extremely out of touch with her public reception.

"You can engage with another admin to explain how this isn't trolling if you want to file an unblock request." will do, although my guess is you're all in cahoots together. While I'm doing that, why don't you send the edit to 5 normally socially-functioning people under the age of 30 and ask them what they think. Cheers

P.S. I would prefer if you would stop referring to me as a troll. Stop doing that, now. 216.164.249.213 (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

216.164.249.213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Here goes nothing. Banned for good-faith edits, absolutely no explanation or justification given. Banning admin thinks i'm "sealioning" for some reason216.164.249.213 (talk) 17:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Good block, possibly a little short. Yamla (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

216.164.249.213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Still absolutely no idea what i did wrong. Please approve or deny request with reasoning attached, thanks 216.164.249.213 (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I can see the uncivil undertones in your comments and this isn't new from this IP address(which I assume has been you). I think this is a good block. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

civil undertone? what the hell are you talking about? i think all of you have spent too much time online. but clearly this is a lost cause. goodbye! your encyclopedia doesnt deserve me. 6 month ban for "uncivil undertones" LMFAO what to expect from truth-hating communists — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.249.213 (talk) 14:39, December 2, 2023 (UTC)

And there went the veneer of civility. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't support the abolition of private property ownership, which is what communism actually is. Hopefully your attitude changes in 6 months. 331dot (talk) 22:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

i did use his page and he reverted it 216.164.249.213 (talk) 12:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply