Talk:The Lady Eve

It should be known, despite attempts to revert the edit, that "Monckton Hoffe" is merely a pseudonym for Preston Sturges, who wrote the screenplay alone. Hoffe does not exist. 74.67.124.111 (talk) 07:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Really? What about the credit list for Hoffe on IMDB, which indicates a date of birth (1880 in Ireland) and death (1951 in London), and this filmography on TCM? What about Hoffe's credits before Sturges was in the business? What about Monckton's Broadway credits beginning in 1910, when Sturges was 12 years old?

What's your source? Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 23:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Then there's this article in the New York Times from 1910:

Monckton Hoffe's Impressions.; Newly Arrived British Playwright on Things New and Strange to Him -- He Asks Some Questions.

October 16, 1910, Sunday

Section: Drama Society Music, Page X2, 1809 words

MONCKTON HOFFE, author of "The Little Damozel," is having his first experience with American customs, habits, and hotels. He has been here for a week, and he likes the last named very much. He acknowledges being a sentimentalist with a leaven of opportunism, and he does not like warm weather.

It seems clear that Monckton Hoffe is a real person, not a pseudonym for Sturges. If you've got a source that says otherwise, can you please post it here so it can be checked out? Best to do that before you change the article again. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 23:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia makes a distinction between a sharp (cheater) and a shark (legitimate player). Other sites are divided on whether there is a difference in meaning; however all agree on the definition of a sharp, so that's the one I used. Clarityfiend 03:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The analysis section hardly presents a neutral POV, and doesn't cite references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.139.72 (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The heavy reliance on these sources is problematic and as much as possible, should be supplemented by verifiable reference sources. IMDb is especially egregious as the entries are written in a non-moderated forum. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC).Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Lady Eve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1953094,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Lady Eve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419221742/http://www.loc.gov/film/registry_titles.php to http://www.loc.gov/film/registry_titles.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0%2C29569%2C1953094%2C00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/10top10.pdf?docID=381&AddInterest=1781

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The well-known nickname was removed from both the cast listing and the plot. Should be added back somewhere, fans of the film probably would instantly recognize the name 'Hopsie' and where it came from, and likely wouldn't know the character's real name. Barbara Stanwyck saying the name 'Hopsie' are iconic film moments (at least to some fans). Randy Kryn (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Well-known"? An "iconic" film moment? Hardly. Consider, for example, TCM's detailed synopsis. Not a mention of "Hopsie". Can you come up with any reliable source that backs up your claim? Clarityfiend (talk) 06:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply