Talk:Vladimir Žerjavić
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vladimir Žerjavić article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
croatianhistory.net
editIn what way is croatianhistory.net a WP:RS? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- I am not sure if that questions is addressed to me but after a cursory look at the site I certainly would not rely on it but whether or not it qualifies is something that if disputed would have to eventually be resolved by an admin anyway, so why not cut out the middle-man? Yours, Quis separabit? 01:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
RE: Žerjavić
editThe article states that "[A]fter 1934 he worked in the private sector, and after 1945 in various institutions of SFR Yugoslavia" -- anyone have any idea what he was doing between 1939 and 1945? Quis separabit? 01:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Hidden text
editI hid the following text due to inconsistencies:
Professor Vladeta Vučković, Serbian author of the official 1946 Yugoslav document, agrees with Žerjavić's and Kočović's estimates. She stated {{When|date=November 2015}} that he {{Who|date=November 2015}} had calculated a demographic loss of 1,700,000, and that later that number was interpreted as actual number of victims and presented by Yugoslav delegation on peace conference later that year in Paris.<ref>Nikolić, Goran. [http://www.nspm.rs/Debate/2006_POM_nikolic_zrtve111.htm "Žrtve rata između nauke i propagande"], nspm.rs; accessed 8 November 2015.{{sr icon}}</ref>
- This does not completely make sense
How could she agree with both "Žerjavić's and Kočović's estimates" when they have certain significant differences? And which is the "he" who calculated a demographic loss of 1,700,000", more than 600,000 more than either calculation shown above. Quis separabit? 01:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)