[go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Talk:Thomas Wilcher

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleThomas Wilcher has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 25, 2008Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
March 20, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
June 28, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 27, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that 1985 NCAA hurdling champion Thomas Wilcher won the Michigan High School Athletic Association team track & field championship three consecutive times, both as an athlete and a coach?
Current status: Good article

Hangon

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I request 5-7 days to beef up this article to properly sourced notability.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Does being a NCAA National Champion and 3-time NCAA first team All-American pass at Wikipedia:SPORTS#Amateur_sports_people?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 16:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
He seems to be a competitor who has competed at the highest level in amateur sports, but I do not see that he meets the general criteria of secondary sources published about him as stated in both Wikipedia:Bio#Athletes and Wikipedia:SPORTS#Amateur_sports_people. At this time I still do not believe that the article meets notability requirements. If there are secondary sources about his college career, then he may. Jons63 (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed the PROD template after seeing his listing at http://www.michtrack.org/AOY.htm -- he was twice a Michigan High School Athlete of the Year (and his athletic career continued after high school). The fact that his college career was two decades ago means that there will be far less "secondary sources" web content about him than there would be for a contemporary athlete of similar accomplishments. If there is still a desire to delete this article, take it to AfD. --Orlady (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago22 comments2 people in discussion
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Putting on hold.

General comments:

  • (2a) References
  • Reference #8 needs a page number for verifiability and the ISBN.
  • References #9 and #10 go to a search screen, which tells me nothing about what they are citing.
  • Ref #14 is no longer available for free. Can another reference be found to put in its place?
  • Ref #15 is no longer available.
  • Ref #24 also cannot be found.
  • (3a) Broad in coverage
  • Is there nothing known about his childhood? Where was he born? Where did he grow up? Does he have siblings?
  • What about his adult life? Is he married? Does he have children?
  • What about school? Was he a good student? Did he ever get in trouble for his grades? Did he win any academic scholarships?
  • Did he play football in high school? The section only mentions track and field.
  • He is not the subject of biographical articles. As a sidelight to most articles he is mentioned in his life story remains unpublished. He was not a notable high school football player by wikipedia standards, based on ungoogleable level of excellence. His personal life is not told in any articles so I have no information on his family, childhood, adult life other than that Gholston helped him fix up rental properties that he owns. I think owning rental property is unencyclopedic, so I omitted it in the absence of additional related subject matter.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 18:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Although the article lacks breadth due to his supporting role in all articles, it is notable that there is an uncommonly high propensity for him to be mentioned in articles about his former players. He must be an interesting personality of sorts for this to occur.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 19:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • (4) POV
  • The article seems pretty "Yay. He's great. He accomplished this and this" to me. Did he ever mess up a game? Did he have critics?
  • (6) Pics
  • There are no pics, but the article won't fail because of that. A pic would be nice, though.
  • General comments
  • The article could use an infobox of some sort.
  • Try to avoid using phrases like "it is notable that" or "this is notable because". The word notable appears three times in the article. These sentences need to reworded.
  • The last sentence of High school, says "is considered the fastest in state history by some". I understand why some people would consider it the fastest and why others wouldn't. However, who considers it the fastest. If you are going to mention it, clarify it, or else it sounds weaselly.
  • Who is Vernon Gholston? A wikilink in that section too might be useful (although there is one located under the section above it). Also, why mention him at all? What has he done as an athlete in his career that makes him worthy of mention in this article? In other words, how is he famous, and where would I have heard the name before? Ex: ...Vernon Gholston, the current linebacker for the such-and-such team,...
  • "This is pretty similar to the story as told by Wilcher except his side is deeper" The wording here is very informal. Pretty similar? Deeper? I think saying something along the lines of "A similar, although more indepth, story has been told by Wilcher..."

I'm putting the article on hold until the above is addressed. At the end of the day on March 19, I'll re-examine the article, either passing or failing it. If you have questions, either leave them on my talk page or here, as I'll pop in every couple of days to check on the progress. Good luck in improving the article. Nikki311 23:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll look over it later when I have a little more time, but even with a little scanning, I can tell that it is looking better. Nikki311 23:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Great work! The article is looking better, but I'm hesitant to pass it due to the lack of breadth. You should be proud of the improvement, though. I'll wait the week if you want to try looking some more. If you'd like me to fail it, so you can renominate for a second opinion, I'm cool with that, too. Nikki311 04:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I understand the standards. If I don't find anything in a week, I understand if it fails.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 19:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
The week is up, so I'm going to fail the article due to lack of breadth. Looking back over the article, another thing it needs before renomination is Template:Persondata. Nikki311 00:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NOTICE FOR GA2 REVIEWER

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has not changed significantly since being denied promotion. Two things have happened however. 1. Vernon Gholston has become a top NFL athlete. This makes Wilcher's contribution to the world of athletics much more significant. 2. It has come to my attention that certain breadth requirements are not germane if the information is not in the public domain. I do not believe information about Wilcher's personal life is in the Public domain although I may be wrong.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Wilcher/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Gary King (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gary King (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • "Marko Cooper, who was 1999 All-USA second team." – shouldn't it be "Marko Cooper, who was on the 1999 All-USA second team."

Please resolve this issue. Otherwise, the article meets the Good Article criteria and has therefore been passed. Gary King (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Wilcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Thomas Wilcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thomas_Wilcher&oldid=1208320362"