Talk:Port of Iloilo

We had five alternative names listed in the article, all of which was a simple translation of "port of Iloilo" (See below). These do not seem to be useful since "port of iloilo" is nearly universally used, even in non-English conversation. Perhaps the Filipino/Tagalog should be included since it is the other official language. But do we need two Hiligaynon options and a Kinaray-a one? Consider WP:Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Alternative names and WP:Laundry list. Being WP:Bold I deleted all alternatives, which is my slight preference (cleaner, simpler). I think that we should build a WP:Consensus towards what our policy should be, and then consider adopting that policy across all of Philippine-related Wikipedia articles.

Here is what I deleted: Filipino: Pantalan ng Iloilo, Hiligaynon: Puerto sang Iloilo, Dungkaan sang Iloilo or Kinaray-a: Durungkaan kang Iloilo, Spanish: Puerto de Iloilo

--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Port of Iloilo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080120143955/http://www.iloilocity.gov.ph:80/history.php to http://www.iloilocity.gov.ph/history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply