Talk:Lamar, Colorado

Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:

1. Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
2. Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
3. Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.

Please review the following before editing:

1. Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
2. Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
3. Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, ISBN 9780596515164.

• Sbmeirow • Talk • 08:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lamar, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/wesley-tuttle-548912.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lamar, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5uRWqBo2m?url=http://www.dola.state.co.us/dlg/local_governments/municipalities.html to http://www.dola.state.co.us/dlg/local_governments/municipalities.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150522132816/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014-3.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014-3.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5uRWp2Zfd?url=http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown.jsp to http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown.jsp
• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I added the following, which was reverted by [User:Sbmeirow]:

In 2017, Lamar was identified as being the poorest town in Colorado using the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey data.^[1]

With the following reason given:

non-notable website, not important detail, not static information because continually changes, removed for similar reason why we don't single out other stats, like most blacks or least blacks in a city

Even though none of these objections cite WP:MOS, I will address these one by one:

• "non-notable website". Presumably this is a reference to WP:RS. However, no specific condition within WP:RS was cited. Moreover, 247wallst.com is frequently used as a source throughout Wikipedia: [1]

• "not important detail". If we assume that having a section on "Economy" is relevant to a geographic article -- and having such is pervasive throughout Wikipedia -- then noting a statistical extreme is indeed notable.

• "not static information". That is why the year 2017 was cited.

• "removed for similar reason why we don't single out other stats, like most blacks or least blacks in a city". Per-capita income is not a racial statistic. I cannot even begin to address this objection because I don't know why it was made.

Michaelmalak (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

1) 247wallst website isn't notable, it's a click-bait website that doesn't have a wikipedia article for the website. If it's frequently used, then it only means the domain has slid under the radar.

2) 247wallst article doesn't provide any government reference to validate that each city is actually the lowest of each state.

3) Non-decade years means that all census related information is estimated. By non-static, I mean that income is continuously moving up and down.

4) I didn't say it was racist, you did. I said that singling out specific demographics as being either the best or worst, which are typically frowned upon.

5) One more issue, your link doesn't point at the exact colorado sub-webpage, which is unrelated issue.

6) • Sbmeirow • Talk • 23:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lamar, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811061751/http://www.lamar.k12.co.us/ to http://www.lamar.k12.co.us/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply