[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Kakori conspiracy

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Renamed user aaaa in topic Questionable language

Page move

edit

The original article title Kakori train action appears to have been created specifically for Wikipedia. A Google search for "kakori train action" -wikipedia turned up one hit, a Wikipedia mirror, apparently. Because of that and the title's inherant POV, I have moved this page to Kakori train robbery. This new title is in line with the English naming convention for train robberies and shows many Google hits from non-Nationalistic sources. --Adamrush 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Keshab Chakravarthy and K. B. Hedgewar

edit

See Talk:K. B. Hedgewar#Keshab_Chakravarthy_and_K._B._Hedgewar. utcursch | talk 05:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Questionable language

edit

Describing the robbers without qualification as "freedom fighters" for an action in which they killed an innocent bystander is more than a little biased. Rebels, perhaps? Militants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.169.64 (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

The robbers belonged to the organisation named the Hindustan Republican Association which aimed to free India of the British rule and make it an independent country. Thus, if robbers are called "freedom fighters", there is nothing wrong in it. Moreover, all those involved in this action didn't rob the train for their personal agendas, but to buy arms and ammunitions to fulfill their agenda of independence for India. So, the language isn't questionable at all !! And on the point of them killing someone: the passenger was killed unintentionally !!! We owe to call them either "revolutionaries" or "freedom fighters", no other words. Again I would say, the language isn't questionable at all !! Renamed user aaaa (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply