Talk:Raoul Dufy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Dew-fee"?
editAccording to whom? Which accent? We're not all yanks, thanks.--140.137.246.67 (talk) 06:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Image
editThe image Victory Rooster, pencil sketch for a silk scarf (1918) posted by Racconish was removed twice from the article by myself. It is out of focus, excessively cropped and no source is provided. On its description page, it is said to be in the collection of the Musée National d'Art Moderne in Paris. I have found no record of it there, and have asked for a source. Also, according its the Fair use rationale, this is a "significant work", its inclusion in the article "adds significantly to the article": obviously not the case. There is a work at Musée national d'art moderne: La Fin de la Grande Guerre (1915), but this is obviously not the same work. Coldcreation (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Coldcreation, apologies : I had not realized your previous revert. The source of the image is Dora Perez-Tibi's Dufy. The image is reproduced page 113. Caption : "Etude pour le Drapeau de la Victoire, 1918. Mine de plomb. Paris, musée national d'art moderne". Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 07:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Coldcreation (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Coldcreation Ok then ? — Racconish ☎ 13:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Racconish, do you have, or can you find, an image of the work that is in focus and uncropped? Note, if you would like to upload works by Dufy, there are a few in the public domain available at Gallica - Bibliothèque nationale de France. Such as here, here, and here: Others too if published before 1923. The rooster adds little to the article, and it's copyright is protected. Coldcreation (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Coldcreation, all the reproductions of Dufy's works from the Fonds Albert Pomme de Mirimonde are not in the public domain in France, despite the blanket mention by Gallica for the fonds. They repeat File:Raoul Dufy, Le grand concert.jpg (which should be moved to WP as it is fair use) and do not help illustrate Dufy's decorative work. I had put the rooster image because it is an example selected by a specialist of Dufy of an artistic work which is the basis for a later application to decorative arts (see File:Victory rooster.jpg). It is perfectly in line with the fair use policy to upload a lower res cropped image. I still consider we should illustrate Dufy's decorative work and I have supplied the requested source but it does not have to be this image and I agree the Victory Rooster is not the most illustrative decorative work by Dufy.— Racconish ☎ 07:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Racconish, thanks for your explanation. In that light feel free to post the image back in the article. Perhaps it could be mentioned in the caption that it is the 'basis for a later application to decorative arts'. Coldcreation (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Any other idea to better illustrate the subject ? Maybe a woodblock from the Bestaire ? Dufy said somewhere it was his original research work for decorative arts... — Racconish ☎ 13:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Racconish, thanks for your explanation. In that light feel free to post the image back in the article. Perhaps it could be mentioned in the caption that it is the 'basis for a later application to decorative arts'. Coldcreation (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Coldcreation, all the reproductions of Dufy's works from the Fonds Albert Pomme de Mirimonde are not in the public domain in France, despite the blanket mention by Gallica for the fonds. They repeat File:Raoul Dufy, Le grand concert.jpg (which should be moved to WP as it is fair use) and do not help illustrate Dufy's decorative work. I had put the rooster image because it is an example selected by a specialist of Dufy of an artistic work which is the basis for a later application to decorative arts (see File:Victory rooster.jpg). It is perfectly in line with the fair use policy to upload a lower res cropped image. I still consider we should illustrate Dufy's decorative work and I have supplied the requested source but it does not have to be this image and I agree the Victory Rooster is not the most illustrative decorative work by Dufy.— Racconish ☎ 07:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Racconish, do you have, or can you find, an image of the work that is in focus and uncropped? Note, if you would like to upload works by Dufy, there are a few in the public domain available at Gallica - Bibliothèque nationale de France. Such as here, here, and here: Others too if published before 1923. The rooster adds little to the article, and it's copyright is protected. Coldcreation (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Coldcreation Ok then ? — Racconish ☎ 13:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Coldcreation (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Bestiare sounds like a great idea. Also maybe La Fin de la Grande Guerre (1915) linked above. The motif is similar to the "Etude pour le Drapeau de la Victoire, 1918. Coldcreation (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Raoul Dufy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070423174301/http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/Latvia/treasures_en.xml to http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/Latvia/treasures_en.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)