Talk:US Senate career of Joe Biden
Latest comment: 3 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from Joe Biden was split to United States Senate career of Joe Biden on April 30, 2020 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Joe Biden. |
Years in senate
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The entire timeline of this article may need to be rewritten Joe Biden joined the senate 120 years ago according to both himself and snopes, our timeline is way off.[1] 99.99.46.20 (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Too much duplication
editThere's way too much duplicated from Joe Biden. I'm thinking particularly of the personal background, first campaign, death of family, remarriage, and other early material. This is about his senate career and should keep the first-campaign material strictly business, then go to his swearing-in. Similar criticism may apply to other material later in the article but I didn't look. EEng 01:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @EEng: I am not terribly familiar with splits (this was my first major split proposal) and I assumed at the time that such an article would basically be a more detailed summary of his life in these years. After looking at a bit of United States Senate career of Hillary Clinton, I think that the possible solutions for the personal issues would be one of the following:
- Doing nothing
- Removing the "family deaths" and similar personal things from the article unless it had a notable effect on his Senate activities, and either (a) moving them to a new "personal life" section of the article, or (b) the sections they were in previously (within their original sections in the main article, but not in this article).
- My preference is for option 2b, though any option other than 1 would require some major changes to parts of this article. I am also unsure of whether the 2008 campaign should be included given that this would be about his Senate activities specifically. Username6892 (Peer Review) 01:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- I think 2 is the right approach. Within that, 2a is definitely wrong: this article is about his senate career, and anything that isn't needed to help the reader understand that doesn't belong here. So, for example, the family deaths should be mentioned in one sentence, and the fact that it affected his work for a time in another, but that's about it. 2b seems wrong as well, because this material is indeed already treated in the main article -- edited, of course, by yours truly to eliminate flab. (It't not beyond conceiving, of course, that I might have over-cut here and there.) EEng 02:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- EEng, Would what I did with the Family deaths sections of this and the main article be good? Username6892 (Peer Review) 21:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest I haven't the energy to delve into details, but I saw your edit at the main article in passing and it looks like you're doing the right thing. EEng 23:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- EEng, Would what I did with the Family deaths sections of this and the main article be good? Username6892 (Peer Review) 21:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- I think 2 is the right approach. Within that, 2a is definitely wrong: this article is about his senate career, and anything that isn't needed to help the reader understand that doesn't belong here. So, for example, the family deaths should be mentioned in one sentence, and the fact that it affected his work for a time in another, but that's about it. 2b seems wrong as well, because this material is indeed already treated in the main article -- edited, of course, by yours truly to eliminate flab. (It't not beyond conceiving, of course, that I might have over-cut here and there.) EEng 02:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States Senate career of Huey Long which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)