This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Frankly as a member of the UNB campus and as a person who pays for the Brunswickan whether I like it or not, I think that the paper requires improvements, some of them quite drastically. I do not think that the removal of the cricism section in this page was warranted, and I would like to see it back, perhaps with some modifications. And as soon as I get some new batteries for my mouse, I may do just that. Does anyone else have any opinions on the matter? GBMorris22:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sure. If you think the paper needs to be improved, don't waste your time on the internet. Join the paper and help make it into something you'd be proud of. Like you said, you're paying for it either way. So instead of complaining about it, why not try to make it better?
