Talk:Lowood, Queensland

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://lowood.qld.au/historic-sites/first-post-office-c1910 http://lowood.qld.au/historic-sites/lowood-raaf-airbase-1941-46 http://lowood.qld.au/historic-sites/1933-glendale-colliery. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Bleakcomb (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Bleakcomb! I see you removed a lot of content out of the Lowood article on the grounds of copyvio. You mention 3 sources, but I am seeing content that you have removed that has not come from any of those 3 sources; why have those bits been removed? Also, I looked on the Internet Archive and none of the 3 sources you mention appear in the archive until after the content was added to Wikipedia; that is, I could not find evidence of those "sources" pre-dating the Wikipedia content. What makes you so sure that this is a copyright violation and not that someone has created these other webpages using content taken from Wikipedia? Thanks Kerry (talk) 08:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kerry. I don't have to be sure, I just have to have strong suspicions: "On 5 May a No. 71 Squadron Anson was patrolling over a convoy when the merchant ship SS Fingal (below right) was torpedoed and sunk. The crew spotted the torpedo tracks but could not locate the submarine. " (below right) makes sense when layed out in the external source but the contributor hasn't bothered to remove the reference to an image that was not copied when it was dropped in WP. And there were other artifacts of the original publication that were included in the first large paste to WP. I believe I have acted in accordance with Dealing with copyright violations. I have reverted to a version prior to the addition of the text until someone can go through and determine what is and what isn't suitable for inclusion. I won't be looking at it tonight, perhaps sometime over the weekend. Thanks for your query. Also, if you wouldn't mind directing further comments about this to the article talk page, please. I'll copy this over there soon, if that is ok. --Bleakcomb (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

[1] --Falcadore (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lowood, Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.somerset.qld.gov.au/lowood.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100516144554/http://www.somersettourism.com.au/ to http://www.somersettourism.com.au/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502154031/http://www.australianlocations.com.au/queensland/lowood.html to http://www.australianlocations.com.au/queensland/lowood.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply