Talk:Trams in Belgrade
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New Photos
editAdded new photos --IIAleksandarII (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Tramvaj-KAF-1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Tramvaj-KAF-1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC) |
Move article to "Trams in Belgrade"?
editThe title of this article is rather "non-standard" for English-language Wikipedia. Articles on metropolitan tram systems tend to have a "Trams in [city]" title - for example: Trams in Vienna, Trams in Prague, Trams in Moscow, etc.
If there are no objections lodged here in the next week or so, I intend to "move" this article to "Trams in Belgrade" in the near future. If anyone has issues with this, or other comments, please post them here. --IJBall (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
The map and the list of lines is now inaccurate
editSince June or July 2019, the lines 13 and 11 cross the Sava across the Ada Bridge and there is a loop across and around the future intercity coach (bus) station in New Belgrade (Novi Beograd) returning to the railway station of the same name and onwards towards their old terminus.
This is not represented on either the map (which I do not know how to edit, as it is not a JPG format) or the list of major directions of these two lines (ie 11 and 13). It should be fixed.
- This is the current permanent state of the lines > https://xdn.tf.rs//2019/07/04/simpl-bg-map-830x0.jpg. Kindly have someone correct the map and the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.32.66 (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Restoration of line 1 section neutrality
editThis section is quite clearly written by somebody who does not support the initiative. This section should probably just stick to the facts rather than getting into a debate about its merits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.156.217.116 (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)