[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Typhoon Emma (1959)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by HickoryOughtShirt?4 in topic GA Review
Former featured article candidateTyphoon Emma (1959) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleTyphoon Emma (1959) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2020Good article nomineeListed
May 12, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 24, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a fisherman who was presumed dead during Typhoon Emma in 1959 returned for his funeral meal ten days later?
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Info

edit

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Emma (1959)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 23:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review

edit

Lead

edit
  • "Emma steadily weakened and became extratropical on November 13, the JMA ceased tracking the storm on November 15" seems awkwardly written. Maybe add "and the JMA ceased...." or "As Emma steadily weakened...."
  • Added the "and".
  • Can "tropical depression" be Wikilinked?
  • Done.
  • This could be because I am unfamiliar with Typhoons but this reference and this reference doesn't make sense to me. How can I read it to check for information?
  • Added two more notes.

Done with fixes, @HickoryOughtShirt?4:. Thanks for the review. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Alrighty, congratulations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply