Talk:KTXH

You could always expand it. Pufferfish101 01:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Some_Person's My20 logo is of low quality. Could someone kindly upload a higher quality logo?

I agree. It's been far too long with

I have removed the above image from the history section of the article because it's redundant and doesn't really reflect a logo that was used at any time, at least the way we're defining it. Although this jeopardizes its fair use status, I would strongly recommend it not be deleted as an orphan, because we may need it later if the current version is deemed unsatisfactory in any way. Morgan Wick 03:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

216.190.135.175 recently re-added the logo with an edit summary of: (That logo was in fact used on KTXH for a couple of days.) Okay. However, a) is a logo used for only "a couple of days" notable enough to be in the article, especially when b) it is fundamentally essentially a 2D version of another logo that's in 3D but otherwise the same? I'd like your opinions on this! Morgan Wick 21:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The logos are similiar, but not exactly the same. Yes, they both say "My20". Yes, they both have the blue and grey checkered pattern. But one is a 2D logo which only has 6 colors, while the other one is a 3D logo which has many colors. Both were broadcasted on KTXH, but not at the same time. In the "Logos" section, the 2D logo has the summary '"My20" logo, in use since June 2006'. This is not correct, as the 2D logo has not been broadcasted on KTXH since early June. Since the 2D logo has obviously been discontinued, I suggest that they should be treated as seperate. Some Person 2:24 PM, July 21 2006 (CST)

Okay, so some explanation in the article or captions might be needed. Personally, I still fail to see how an adjustment from 2D to 3D is sufficient to be considered separate logos, when the 2D version was so incredibly short-lived. This sort of "every one-pixel change is a separate logo" thing is a bit too widespread on Wikipedia, in my view. Morgan Wick 16:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I say it is sufficient, as the logos are not the same. The 2D logo was short-lived, but it was still a logo on My20. And, it is no longer broadcasted. I certainly agree that a few pixels worth of change is not considered a new logo. However, more than just a few pixels are different. The 2D logo has many fewer colors and is much less detailed. So I still think that the logos should both be seperate and still on Wikipedia. Some Person 9:26 PM, July 27 2006 (CST)

I was exaggerating for effect. In a few years, no one will even remember a few short days it may have used a 2D logo. Some people might not have seen it at all. It's not like that many people are watching UPN as it begins to dissolve, and it's not like anyone watches at all the crap these stations put on in non-network time. It's a footnote, most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference. I would, and you of course would, but... it's not just the lack of change, it's how short-lived one version was. Morgan Wick 07:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KTXH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KTXH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607113823/http://moviestvnetwork.com/where-to-watch.php to http://www.moviestvnetwork.com/where-to-watch.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply