Talk:Turtle Island

Don't want to be unnecessarily skeptical, but ordinarily there would be no real reason for any language to have a name for a continent specifically unless the speakers of that language were aware of the existence of more than one continent... AnonMoos (talk) 20:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not to mention that the chance is very, VERY slim that any Natives would have visited both the West and East coast and considered North America to be an "island". Adding a tag. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 11:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. This article currently states, without justification, that Turtle Island is a concept referring to North America specifically... rather than "the land that humans know", or "the world", etc. Mebden (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to move it to a new title that isn't specifically tied to North America, as I agree that the name does not seem to have been originally intended to refer specifically to North America, but to all land on Earth. Kaldari (talk) 22:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The foundational sources for this page agree that Native Americans of the Northeastern Woodlands used terms variously translated as Turtle Island to refer to the known world which to them was North America. The term referred to the known world of those Native Americans and they knew solely of North America and thus today the term has become associated with North America alone. No reliable sources have been provided that reject this notion and considering that the change to the name "Turtle Island (Indigenous North American folklore)" has also caused controversy regarding the eurocentrism of the term folkore, I'm going to suggest moving the page back to "Turtle Island (North America)". AethyrX (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why do you say they only knew North America? Indigenousin North and South America have many genetical similarities (see Genetic history of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas, and there was much exchange, from today's Mexico to Canada and Ecuador and Bolivia. As well as many of the Caribbean and Pacific Islands. The idea that they only knew North America is very.... North American. 204.101.158.131 (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This was a while back so I'm reconstructing my thought process just as much as you are but I believe I was referring to the term being derived from a belief regarding the creation of the world yet coming to mean simply 'North America'. So I was likely operating under the assumption that a term narrowing from 'the world' to 'North America' would mean that the conception of the world at the time was entirely 'North America'. It's most definitely possible that I was wrong and the indigenous people of the Northeastern Woodlands knew of more than so-called 'North America'. Iirc, people from Rapa Nui had made contact with the Sinú and people from surrounding areas and that's across the ocean so it's very possible there was contact throughout the land. Regardless, my point was that the term is variably used more specifically than just "the known world" and the move to reflect that has already went through. Sidenote: I'm from the Caribbean idk if you consider that 'North American' but idk if that matters much to the point anyway AethyrX (talk) 20:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply